coding-style

问题 Given a class, what reasoning is there for either of the two following code styles? Style A: class Foo { private: doWork(); int bar; } Style B: class Foo { private: int bar; doWork(); } For me, they are a tie. I like Style A because the member variables feel more fine-grained, and thus would appear past the more general member functions. However, I also like Style B, because the member variables seem to determine, in a OOP-style way, what the class is representing. Are there other things

问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 5 years ago . If I have a series of method invocations, the value of each used for the next call, should I store them in local variables, like so: DynamicForm filledForm = Form.form().bindFromRequest(); String shareIdStr = filledForm.get("data[shareId]"); UUID shareId = UUID.fromString

问题 When programming against a fluent API or just using method-chaining, I've seen the style mostly like this: var obj = objectFactory.CreateObject() .SetObjectParameter(paramName, value) .SetObjectParameter(paramName, value) .DoSomeTransformation(); What is the reasoning behind putting the dot at the beginning of the line instead of the end of the line like this: var obj = objectFactory.CreateObject(). SetObjectParameter(paramName, value). SetObjectParameter(paramName, value).

问题 I need to alter the output of a view that displays in a in a block in order to apply it to some format of a Jquery UI script so I need the following format for a grouped taxonomy query that I'va configured for some node type.. <div id="tab"> <ul> <li><a href="#tabs-1">Tab1Title</a></li> <li><a href="#tabs-2">Tab2Title</a></li> <li><a href="#tabs-3">Tab3Title</a></li> </ul> </div> <div id="tabs-1">Content2</div> <div id="tabs-2">Content2</div> <div id="tabs-3">Content3</div> 回答1: You need to

问题 I defined resource in XAML for SystemColors. It is working great if I set Foregroung property directly to the TextBlock. However, I am getting an error shown below if I assign foreground property in style. I am not sure what is the issue and how to solve it. Any ideas are highly appreciated! Code when I set foreground directly in the texblock. It is working perfectly <TextBlock Text="WindowTextColor" Foreground="{Binding WindowTextColor, Source={StaticResource SystemColors}, Converter=

问题 How can I simulate multiple inheritance in C# without using interfaces. I do believe, interfaces abilityes are not intended for this task. I'm looking for more 'design pattern' oriented way. 回答1: ECMA-334, § 8.9 Interfaces ... Interfaces can employ multiple inheritance. So for as far C# (limited) support of 'multiple inheritance' goes, interfaces are the official way. 回答2: Like Marcus said using interface + extension methods to make something like mixins is probably your best bet currently.

问题 We are using CheckStyle to enforce our style standards. One of the style rules we opted to include was the NeedBraces module. NeedBraces specifies that every block type statement (such as if , else , for ) must have opening and closing curly braces. However, as far as I can tell it isn't working entirely correctly. This example will trigger a CheckStyle error. if (true) { System.out.println("20"); } else System.out.println("30"); Because the else case doesn't have braces. However, the next

问题 I have a class with a string property that's actually several strings joined with a separator. I'm wondering if it is good form to have a proxy property like this: public string ActualProperty { get { return actualProperty; } set { actualProperty = value; } } public string[] IndividualStrings { get { return ActualProperty.Split(.....); } set { // join strings from array in propval .... ; ActualProperty = propval; } } Is there any risks I have overlooked? 回答1: Linking two settable properties

问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 6 years ago . There are a couple of differing styles when initializing automatically managed simple variables other than via assignment. I was

问题 Anyone have a naming strategy that works well for service proxy classes? For example, if I am given three web services within two projects as follows: XWs AService.asmx YWs BService.svc CService.svc What would use as the Service Reference Name & Namespace for AService , BService and CService ? In general, I'd like something in the proxy name/namespace to indicate that the thing being used is not a concrete class, but represents a proxy - both so it doesnt clash with usage of concrete classes