clause

How to Optimize the Use of the “OR” Clause When Used with Parameters (SQL Server 2008)

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2020-01-20 04:53:10
问题 I wonder if there is any wise way to rewrite the following query so that the indexes on columns get used by optimizer? CREATE PROCEDURE select_Proc1 @Key1 int=0, @Key2 int=0 AS BEGIN SELECT key3 FROM Or_Table WHERE (@key1 = 0 OR Key1 = @Key1) AND (@key2 = 0 OR Key2 = @Key2) END GO According to this article How to Optimize the Use of the "OR" Clause When Used with Parameters by Preethiviraj Kulasingham: Even though columns in the WHERE clauses are covered by indexes, SQL Server is unable to

How to Optimize the Use of the “OR” Clause When Used with Parameters (SQL Server 2008)

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2020-01-20 04:53:06
问题 I wonder if there is any wise way to rewrite the following query so that the indexes on columns get used by optimizer? CREATE PROCEDURE select_Proc1 @Key1 int=0, @Key2 int=0 AS BEGIN SELECT key3 FROM Or_Table WHERE (@key1 = 0 OR Key1 = @Key1) AND (@key2 = 0 OR Key2 = @Key2) END GO According to this article How to Optimize the Use of the "OR" Clause When Used with Parameters by Preethiviraj Kulasingham: Even though columns in the WHERE clauses are covered by indexes, SQL Server is unable to

mysql limit 翻页数据重复的问题

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2020-01-06 13:54:41
【推荐】2019 Java 开发者跳槽指南.pdf(吐血整理) >>> 0.背景 Mysql版本:5.7 1.出问题原因   在MySql5.6开始,limit加入了一个新特性: LIMIT Query Optimization 。假设你写了这样一个sql: select * from my_table limit 10,10;   它是符合优化原则的: MySQL sometimes optimizes a query that has a LIMIT row_count clause and no HAVING clause:   纵览所有的优化原则,发现与我们最普通的情况有关系的也只有这一条: If an index is not used for ORDER BY but a LIMIT clause is also present, the optimizer may be able to avoid using a merge file and sort the rows in memory using an in-memory filesort operation.   意即: 如果索引未用于ORDER BY,但也存在LIMIT子句,则优化器可能能够避免使用合并文件,并使用内存中文件排序操作对内存中的行进行排序。 再有和我们有点关系的可能也就是: If you

社区观点 | 理解比原链MOV链上交换协议

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-27 18:03:05
【推荐】2019 Java 开发者跳槽指南.pdf(吐血整理) >>> 去中心化交换协议的发展 从Bitshare,Stellar到以太坊上的Etherdelta,Bancor,0x协议,去中心化交换协议也经过了好几代发展和很多模式的探索,每一代都通过前面的协议的痛点来进行改进和深化, 主要分为: 链上orderbook,链上结算; 链下orderbook,链上结算; 基于智能合约管理的资金池; 链上orderbook,链上结算 最早的 基于以太坊的去中心化交换协议的成功探索非Etherdelta莫属,曾一度占据去中心化交换市场的半壁江山。Etherdelta是较为完全的去中心化模式,用户充值、挂单、吃单、结算及提现全部在链上完成。 具体运行机制如下: Etherdelta的整个运行都在链上完成,用户保管自己的私钥,平台不会触碰用户资产,保证了资产和交换的安全、透明。但其弊病也较为明显: 由于所有的交换环节都在链上完成,且每一个挂单、撤单、吃单等操作都会消耗GAS费用,导致延时高、成本效益低下。 存在矿工非法预先交换的可能。 链下orderbook,链上结算 为了解决纯链上效率低下,且手续费低廉的问题,0x协议引入了relayer(中继)的概念,所有订单都发给relayer,无需上链,只有成交才会上链。 0x的“链下订单中继、链上最终结算”运作模式如下: 0x协议的主要问题在于

