branch

deleting remote branch does not remove from GitHub

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-12-04 12:40:11
I have a local branch, say hotfix . I put it up on GitHub using $ git push -u origin hotfix Then after merging the branch, I want to delete it. So I type $ git branch -d hotfix which deletes the branch locally. However, the remote branch is still on GitHub. Of course when I look at my remote branches, $ git branch -r origin/HEAD -> origin/master origin/hotfix origin/master hotfix is still there. So then I try $ git branch -r -d origin/hotfix $ git branch -r origin/HEAD -> origin/master origin/master and hotfix is gone, as expected. But then I go to GitHub and look at my branches, and hotfix is

Show Current Git Branch in Xcode 4.2

…衆ロ難τιáo~ 提交于 2019-12-04 12:38:29
This is a simple question that has been bugging me. In XCode 4.2, is there anyway to display the git branch that is currently being edited? I know I can see this from the organizer (or do it from the command line), but what I want to see is the branch name up there in lights next to the project and file name in XCode itself - which is the tool I use 99.9% of the time. From what I can see from " XCode4 User Guide ", the organizer view remains the only way to quickly see the current branch (as you already knew). There doesn't seem to be an overlay added to the other views in XCode4, no overlay

git staging and committing between multiple branches

百般思念 提交于 2019-12-04 10:29:53
问题 I clearly do not understand git at all. This is what I'm getting: git branch (outputs that I'm on master) git checkout -b foo echo "next line" >> file (file is an existing file) git add file (stages) git checkout master git status (shows that file has "next line" and is staged!!) git commit (commits the changes that were staged on branch foo!!) git checkout foo Here is the kicker. foo now doesn't show any changes made to file in the working directory OR staged. So looks like - any changes you

Limit on number of git branches

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-12-04 10:03:07
问题 I am musing about building a big system on top of git for various reasons but mainly convenience. But as part of the implementation I would end up making millions of branches and branching and merging between them. Can git actually scale this way? I always hear "Branches are free" but I have to wonder if this is really true x1,000,000? Can git actually create a theoretical unlimited number of branches? 回答1: Yes, branches are free. Branching and merging is very easy. The scalability issues

Is there any way to commit changes that I've made to my SVN checkout of trunk to a branch instead?

懵懂的女人 提交于 2019-12-04 09:45:22
问题 I just started working on some changes against trunk on an SVN repo, thinking they would be somewhat small. Now, I actually am beginning to realize that I probably should have just started a new branch instead. Rather than making a branch, and then moving each individual piece into it, is there any way to make a new branch and then commit the changes in my working copy to it? 回答1: make a new branch from the place where you started developing switch to the newly created branch commit the local

Git Switching branch

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2019-12-04 09:24:45
问题 There is somthing I don't get yet with git. It is branch. So let say that I have a local repository A which I clone from a remote one B . So now A have the master branch checked out. So when I push from A it goes to B master. B is just a clone on github, a clone of C . From time to time in other to get in sync I pull from C master branch. But now C master branch is quite broken for the time being. Since from A I had pull from C my local A is also bugy. So I would like from A to pull the C

Perforce, How to integrate a change to another branch?

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-12-04 08:23:40
问题 I have trunk and a release branch. If I fixed a bug in release branch, I definitely should integrate the fix back to trunk. However, I didn't find a command dedicated to integrate such a single change list; did I miss something? 回答1: To integrate changelist 100, for example, you'd use: p4 merge //releasebranch/...@=100 //trunk/... p4 resolve p4 submit (If you have an older Perforce server you'll have to use 'integ' instead of 'merge'.) Note that '@=100' means the same thing as '@100,100' in

How do I configure Git to automatically pull from current branch when using “git pull”?

馋奶兔 提交于 2019-12-04 08:09:07
问题 With our current setup you always have to enter the branch name (ie: git pull origin feature-branch " when doing a pull. I've already made the mistake of pulling from one branch into another, accidentally merging two branches with two very different releases. I'd like to avoid this by configuring Git so that simply typing git pull will pull the current branch you're in. How do I do this? 回答1: You can create a tracking branch. From the Git Book (http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Branching-Remote

creating git branch after the fact?

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-12-04 08:02:52
问题 I suspect the answer to my problem is fairly simple, but I'm a git newbie and my head is getting confused at reading answers to all the similar SoF questions that don't seem to be quite my problem. Here's my problem: I have a repo at github with a single branch ('master') that I've been working on in my local repo. At some point I stopped pushing commits back up to master on github because I was worried that they'd break things. So now I have lots of commits in my local repo that I want to

Git push everything to new origin

点点圈 提交于 2019-12-04 07:57:19
问题 I deleted my previous git origin, and created a new one. I did git add . and git commit. But it will update changes, how do i push everything into the new origin 回答1: git remote add origin <address> git push origin <branchname> 回答2: (works with git 1.8.4) If you want to push all branches at once: git push <URL> --all To push all the tags : git push <URL> --tags 回答3: Hmmmm I just did this. I am not sure if you did exactly the same but I had a different method. I setup a bare repo on "newserver