branch

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have across a very weird issue. I try to pip install a package from my github fork. I have done this multiple times in the past and it works always. This is what I do: pip install git+https...@my_branch While this works perfectly in my local machine, when I try to w Windows Remote machine and to my Ubuntu Vagrant box it doesnt work. Instead of installing the package with my_branch, it installs the master branch. Initially I thought it was related with an outdated version of pip but after upgrading to the latest version, I keep facing the

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I had a feature branch of my trunk and was merging changes from my trunk into my branch periodically and everything was working fine. Today I went to merge the branch back down into the trunk and any of the files that were added to my trunk after the creation of my branch were flagged as a "tree conflict". Is there a way to avoid this in the future? I don't think these are being properly flagged. 回答1: I found the solution reading the link that Gary gave (and I suggest to follow this way). Summarizing to resolve the tree conflict committing

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: I'm trying to build a command line app to fetch artifacts from teamcity. This is fine if I know the branch I want to get but I want to show a list of all the available branches first. This is what I have to fetch the latest build when I know the branch http : //<TC>/guestAuth/app/rest/builds/buildType:<BUILD-TYPE>,branch:<BRANCH> But if I take the ,branch:<BRANCH> off it only shows one build which is the latest on the default branch I think. What I can't find is a URL to get the branches on a particular plan. I can go back to the

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I've a "problem" with svn I can't understand why sometimes when I merge two branches it reports modify on mergeinfo property on files with no changes on the text. Is it a normal behavior? If not, what can be the problem? 回答1: Well, you did merge those two branches. Right? Works as expected. What you did was do a merge. Even though the merge didn't result in any code changes, and that's not uncommon with merges, Subversion still marks that a merge was done. If nothing else, marking that you did a merge -- even though it resulted in no changes

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I keep hearing that branching in git is so much easier than in SVN, because it's easier to merge the branch back to trunk/master. I've read some tutorials, but they only covered basic merge conflicts ("Alice changed line 8 of code.cpp and at the same time Bob changed line 8 of code.cpp...") and there are no differences between SVN and all other distributed source control systems. Can you give me the examples of changes in branch that would cause troubles in SVN repository, but would be handled gracefully by git? 回答1: I finally had some time

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: Backstory : Got a job as an entry level web developer. Head developer leaves right when I start. All responsibility on me. Never used SVN. Going in blind. Problem : I keep getting errors like 'svn://svn/svn/xxx/project_name/branches/dev@330' must be ancestrally related to 'svn://svn/svn/xxx/project_name/trunk@326' The process by which I am starting the new project is: Make a directory for the project on my computer with subfolders: project_name/branches project_name/branches/dev project_name/tags project_name/trunk Right click the project

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 选择语言 中文(简体) 日语 英语 中文(繁体) 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: I have a local Git repo that I would like to push to a new remote repo (brand new repo set up on Beanstalk, if that matters). My local repo has a few branches and tags and I would like to keep all of my history. It looks like I basically just need to do a git push, but that only uploads the master branch. How do I push everything so I get a full replica of my local repo on the remote? 回答1: To push all your branches , use either (replace REMOTE with the name of the remote, for example "origin"): git push

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: On current Git, is there a material difference between git push --force-with-lease origin +somebranch , git push --force-with-lease origin somebranch and git push origin +somebranch (without a plus)? All three seem to do the same thing. I tried to look for documentation. I tried to look at refspec in documentation , but I don't know if there is a difference and if so, which would one should prefer by default when I like to pull to work branch via git pull --rebase origin master , for instance. 回答1: This is a good question; the documentation

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: Say I am in a bare repository (a remote), if I try to delete a branch with git branch -d <branch_name> I get the following error: fatal : Couldn 't look up commit object for HEAD Why? Is there a reason why I should be unable to delete branches from a bare repository? 回答1: Make sure you use a capitol D in the command, in this case you would type git branch -D <branch_name> . Note that this will only delete the branch from your local computer If you are trying to delete a remote branch, type git push origin :<branch_name> (remember