built-in

问题 In Visual Studio 2010 Pro, how can I easily convert a classic assembly to a ms unit test assembly ? It there a flag to activate in the .csproj file ? 回答1: The problem is that test projects are "marked" on the project file - you can convert a class library to Test project follow these four simple steps: Unload the project (.prj) file and then open it for update. add the following line to the project C#: <Project> <PropertyGroup> <AssemblyName>....</AssemblyName> <!-- add this line below -->

问题 In Visual Studio 2010 Pro, how can I easily convert a classic assembly to a ms unit test assembly ? It there a flag to activate in the .csproj file ? 回答1: The problem is that test projects are "marked" on the project file - you can convert a class library to Test project follow these four simple steps: Unload the project (.prj) file and then open it for update. add the following line to the project C#: <Project> <PropertyGroup> <AssemblyName>....</AssemblyName> <!-- add this line below -->

问题 In Visual Studio 2010 Pro, how can I easily convert a classic assembly to a ms unit test assembly ? It there a flag to activate in the .csproj file ? 回答1: The problem is that test projects are "marked" on the project file - you can convert a class library to Test project follow these four simple steps: Unload the project (.prj) file and then open it for update. add the following line to the project C#: <Project> <PropertyGroup> <AssemblyName>....</AssemblyName> <!-- add this line below -->

问题 Correct me if I am wrong, but doing something like var typeOfName = typeof(Foo).Name; and var nameOfName = nameof(Foo); should give you exactly the same output. One of the understandable reasons according to this source: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn986596.aspx is that "Using nameof helps keep your code valid when renaming definitions" If you want to get the class instance as string it is not possible to do something like that: var fooInstance = new Foo(); var nameOfName =

问题 Correct me if I am wrong, but doing something like var typeOfName = typeof(Foo).Name; and var nameOfName = nameof(Foo); should give you exactly the same output. One of the understandable reasons according to this source: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn986596.aspx is that "Using nameof helps keep your code valid when renaming definitions" If you want to get the class instance as string it is not possible to do something like that: var fooInstance = new Foo(); var nameOfName =

问题 Correct me if I am wrong, but doing something like var typeOfName = typeof(Foo).Name; and var nameOfName = nameof(Foo); should give you exactly the same output. One of the understandable reasons according to this source: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn986596.aspx is that "Using nameof helps keep your code valid when renaming definitions" If you want to get the class instance as string it is not possible to do something like that: var fooInstance = new Foo(); var nameOfName =

问题 Given 2 sequences of different lengths: In [931]: a = [1,2,3] In [932]: b = [4,5,6,7] This is what i want In [933]: c = zip(reversed(a),reversed(b)) In [934]: [x for x in reversed(c)] Out[934]: [(1, 5), (2, 6), (3, 7)] But I don't like the idea of using reversed on all my input parameters, and I also don't want to re-implement my own zip function. So: Is there a faster/more efficient way to do this? Is there a simpler way to do this? 回答1: The following is faster and clearer than the other

问题 Given 2 sequences of different lengths: In [931]: a = [1,2,3] In [932]: b = [4,5,6,7] This is what i want In [933]: c = zip(reversed(a),reversed(b)) In [934]: [x for x in reversed(c)] Out[934]: [(1, 5), (2, 6), (3, 7)] But I don't like the idea of using reversed on all my input parameters, and I also don't want to re-implement my own zip function. So: Is there a faster/more efficient way to do this? Is there a simpler way to do this? 回答1: The following is faster and clearer than the other

问题 I am working with multilingual text data, among others with Russian using the Cyrillic alphabet and Turkish. I basically have to compare the words in two files my_file and check_file and if the words in my_file can be found in check_file , write them in an output file keeping the meta-information about these words from both input files. Some words are lowercased while other words are capitalised so I have to lowercase all the words to compare them. As I use Python 3.6.5 and Python 3 uses

问题 When I try to view the built-in function all() in PyCharm, I could just see "pass" in the function body. How to view the actual implementation so that I could know what exactly the built-in function is doing? def all(*args, **kwargs): # real signature unknown """ Return True if bool(x) is True for all values x in the iterable. If the iterable is empty, return True. """ pass 回答1: Assuming you’re using the usual CPython interpreter, all is a builtin function object, which just has a pointer to