branch

TFS — Sustainability of Cascading Branches

℡╲_俬逩灬. 提交于 2019-12-03 20:34:09
Branching guidance usually describes an immortal "Main" branch, with features branched from Main, and merged back to Main, and Releases branched from Main, with further branches of a Release as necessary for Service Packs, RTMs, etc. The guidance regarding Main is often simplified to "no trash in Main." I'm working with a group that releases regularly (as often as monthly) and serially. To them it seems unnecessary to ever return work to the Main branch. They use TFS 2010--diagramatically their branching structure looks like this: Daily builds on a branch are made; eventually the branch goes

What will git checkout master + git reset --hard do?

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-12-03 20:09:13
I 'm relatively new to git and and having some problems early on. I've made several commits, but when I try to push them I get a response that says everything is up-to-date. I feel like my problem is the same on listed in this question , but it recommends the following: $ git log -1 # note the SHA-1 of latest commit $ git checkout master # reset your branch head to your previously detached commit $ git reset --hard <commit-id> What exactly will "checking out the master" do? I just don't want to lose the changes I've made... screenshot of gitk: Checking out a branch moves the local HEAD pointer

Branch target prediction in conjunction with branch prediction?

冷暖自知 提交于 2019-12-03 18:48:17
问题 EDIT: My confusion arises because surely by predicting which branch is taken, you are effectively doing the target prediction too?? This question is intrinsically linked to my first question on the topic: branch prediction vs branch target prediction Looking at the accepted answer: Unconditional branch, fixed target Infinite loop goto statement break or continue statement End of the 'then' clause of an if/else statement (to jump past the else clause) Non-virtual function call Unconditional

git: how do I merge between branches while keeping some changesets exclusive to one branch?

南楼画角 提交于 2019-12-03 18:43:56
问题 There's a special place in hell for people who hardcode absolute paths and database credentials into multiple random places in web applications. Sadly, before they go to hell they're wreaking havoc on Earth. And we have to deal with their code. I have to perform a few small changes to one of such web applications. I create a new branch features , and perform a global find & replace to update the paths and credentials to my local environment. I commit that. I also tag this as local . I merrily

git从已有分支拉新分支开发

两盒软妹~` 提交于 2019-12-03 18:20:58
开发过程中经常用到从master分支copy一个开发分支,下面我们就用命令行完成这个操作: 1. 切换到被copy的分支(master),并且从远端拉取最新版本 $git checkout master $git pull 2. 从当前分支拉copy开发分支 $git checkout -b dev Switched to a new branch 'dev' 3. 把新建的分支push到远端 $git push origin dev 4. 拉取远端分支 $git pull There is no tracking information for the current branch. Please specify which branch you want to merge with. See git-pull(1) for details. git pull <remote> <branch> If you wish to set tracking information for this branch you can do so with: git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/<branch> dev 经过验证,当前的分支并没有和本地分支关联,根据提示进行下一步: 5. 关联 $git branch --set-upstream-to

Are there different meanings to the concept of 'tracking' in git?

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-12-03 17:28:47
问题 I run 'git branch -r' and get origin/branch1 origin/branch2 From the man page, the -r option will "list or delete (if used with -d) the remote-tracking branches". So origin/branch1 and origin/branch2 are known as remote-tracking branches. However, you can't commit directly onto a remote-tracking branch (an anonymous branch will be created instead). A remote-tracking branch simply tracks a remote branch when running 'git fetch'. Here's where the semantics get a little blurry for me. If I then

How to update my new branch in a forked github repo

雨燕双飞 提交于 2019-12-03 17:16:56
I forked a public repo on github to do some changes. I created a new branch and implemented my changes there. Now I want to get the new commits from the upstream repo, but I was just able to sync the upstream commits to my master repo not to the new branch. How do I sync from upstream to my new branch instead of master? VonC How do I sync from upstream to my new branch instead of master? You are supposed to sync master first, then rebase your branch on top of the newly updated master . git pull upstream master git checkout yourBranch git rebase master git push -f origin yourBranch That

How to fix TFS incorrect branching

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2019-12-03 17:09:13
We have a project that is in TFS 2010 and was incorrectly branched. We want to fix it. This is the current structure we have: Development Integration Main The problem is that Main is a branch of Integration , which in turn is branch of Development , when it should be the very opposite. In other words, first it was created Development, then branched Integration and then Main. Now all three branches have same code (were merged). So, Is it possible to fix the TFS references to have the right flow: Main -> Integration -> Development ? As far as I know, there is no way to make this change behind

Git rebase branch with merged children

╄→尐↘猪︶ㄣ 提交于 2019-12-03 16:32:33
问题 Today I faced with one problem. My teammate created branch from master. He developed one feature in this branch and after that developed two subfeatures in subfeature's branches. At last he did two refactoring commit of the entire thing. So... C--D E--F | subfeatures / \ / \ B------M1------M2--G--H | feature / A-------------------K | master Usually we rebase feature branches before no-fast-forward merge it into master. But of course this rebase fails. Rebased feature branch became looking

How to version resources that are shared across projects

三世轮回 提交于 2019-12-03 16:30:24
We use Team Foundation Server and have numerous ASP.NET Web Application Projects. Each of the Web Apps uses a custom content management system that we've developed in house. The CMS is itself, an ASP.NET web app. When deployed, the CMS resides in a subdirectory, such as "/Admin". The CMS is comprised of .aspx and ascx files, and the corresponding assemblies are, of course, placed in the bin. Presently, the CMS files exist separately for each Web App in source control. In other words, an "Admin" folder exists in each web application that depends on the CMS. This poses obvious challenges since