code-generation

I am looking for a simple compiler that compiles a simple language, I need it to write a paper about it and to learn how compilers work, I am not looking for a sophisticated thing just a simple language (by simple I mean a small code because for example gcc is toooooo big). any help is appreciated. If you want to look at code, I'm very impressed with Eijiro Sumii's MinCaml compiler. It's only 2000 lines long. It compiles a pretty interesting source language. It generates real machine code, none of this namby-pamby C or LLVM stuff :-) Speed of compiled code is competetive with gcc and the

I have a specific Postgre schema that gathers all tables that defines types, like Status(name, description) where values could be OPEN, Open item status , CLOSED, Closed item status , etc. We need to fetch all these tables and generate enums based on them to later use it within our app. So, these enums should look like: enum Status { OPEN("Open item status"), CLOSED("Closed item status") ... } We decided to use JOOQ which looks pretty interesting, but we cannot find documentation/examples to create a custom generator that use default java generator behavior plus a custom enum generation

I use Jibx CodeGen maven Plugin to generate java sources and binding from xsd files. I want to maintain several versions of the xsd in the same applications so I plan to generate to a different target package depending the version of the XSD. JBix seems to generate java package based on the namespaces of the xsd files. ie. for namespace http://www.example.jibx.org/generated/v30/types it generates package org.jibx.example.generated.v30.types During maven build code generation seems to work and binding files are generated but during the binding phase, it says that Verification was a failure :

Originally motivated by the following question: Mapped calls to clojurescript macro Suppose you want to create many similar functions automatically (i.e. without hand-writing them all). Suppose we have some pre-existing functions and we want wrap them with handlers for a callback of some sort: (defn do-foo [] (println "I foo'ed")) (defn do-bar [] (println "I bar'ed")) (defn do-baz [] (println "I baz'ed")) (defn manual-on-foo [] (do-foo)) (defn manual-on-bar [] (do-bar)) (defn manual-on-baz [] (do-baz)) (println "Calling manual-on-* functions") (manual-on-foo) (manual-on-bar) (manual-on-baz)

I'm working on a project that uses a lot of generated files for a GUI. After some recent updates, I get this error. If I remove some controls (the new ones or some old ones, doesn't seem to matter which), the error goes away. I've temporarily worked around the problem, but I'd like a more permanent solution. I've seen mentioned on the web that there's a fix for this in VS.Net 2003, but I can't find anything for 6.0. Does anyone know of a hotfix or service pack that fixes this? Mike Dunlavey This is an example of why I became a maverick and developed another way of programming UIs . It has none

I have a aspx page that has a UpdatePanel and a asp timer. the timer tick is the trigger for the update panel. If add anything to the update panel (even a space!) Visual Studio automagically adds the following <Triggers> <System.Web.UI.AsyncPostBackTrigger ControlID="tm1" EventName="Tick"></System.Web.UI.AsyncPostBackTrigger> </Triggers> Even though the page has already registered the following (albeit in the same triggers section) <Triggers> <asp:AsyncPostBackTrigger ControlID="tm1" EventName="Tick" /> </Triggers> So my questions are these 1) What is the difference between asp

We have a bunch of files that are auto-generated based on the database model. I have had some facepalm experiences because I modified some code, only to find out my modifications where overwritten because I'd not noticed that my changes were in those generated files. So, I modified our generator to include a "do not modify" comment in the file header. This helps! Although, when tracing method calls, it's easy to end up in the middle of one of these files, and you wouldn't necessarily know unless you scrolled to the top to check for the header. That is awkward (and error-prone). Is there any