comparator

Not implementing all the methods of an interface

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-12-03 11:43:35
I tried reproducing the code below on eclipse. I get an error telling me that I have to implement all the inherited methods (because Comparator is an interface). The type new Comparator(){} must implement the inherited abstract method Comparator.reversed() . There are many of these methods and the only one I want to overwrite is compare. Do I have to implement all the other methods or is there a way to specify I don't need to implement them? I understand that I will have to do it because of the contractual nature of an interface, but what if I just need to change one method? static Map

Why does Comparator declare equals?

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-12-03 10:45:15
问题 The Comparator interface has its own equals() method. Any class will get equals() by default through Object class. What is the need to have equals() method inside an interface? 回答1: Comparator refines the contract of Object.equals : It has to satisfy the constraints set out by Object.equals and then some . Additionally, this method can return true only if the specified object is also a comparator and it imposes the same ordering as this comparator. Thus, comp1.equals(comp2) implies that sgn

Making a generic comparator class [closed]

故事扮演 提交于 2019-12-03 10:41:08
I'm trying to make a comparator that can take any type of an element to compare. I'm unsure about how to create the class. I just want it to compare two elements of the same type (But whatever type the client gives it, ex: Integer, String, Double, etc...) to see which one is greater then the other. public class InsertionComparator implements Comparator<T> { /** * Compares two elements. * * @param f1 The first element you want to compare. * @param f2 The second element you want to compare. * @return -1,0,1 Whether or not one is greater than, less than, * or equal to one another. */ public int

Comparator best practice

久未见 提交于 2019-12-03 08:07:42
If I implement a custom comparator is it considered good practice to overide equals besides compare ? Additionally is there a defined contract for a Comparator ? assylias The contract of Comparator is defined in its javadoc . In particular: Caution should be exercised when using a comparator capable of imposing an ordering inconsistent with equals to order a sorted set (or sorted map). Suppose a sorted set (or sorted map) with an explicit comparator c is used with elements (or keys) drawn from a set S. If the ordering imposed by c on S is inconsistent with equals, the sorted set (or sorted map

Priority queue with Pointers and Comparator C++

别等时光非礼了梦想. 提交于 2019-12-03 07:38:20
I just started to learn C++, Half of the time I don't know what am I doing, spend hours and hours searching on Google and blindly put codes inside my project, this might be a basic question, but I just can't seems to get it right. This is the requirement of my assignment, I need to have these: in the Edge class: public: bool operator()(Edge*, Edge*) in the Graph class: private: priority_queue<Edge*, vector<Edge*>, Edge> edges I have problem declaring the priority_queue. Details: If I directly use these, the edge class will give me an error of "must have an argument of class", I understand that

Why is equals not mandatory to implement in java.util.Comparator?

僤鯓⒐⒋嵵緔 提交于 2019-12-03 07:14:08
问题 Either in Javadoc as well as the code itself, Comparator interface defines: int compare(T o1, T o2); boolean equals(Object obj); But then this gives no probs compilating: Comparator a = new Comparator() { @Override public int compare(Object o1, Object o2) { //.. } }; But this does: Comparator a = new Comparator() { @Override public boolean equals(Object comparator) { //.. } }; How its done for the interface for allowing us not to override method? 回答1: First of all JavaDocs explain clearly

Why should a Comparator implement Serializable?

北慕城南 提交于 2019-12-03 06:30:20
问题 New to Java. Learning it while working on an Android app. I am implementing a Comparator to sort a list of files and the android docs say that a Comparator should implement Serializable: It is recommended that a Comparator implements Serializable. This is the Serializable interface here. I just want to sort a list of files. Why should I implement this or what even is the reason why it should be for any Comparator? 回答1: This is not just an Android thing, the Java SDK has the same

C++ string sort like a human being?

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2019-12-03 06:25:05
I would like to sort alphanumeric strings the way a human being would sort them. I.e., "A2" comes before "A10", and "a" certainly comes before "Z"! Is there any way to do with without writing a mini-parser? Ideally it would also put "A1B1" before "A1B10". I see the question "Natural (human alpha-numeric) sort in Microsoft SQL 2005" with a possible answer, but it uses various library functions, as does "Sorting Strings for Humans with IComparer" . Below is a test case that currently fails: #include <set> #include <iterator> #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <cassert> template

Guava: How to create an explicit Ordering from a List and a single element?

孤人 提交于 2019-12-03 05:54:21
In Guava, given a Collection<E> and an element e of type E that I know is in the collection, I'd like to create a custom Ordering<E> that sorts e first and then the rest of the collection. However, the way to get there seems awfully complicated: Collection<String> values = ImmutableList.of("apples", "oranges", "pears"); String first = "oranges"; List<String> remainingValues = newArrayList(values); // this remainingValues.remove(first); // seems Ordering<String> myOrdering = // very Ordering.explicit(first, remainingValues.toArray( // complicated! new String[remainingValues.size()])); // is

What's the sort order of Java's Collections.sort(list, comparator)? small to big or big to small?

风流意气都作罢 提交于 2019-12-03 05:28:13
问题 Apparently, it's not documented or I missed it. Here's the link to the documentation and below's the text as an image: EDIT (17/5): I think too many confused this question to be a comparator question. It is not. The comparator compares between 2 elements. According to that comparison, the list sorted. How? Ascending or Descending? I'll refine/simplify the question even further: If the comparator decides that element A is smaller than element B. In the sorted list , will element A be located