checksum

Cannot resolve Subversion 1.7 checksum mismatch error on update

為{幸葍}努か 提交于 2019-12-05 19:11:27
My Subversion 1.7.17 working copy is unhappy with a particular file but is unable to update it. Any attempt to update gives me the same error, even if I delete the file or delete the directory: Updating 'trunk/src/Makefile': svn: E155017: Checksum mismatch for '/Volumes/project/dev/torc/trunk/src/Makefile': expected: 78ee11ff73f3b68c903db838b6667ec3 recorded: 62bbbf4362958e3fd42470650d5b4eb6 I have read through SVN - Checksum mismatch while updating , and its two main solutions are to modify .svn/entries or to delete and restore the directory. There is nothing useful in the top-level .svn

Checksum for a SQLite database?

▼魔方 西西 提交于 2019-12-05 18:27:43
I'd like to be able to tell whether a SQLite database file has been updated in any way. How would I go about implementing that? The first solution I think of is comparing checksums, but I don't really have any experience working with checksums. According to http://www.sqlite.org/fileformat.html SQLite3 maintains a file change counter in byte 24..27 of the database file. It is independent of the file change time which, for example, can change after a binary restore or rollback while nothing changed at all: $ sqlite3 test.sqlite 'create table test ( test )' $ od --skip-bytes 24 --read-bytes=4

Generate Running Hash (or Checksum) in C#?

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-12-05 16:17:38
Preface: I am doing a data-import that has a verify-commit phase. The idea is that: the first phase allows taking data from various sources and then running various insert/update/validate operations on a database. The commit is rolled back but a "verification hash/checksum" is generated. The commit phase is the same, but, if the "verification hash/checksum" is the same then the operations will be committed. (The database will be running under the appropriate isolation levels.) Restrictions: Input reading and operations are forward-read-once only Do not want to pre-create a stream (e.g. writing

Checking the error detection capabilities of CRC polynomials

孤者浪人 提交于 2019-12-05 14:32:46
I tried to find out how to calculate the error detection capabilities of arbitrary CRC polynomials. I know that there are various error detection capabilities that may (or may not) apply to an arbitrary polynomial: Detection of a single bit error: All CRCs can do this since this only requires a CRC width >= 1. Detection of burst errors: All CRCs can detect burst errors up to a size that equals their width. Detection of odd numbers of bit errors: CRC with polynomials with an even number of terms (which means an even number of 1-bits in the full binary polynomial) can do this. Detection of

How do you create a checksum in Maven then output it to a text file?

牧云@^-^@ 提交于 2019-12-05 14:07:55
Still learning how to use Maven , and I was wondering if there is a way to do a checksum on the generated WAR file. The Maven goal is package , and what I'm trying to achieve is to get a checksum value (of the packaged WAR file) put into a text file alongside the packaged file. Thanks in advance! Got it working with the below pom code and changing my Maven goal to verify <dependency> ... <!-- CheckSum --> <dependency> <groupId>net.ju-n.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>checksum-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>1.2</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>org.bouncycastle</groupId>

32-bit checksum algorithm better quality than CRC32?

送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-12-05 12:04:48
Are there any 32-bit checksum algorithm with either: Smaller hash collision probability for input data sizes < 1 KB ? Collision hits with more uniform distribution. These relative to CRC32. I'm practically not counting on first property, because of limitation of storage space of 32 bits. But for the second ... seems there could be improvements. Any ideas ? Thanks. (I need concrete implementation, better in C, but C++/ C# or anything to start with is also OK). How about MurmurHash ? It is said , that this hash has good distribution (passes chi-square tests) and good avalanche effect. Also very

How can I prove to an outside party that a data file hasn't been tampered with?

梦想与她 提交于 2019-12-05 09:07:59
问题 We have a C#-based web service that receives documents from political organizations which are legally binding documents. Currently, we provide a receipt to the filer which contains a checksum of the file received, so we can prove to the filer at a later point in time that the file stored in our system matches their original submission. The receipt is sent as an e-mail to the filer. However, we can't prove to a third-party auditor that the file and checksum stored in our system have never

How to generate a random unique string with more than 2^30 combination. I also wanted to reverse the process. Is this possible?

我们两清 提交于 2019-12-05 07:35:22
问题 I have a string which contains 3 elements: a 3 digit code (example: SIN, ABD, SMS, etc) a 1 digit code type (example: 1, 2, 3, etc) a 3 digit number (example: 500, 123, 345) Example string: SIN1500, ABD2123, SMS3345, etc.. I wanted to generate a UNIQUE 10 digit alphanumeric and case sensitive string (only 0-9/a-z/A-Z is allowed), with more than 2^30 (about 1 billion) unique combination per string supplied. The generated code must have a particular algorithm so that I can reverse the process.

How can I calculate the checksum of code at runtime?

故事扮演 提交于 2019-12-05 07:06:05
问题 I have a C#.NET application running on a machine. How do I calculate the checksum of the entire code at runtime? Note: I do not want to calculate the checksum of the image in use but the actual code part. 回答1: I have never used this, but: Using reflection you can navigate to the GetILAsByteArray and do a checksum (per method). But I think it will be a lot easier to use code signing or the Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly and then do a checksum on the .dll or .exe. 回答2: I would just use code

Adler32 Repeating Very Quickly

和自甴很熟 提交于 2019-12-05 01:00:34
问题 I'm using the adler32 checksum algorithm to generate a number from a database id. So, when I insert a row into the database, I take the identity of that row and use it to create the checksum. The problem that I'm running into is that I just generated a repeat checksum after only 207 inserts into the database. This is much much faster than I expected. Here is my code: String dbIdStr = Long.toString(dbId); byte[] bytes = dbIdStr.getBytes(); Checksum checksum = new Adler32(); checksum.update