breakpoints

I tried to make breakpoint in the class from JRE System Library, but when I started debug I recieved message: "Unable to install breakpoint at ... due to missing line number attributes. Modify compiler options to generate line number attributes." So what should I do: recompile JRE System Library from sources with debug information and use it? Or there is some more simple way? So, the most simple way - to use JDK instead of JRE. In this case we can use breakpoints in system library. BUT we cant monitor values of local variables. For this purpose we should recompile rt.jar (without sun.* packets

I am working with mixed mode assemblies in C++/CLI. All managed mode assembled pdb's get loaded when successfully in mixed mode assembly, but native dll's and pdb's are not getting loaded even though the information of native pdb's is shown in the Modules pane (i.e. in VS Debug->Windows->Modules). I am using native dll and calling its exported function in mixed assembly in C++/CLI code. Here, functions get called successfully, but native pdb symbols are not loading and all breakpoints in the native code are shown as hollow circle and tool tips says there are no symbols loaded for this. I have

Some part of a big code base is printing out weird NSLog statements, and I'm trying to detect where it's coming from. Is there a way to put 1 breakpoint at the start of every NSLog call so I can see where it's being called from, rather than manually have to put breakpoints on all places that call NSLog ? Pang In Xcode 6 : Step 1 : On the Navigator on the left, go to Breakpoint Navigator ( command ⌘ + 7 ): Step 2 : Click the + button on the bottom left ( Add a new breakpoint ), then choose Add Symbolic Breakpoint... : Step 3 : In Symbol , type NSLog . Alternatively, you can do the same thing in

The documentation for Eclipse states that a blue circle icon represents an enabled line breakpoint and that a checkmark is an adornment that marks a line breakpoints as installed What's the difference between active, installed and enabled, when referring to breakpoints? Is installed -- in this case -- an Eclipse-specific definition? This thread (2002!) has a good explanation for installed breakpoints Blue breakpoints mean that the breakpoint is not installed. In older builds, a green icon means that the breakpoint was successfully installed. An installed breakpoint means that the class has

I have an ASP.NET web aplication using vs2008. It used to let me hit my break points but for some unknown reason in this site it won't let me hit them any more. I have set everything to debug and re built about a million times and everything else but can't seem to hit that damn break point!!! Break points work for the site but not the class libraries I add in, but they used to!! I can't see anything in the web config or the configurations to change anything. I've added the class library to a test solution, works fine. Does anyone have any ideas? Just to confirm, breakpoints work for the site

I am writing assembly-level optimized code, and I need to make sure that the C++ compiler is working with it correctly in Release-Mode. I used to be able to get Release-Mode programs to break on breakpoints in VS 2002 (and display the raw disassembly as I stepped through it), but I can't remember how I got that to work. Does VS 2010 have any options that might allow this to happen? Compile with /Zi and link with /DEBUG and you'll be able to set breakpoints. Under a project's Properties dialog: /Zi can be enabled in C++ --> General --> Debug Information Format /DEBUG can be enabled in Linker --

This has been happening increasingly, when I have a sheets.add or sheets.delete in excel VBA. After searching and searching I finally found the official Microsoft support page on it. My question is, does anyone know why I could have stepped through this code just fine over and over, and then all of a sudden it starts doing what Microsoft says it would always do, and is there a way to fix it? Sub foo() Sheets.add debug.print "sheet added" 'breakpoint here End sub It's as simple as that. You won't be able to recreate it, because the issue I'm asking about is the fact that it doesn't happen at