Oracle 全文索引学习

孤者浪人 提交于 2019-12-25 11:50:14
【推荐】2019 Java 开发者跳槽指南.pdf(吐血整理) >>> 关于字符串搜索 有很多时候,使用instr和like实现字符串搜索是很方便快捷,特别是搜索仅跨越很小的表的时候如下所示: SELECT *FROM mytext WHERE INSTR (thetext, 'Oracle') > 0; SELECT * FROM mytext WHERE thetext LIKE '%Oracle%'; 然而对于大表,通过这些文本定位的方法将导致全表扫描,对资源来说消耗比较昂贵,而且实现的搜索功能也非常有限。 Oracle Text,即oracle 全文索引,则可以解决上述方法在效率上及及功能上的局限性。(对于性能的对比可以参阅 http://viralpatel.net/blogs/oracle-index-usage-like-operator-domain-indexes/ ) oracle全文检索 全文检索(full-text search),是 一种将文件中所有文本与检索项匹配的文字资料检索方法。在 oracle 中,用户可以使用 oracle 服务器的上下文( context )选项完成基于文本的查询,相应的方法有通配符查找、模糊匹配、相关分类、近似查找、条件加权和词意扩充等。在 Oracle8.0.x 中 称为 ConText ,在 Oracle8i 中 称为

Scheme宏指南

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-12-23 06:58:12
【推荐】2019 Java 开发者跳槽指南.pdf(吐血整理) >>> 摘要:Scheme是LisP系语言中十分重要的一个方言(Dialect),在元编程、符号计算、系统校验等领域有着举足轻重的作用。而作为LisP系语言中最强大的部分,宏在中文社区中缺少相关的介绍与入门指南。本文参考r6rs标准、Chez Scheme的实现和The Scheme Programming Language,给出一份简洁扼要的说明。本文指出,宏本质上是在描述宏转换器并支持展开器对代码进行脱糖。相信读者读完本文即可茅塞顿开,并且充分意识到一些知名人士早年相关论述的错误与辉煌。 关键词:Scheme,宏,展开器,宏转换器,估值期,脱糖 一、LisP系语言的运行 包括Scheme在内的LisP系语言的编译器以略微不同的体系重构了编程语言的运行过程。不同于略懂一些编译原理的读者所意识到的语法树(Syntax Tree)、中间表示(Intermediate Representation)、编译期和运行期,LisP系语言采用估值期(Evaluation)、编译期和运行期这样的划分方式。 首先,由于LisP系语言采用S-expression,或者说树的括号表示,从C、Java那样的代码转换到语法树的过程被省略了。然后,语法树上所有的标识符(Identifier)被估值(Evaluate)。一个或者数个

Condition left join in CriteriaQuery

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-12-22 05:37:11
问题 Hi everybody I am trying to do this in CriteriaQuery, I was searching so long but I can't found anything to do it, someone can help me? SELECT b.name FROM Empl a LEFT OUTER JOIN Deplo b ON (a.id_depl = b.id_depl) AND b.id_place = 2; I'm just trying to do a condition in left join clause, I saw ".on" function but I don't know if it will work and how it work because I tried to do something like this: Join Table1, Table2j1 = root.join(Table1_.table2, JoinType.LEFT).on(cb.and(cb.equal(table2_

CASE in WHERE CLAUSE in MYSQL

点点圈 提交于 2019-12-20 03:32:50
问题 The question is as simple as the title says,But here is one logic. Here is my code CREATE TABLE `inf_brand_images` ( `id` bigint(99) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `brand` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `thumb` text NOT NULL, `is_active` int(2) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', `cmp_brand` varchar(1024) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=6458 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 Here is data in this table ID | brand | thumb |is_active| cmp_brand 1 | NIKE | a.png | 1 | 2 | DUNHILL| b.png | 1 | 3 | NIKE | c

Possible to have PHP MYSQL query ignore empty variable in WHERE clause?

南笙酒味 提交于 2019-12-19 03:45:19
问题 Not sure how I can do this. Basically I have variables that are populated with a combobox and then passed on to form the filters for a MQSQL query via the where clause. What I need to do is allow the combo box to be left empty by the user and then have that variable ignored in the where clause. Is this possible? i.e., from this code. Assume that the combobox that populates $value1 is left empty, is there any way to have this ignored and only the 2nd filter applied. $query = "SELECT * FROM

The SQL OVER() clause - when and why is it useful?

▼魔方 西西 提交于 2019-12-17 06:22:13
问题 USE AdventureWorks2008R2; GO SELECT SalesOrderID, ProductID, OrderQty ,SUM(OrderQty) OVER(PARTITION BY SalesOrderID) AS 'Total' ,AVG(OrderQty) OVER(PARTITION BY SalesOrderID) AS 'Avg' ,COUNT(OrderQty) OVER(PARTITION BY SalesOrderID) AS 'Count' ,MIN(OrderQty) OVER(PARTITION BY SalesOrderID) AS 'Min' ,MAX(OrderQty) OVER(PARTITION BY SalesOrderID) AS 'Max' FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE SalesOrderID IN(43659,43664); I read about that clause and I don't understand why I need it. What does the