bytecode

Understanding STG

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2019-12-03 01:37:56
问题 The design of GHC is based on something called STG, which stands for "spineless, tagless G-machine". Now G-machine is apparently short for "graph reduction machine", which defines how laziness is implemented. Unevaluated thunks are stored as an expression tree, and executing the program involves reducing these down to normal form. (A tree is an acyclic graph, but Haskell's pervasive recursion means that Haskell expressions form general graphs , hence graph-reduction and not tree-reduction.)

How do I byte-compile everything in my .emacs.d directory?

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-12-03 01:29:04
问题 I have decided to check out Emacs, and I liked it very much. Now, I'm using the Emacs Starter Kit, which sort of provides better defaults and some nice customizations to default install of Emacs. I have customized it a little, added some stuff like yasnippet, color-themes, unbound, and other stuff. I've set up a github repository where I keep all of the customizations so I can access them from multiple places or in case something goes bad and I lose my .emacs.d directory. All of this is very

Java bytecode specification [closed]

亡梦爱人 提交于 2019-12-03 00:47:55
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed last year . Is there a nice place for learning the JVM bytecode instruction set. The specification perhaps and maybe some tutorials? I ask because I would like to design a toy language and a compiler for it that generates JVM bytecode. Thanks for your knowledge and perhaps googling. 回答1: A good reference for Java bytecode

What kind of Java code requires stackmap frames?

戏子无情 提交于 2019-12-02 22:56:22
I'm trying to write a unit tests for a workaround to an issue about missing stackmap frames , but for that purpose I will need to generate a class that will fail to validate on Java 8 if it's missing stackmap frames. Below you can see my test case (dependencies: ASM, Guava, JUnit). It removes the stackmap frames from the GuineaPig class in hopes of causing its bytecode to fail to validate. The part that I'm having problems with is filling in the TODO in GuineaPig with minimal code that requires stackmap frames, so that the test would pass. import com.google.common.io.*; import org.junit.*;

Why is it so easy to decompile .NET IL code?

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2019-12-02 22:50:28
Why is it so easy to decompile .NET IL-code into source code, compared to decompiling native x86 binaries? (Reflector produces quite good source code most of the time, while decompiling the output of a C++ compiler is almost impossible.) Is it because IL contains a lot of meta data? Or is it because IL is a higher abstraction than x86 instructions? I did some research and found the following two usefull articles, but neither of them answers my question. MSIL Decompiler Theory C Decompiler - Quick primer I think you've got the most important bits already. As you say, there's more metadata

Developing a heuristic to test simple anonymous Python functions for equivalency

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-12-02 20:51:39
I know how function comparison works in Python 3 (just comparing address in memory), and I understand why. I also understand that "true" comparison (do functions f and g return the same result given the same arguments, for any arguments?) is practically impossible. I am looking for something in between. I want the comparison to work on the simplest cases of identical functions, and possibly some less trivial ones: lambda x : x == lambda x : x # True lambda x : 2 * x == lambda y : 2 * y # True lambda x : 2 * x == lambda x : x * 2 # True or False is fine, but must be stable lambda x : 2 * x ==

Why not sending JavaScript files in browser-specific bytecode? [closed]

你。 提交于 2019-12-02 20:08:56
问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 4 years ago . There is no universal bytecode for JavaScript, but most JavaScript engines have their own bytecode. Since JavaScript files travel as source code string, they have to parse/compile source code string into bytecode at before execution. However, as we can specify a user agent

ASM 5.0.3 With Java 1.8 incorrect maxStack with Java.lang.VerifyError: Operand stack overflow

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-12-02 18:24:43
问题 Using ASM 5.0.3 (with Java 1.8.0_65 & Tomcat 8.0.30) , Visiting one of the JSP (date.jsp) Method - _JSP(_jspService) , getting below exception javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.VerifyError: Operand stack overflow Exception Details: Location: org/apache/jsp/jsp/dates/date_jsp._jspService(Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;)V @0: aload_1 Reason: Exceeded max stack size. Current Frame: bci: @0 flags: { } locals: { 'org/apache/jsp/jsp/dates/date

Can you inspect the byte code of a Java 8 lambda at runtime?

核能气质少年 提交于 2019-12-02 17:35:00
If you have an anonymous class like Predicate<String> isEmpty = new Predicate<String>() { public boolean test(String t) { return t.isEmpty(); } }; A library which is passed the reference to isEmpty can inspect the byte code to see what it does and possibly manipulate it. Is there a way you can do this for lambdas? Predicate<String> isEmpty = String::isEmpty; e.g Say have this code and byte code public class Main { public static void test(Predicate<String> tester) { System.out.println("tester.getClass()= " + tester.getClass()); System.out.println("tester.getClass().getClassLoader()="+ tester

How to create a code object in python?

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-12-02 17:17:55
I'd like to create a new code object with the function types.CodeType() . There is almost no documentation about this and the existing one says "not for faint of heart" Tell me what i need and give me some information about each argument passed to types.CodeType , possibly posting an example. Note : In normal use cases you will just need the builtin function compile() You should use types.CodeType() only if you want to create new instructions that couldn't be obtained writing normal source code and that require direct access to bytecode. Alberto Perrella ––––––––––– Disclaimer : Documentation