cherry-pick

In TFS, how can I cherry-pick a changeset to an unrelated branch?

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-12-21 15:47:41
问题 I have a very messy TFS structure that I am trying to clean up (thanks to my predecessor). I now have a situation where I need to bring changesets selectively from one branch to another where they don't have a parent/child relationship and I don't want those changes to pass through their shared trunk. How can I do this? I have tried a baseless merge - In TFS, how do I do a baseless merge on specific changesets? - which told me that there were no changes to merge. What I want to achieve is

TortoiseSVN cherrypicking

烈酒焚心 提交于 2019-12-20 16:54:17
问题 I'm about to merge certain revisions from trunk into a release-branch. I've checked with mergeinfo how many revisions are eligible to get merged, and that were 42. Although it's definitely possible and not too hard to check each revision log and decide whether it should be merged or not. I would then check the logs with TortoiseSVN and use the command line svn merge -c rev1,rev2 function or -r for ranges of course. I was wondering if TortoiseSVN has a tool to make this cherrypicking a lot

Workflow to “backport” change into different Mercurial (Hg) branch?

故事扮演 提交于 2019-12-19 13:56:22
问题 We have two heads. One is our main development head and the other is one that I forgot about until today. We found a bug and fixed it in our main development branch, and I just realized it should be fixed in the older branch as well. I think it would have been better to make the change on the older branch and merge that with the up-to-date branch, but we didn't do it that way. Can mercurial handle this? We haven't tried to do anything like this and I can't really wrap my head around how it

Why doesn't git cherry-pick override modification in current branch if their is different?

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-12-19 04:12:51
问题 Look, I make a modification in a branch and then pick a commit from a similar branch, which does not have this modification. I wonder if modification must be rolled back or not. Initially, both A and B branches have a full copy of the same file begin 123 456 def f 789 klm end But they diverge. First, A moves def f into the end of file, producing refactored A begin 123 456 789 klm end def f Now, if we cherry-pick B on top of this A, the original file is recovered ( def f is back in the middle

How to Conclude a Git Cherry-Pick?

我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-12-18 13:53:02
问题 Yesterday I cherry-picked two commits into my main branch, one of them caused merge conflicts and I resolved them, committed and pushed them to origin. Today I am attempting to pull from the server when I get the following error: $ git pull fatal: You have not concluded your cherry-pick (CHERRY_PICK_HEAD exists). Please, commit your changes before you can merge. $ Git status reads: $ git status # On branch main # Your branch is behind 'origin/main' by 2 commits, and can be fast-forwarded. # $

Consequences of using graft in Mercurial

喜欢而已 提交于 2019-12-18 09:54:53
问题 There've been several questions recently about skipping changes when maintaining release branches in Mercurial. For example: Mercurial: Branch specific changes keep coming back after dummy merge Why are Mercurial backouts in one branch affecting other branches? Since it was introduced in 2.0, I've wondered about using graft to avoid this problem. Given a revision tree like this: A---B---C---D---E---F---G---H---I---J Suppose we need to create a release branch that skips the Evil change E . hg

How-to git backport (rebase/cherry-pick) an already merged branch

吃可爱长大的小学妹 提交于 2019-12-18 03:45:53
问题 In our Git process, "master" is the integration branch for topic and fix branches for the current release cycle, but we also maintain a "stable" branch where we have to backport carefully some of our fixes already successfully tested on master. All the difficulty is that the branch has already been merged back in "master" (else it is really easy with rebase --onto) We don't want to change the process the other way because a) we don't want to fix everything in the "stable" branch, and b) we

How-to git backport (rebase/cherry-pick) an already merged branch

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-12-18 03:45:09
问题 In our Git process, "master" is the integration branch for topic and fix branches for the current release cycle, but we also maintain a "stable" branch where we have to backport carefully some of our fixes already successfully tested on master. All the difficulty is that the branch has already been merged back in "master" (else it is really easy with rebase --onto) We don't want to change the process the other way because a) we don't want to fix everything in the "stable" branch, and b) we

Can't cherry pick (error)

左心房为你撑大大i 提交于 2019-12-13 10:39:00
问题 I'm trying to cherry-pick a commit from CyanogenMod Github and having issue, here's more info: Commit to cherry-pick: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_lge_bullhead/commit/4c98c8df392dfb305d7ffe5deaf9a2bdf7824037 Error occurring: error: commit 4c98c8df392dfb305d7ffe5deaf9a2bdf7824037 is a merge but no -m option was given. fatal: cherry-pick failed Please help me, my repo is based off CM, has a different branch and is modified for a different ROM. 回答1: When cherry-picking a merge

How to achieve a private branch in git that “floats” when merging with upstream?

左心房为你撑大大i 提交于 2019-12-12 20:26:31
问题 I have a fork of another organization's repository. I'm at the the latest tag in the repo, which is not the head, and I've created a branch from that tag which will never be pushed upstream. That's why I consider the branch private. I've made commits to my private branch and am using that code in my production environment. When a new tag is made to the upstream repository, I want to be able to pull their changes. However, I'd like to always keep my commits in a neat stack on top of their last