call

Following the instructions from this page: http://www.magento.cc/how-to-use-php-on-a-cms-page.html 1) i declared the module in the app/etc/modules : <?xml version="1.0"?> <config> <modules> <Stock_status> <active>true</active> <codePool>local</codePool> </Stock_status> </modules> </config> 2) Then i created the config.xml in app\code\local\Stock\status\Custom\etc with these contents in it: <?xml version="1.0"?> <config> <global> <blocks> <Stock_status> <class>Stock_status_Block</class> </Stock_status> </blocks> </global> </config> 3) afterwards i created a test.php in app/code/local/Stock

My question is why are there 6T states in opcode fetch of the CALL instruction while there are 4 for other instructions in 8085 microprocessor. I have searched a lot but didn't find any satisfactory answer. Here: http://www.edaboard.com/thread201650.html it says that it has something to do with dual addressing modes being used in case of CALL. But doesn't really explain why 6T states. Any idea? EDIT This question arose when I came to know that CALL takes 18 T-states. According to my calculations it should be: 4(for opcode fetch) + 3 + 3 (two memory reads to read the subroutine address) + 3 + 3

Just out of interest , is it possible to call a C module from a java module ? If so , how to do that ? yes you can use Java Native Interface to do this: Yes, you can do it. Whether you should do it is another matter. On the pro side: Calling C libraries from Java will avoid the need to recode the libraries in Java (but see below). For some computational intensive algorithms, a well-written C implementation may be faster than an equivalently well-written Java version. Some operating system specific operations cannot be implemented in pure Java. On the con side: There is a greater overhead in

My problem is: in firefox i got no response. in ie it worked fine. I want a ajax call to a local script getting some information in plain text or something else. but it won't work. I think cross scripting should not a problem at this point or? the javascript code is simple: var targetUrl = "http://localhost/jQueryProxy.php"; var parameters = ""; // later $.ajax({ type: "GET", async: true, url: targetUrl, data: parameters, success: function(param1, param2){ alert(param1); } }); and the php code too: <?php header('Content-type: text/xml')); echo "test"; ?> Kobi try var targetUrl = "/jQueryProxy

The assembly code goes like this: call next next: popl %eax I thought after call next , the return address will be pushed onto the stack, right? But in the above code, what's the return address? After that code executes %eax will have the address of label "next" the call branches to the target which happens to be the next sequential instruction and pushes the return address, which is always the address of the next sequential instruction the popl will pop the return address from the stack onto %eax register The net effect is %eax points to label "next" It's the address of the instruction

I want my c# UWP App to support calling numbers. When I'm on W10 mobile I want it to use W10 PhoneCall API normal (this is working) Windows.ApplicationModel.Calls.PhoneCallManager.ShowPhoneCallUI(number, name); but on W10 Desktop/PC I won't have a GSM provider, so I thought, maybe use skype to call the number, the user pressed. Is that possible via UWP? Maybe similar like opening websites: await Windows.System.Launcher.LaunchUriAsync(new Uri(website)); Yes， it's possible and you're right about using Launch the default app for a URI to open Skype from your app. For the question what Uri can we