client

问题 I am developing a client program to hit a post url and get the response from it Below is my code var http = require('http'); var fs = require('fs'); var postData = "<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'utf-8'?><REST><Contact>aa</Contact></REST>"; fs.readFile('SampleData.xml', 'utf8', function (err, fileData) { if (err) { return console.log(err); } else { console.log("\n Data : \n\n" +fileData); var options = { host: 'kkk', port: 1, path: '/root', method: 'POST', headers: { "Content-Type" :

问题 I am currently using the client-API to implement a simple user front-end to upload products. The function client->products->create() seems to work fine, how ever I can’t get around one issue. Every time I upload a product, the vendor is set to the admin user instead of the user that is currently logged in. Is there a way to set the vendor through the API? Has anybody get done this? This is the function I created that is called by AJaX when the form is submitted (I left key and website fields

问题 I have client that works on 2 threads. One is sending data and second one is receiving data. In sending data I have std::getline(std::cin,string) . Now in this thread I have infinite loop which ends if second threads end or if user put EXIT command, everything work great expect that when second thread is ended and infinite loop is ended, program still waits for pressing button because of std::getline . Now to question: How can I send data to getline to "fake" pressing button so I don't have

问题 I have client that works on 2 threads. One is sending data and second one is receiving data. In sending data I have std::getline(std::cin,string) . Now in this thread I have infinite loop which ends if second threads end or if user put EXIT command, everything work great expect that when second thread is ended and infinite loop is ended, program still waits for pressing button because of std::getline . Now to question: How can I send data to getline to "fake" pressing button so I don't have

问题 import socket # Set up a TCP/IP socket s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,socket.SOCK_STREAM) # Connect as client to a selected server # on a specified port s.connect(("www.wellho.net",80)) # Protocol exchange - sends and receives s.send("GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0\n\n") while True: resp = s.recv(1024) if resp == "": break print(resp,) # Close the connection when completed s.close() print("\ndone") Error: cg0546wq@smaug:~/Desktop/440$ python3 HTTPclient.py Traceback (most recent call last): File

问题 I'm trying to choose an design pattern for an application that I'm developing. The application is primarily based on a Client-Server architecture where the Client basically reads and writes data to the Server; its not a Web-application however, The client will have to install the software executable and then interact with a GUI in order to communicate with the Server (which exits on a different machine) through an internet protocol. Since the application is based on heavy interaction with a

问题 I've been using the following code to detect browser client area width for ages and it wokred 100% with all browsers, including FF, Safari and various versions of IE. However, now when I switched to a new monitor with widescreen resolution (1280x800) this code fails on IE8. It reports clientwidth of 1024 !!!??? Any ideas how to get the correct client area width ? function getClientWidth() { var v=0,d=document,w=window; if((!d.compatMode || d.compatMode == 'CSS1Compat') && !w.opera && d

问题 Using CQL3, the Cassandra consistency level is now set at the session level. The Datastax documentation for the native Java client states: Session instances are thread-safe and usually a single instance is all you need per application But I struggle to see how a single Session instance can handle multiple consistency levels (for example writes with QUORUM and reads with ONE). I see potential race conditions all over the place. An obvious solution would be to create separate sessions for reads

问题 Using CQL3, the Cassandra consistency level is now set at the session level. The Datastax documentation for the native Java client states: Session instances are thread-safe and usually a single instance is all you need per application But I struggle to see how a single Session instance can handle multiple consistency levels (for example writes with QUORUM and reads with ONE). I see potential race conditions all over the place. An obvious solution would be to create separate sessions for reads

问题 From Apache, you can use the "mod_jk" module to send HTTP requests to Tomcat using the "AJP" protocol, which is far more efficient that HTTP itself. I want to do the same, but from a Java program. I want to use "AJP" because of its good performances (and Tomcat is not bad after all). Does someone know about a Java implementation of the client side of "AJP" ? 回答1: Doesn't the tomcat-ajp.jar present in %TOMCAT_HOME%/server/lib have the AJP implementation? 回答2: There's open source Apache ajp