clr

This question already has answers here : Is there a way to log or intercept First Chance Exceptions (3 answers) Closed 2 years ago . Is there a way to catch First-Chance exceptions, and log them without running under a debugger? I suppose another way to ask the question is can I write something that will act like a debugger being attached to my process and see what is going wrong while it happens? If you are on .NET 4.0, you can use the AppDomain.FirstChanceException event to get notification of exceptions. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3888670/catching-first-chance-exceptions-in

What is the exactly definition of Runtime Host? From MSDN : The common language runtime has been designed to support a variety of different types of applications, from Web server applications to applications with a traditional rich Windows user interface. Each type of application requires a runtime host to start it. The runtime host loads the runtime into a process, creates the application domains within the process, and loads user code into the application domains. So is it a process which loads the runtime into another process? How do I check it in Task Manager? No, it's a process that loads

I'm trying the new library from microsoft, ClrMD , to analyze crash-dumps and live process. I've follow the sample in the .NET framework blog post (using the attached .cs file ). I tried to run the sample to analyze .dmp file which was taken from a program running on the same machine as the sample. when trying to create the run-time object, using the following code: ClrRuntime runtime = target.CreateRuntime(dacLocation); This exception is thrown: Message: Failure loading DAC: CreateDacInstance failed 0x80131c30 at Microsoft.Diagnostics.Runtime.Desktop.DacLibrary.Init(String dll) at Microsoft

I work on applications developed in C#/.NET with Visual Studio. Very often ReSharper, in the prototypes of my methods, advises me to replace the type of my input parameters with more generic ones. For instance, List<> with IEnumerable<> if I only use the list with a foreach in the body of my method. I can understand why it looks smarter to write that but I'm quite concerned with the performance. I fear that the performance of my apps will decrease if I listen to ReSharper... Can someone explain to me precisely (more or less) what's happening behind the scenes (i.e. in the CLR) when I write:

For an application I am writing, I want to have extreme extensibility and extension methods seem to give me what I want, plus the ability to call them without an instance, which I need too. I remember reading that static methods are faster than instance methods but don't get the advantages of GC. Is this correct? It's highly unlikely I will change my design unless I find a superior alternative by design not speed. But still for extra information I wanna know the differences in speed, GC, etc. EDIT: Thanks. More info: Let's say we have a Person class: class Person which can have an instance

I'm trying to wrap some legacy C code for use with C# running on .NET Core. I'm using the approach given here to create a C++ wrapper that compiles to pure MSIL. It's working well for simple functions, but I've found that if my code ever uses pointers-to-pointers or arrays of pointers it will crash with a memory violation. Often it crashes Visual Studio and I have to restart everything, which is tedious. For example, the following code will cause the crashes: public ref class example { public: static void test() { Console::WriteLine("\nTesting pointers."); double a[5] = {5,6,7,8,9}; //Array.