branch

Typical usage scenario: I have master, branch_foo and branch_bar. All are up to date. Now, I do a "git checkout master" and work on a bug fix. Lets say that fix was on a tracked file that is in the same state on all branches - ie. before the fix, a diff of the file from each branch results in no differences. Is there a way to commit this fix to all branches? Tim Henigan I expect git cherry-pick is what you want. After committing the fix to the first branch, you can use git cherry-pick to merge it into each of the other branches. This related question on SO may be of interest: Git & Working on

关于Git 分支管理 查看分支： git branch // 会展示出所有的分支列表星号为当前 创建分支： git branch <name> 切换分支： git checkout <name> 创建并切换分支： git checkout -b <name> 合并某分支到当前分支： git merge <name> 删除分支： git branch -d <name> 创建空分支： git checkout --orphan <branchname> 然后删除掉里面的文件 git rm -rf . 分支管理 master分支应该是非常稳定的，也就是仅用来发布新版本，平时不能在上面干活 dev 分支用来开发，等要发布的时候，再把 dev 分支合并到 master 上，在 master 分支发布1.0版本 在合并的时候加上 --no-ff 参数可以使用普通模式合并，合并后的历史会有分支记录 git merge --no--ff -m "注释" dev 因为本次合并要创建一个新的commit，所以加上-m参数并写上描述 远程仓库一般只维护两个分支 master 和 dev 其他分支一般在本地操作即可，如果需要其他人共同开发这个分支，可以推送到远程服务器 分支的好处在于同时进行多个任务的时候。比如正在任务A，只进行了一半，突然有bugB需要修改，那么可以在本地单独创建一个修改bugB的分支

We are on TFS 2010 and clients being used are VS 2008, VS 2010 and VS 2012. I use the VS 2010 feature to view TFS hierarchy feature to visualize my TFS branch setup and maintain it. Question, is that once the work on a branch is complete, I right click and 'Delete' it. After deletion, if I open hierarchy visualization again, sometimes branch box gets removed from the visualization as expected, but sometimes, even though the branch is deleted, it refused to go away from the visualization. Why is it suck, and how can I remove the deleted branch from the visualization? In source control explorer

I'm working with an SVN repository that is laid out like this: $SVN/[project]/trunk $SVN/[project]/branches/[user]/[branch] $SVN/[project]/tags/releases/[tag] My .git/config looks like this: [svn-remote "svn"] url = $SVN fetch = project/trunk:refs/remotes/trunk branches = project/branches/*/*:refs/remotes/* When I look at git branch -a, I see all the remote branches. Let's say I want to check one out, work on it, then commit the changes back. Here's is what I am trying to do: git checkout -b comments erik/comments .... work, commit locally .... git svn dcommit However, dcommit always pushes to

We've already learned how to switch which branch points to what using git branch -m . If I do this, is it going to make life difficult for the other people pulling from my repository? Say I do a bunch of stuff on a branch topic1 and then do a git branch -m master old_master git branch -m topic1 master git push origin master and then somebody else pulls master from the my remote repository, what will they have to do to make everything point to the right place? Will I have to tell everybody to repeat my steps? Is this akin to the problem of rebasing commits after pushing them and leaving other

My company has a piece of software we sell to multiple customers. But every customer have some different requirements (more than just "Put our logo here" ). The core is the same for all of them, but some does not need certain modules, others need them all including modifications. I would like to manage all of this in a single git repository so I have the same core for them all, but I'm not quite sure how to do this the best way. I read about Git Flow , and how to make a single project succesful regarding branches , which gives a branch model like this: (source: nvie.com ) Now, we have multiple

git branch -m old_branch new_branch # Rename branch locally git push origin :old_branch # Delete the old branch git push --set-upstream origin new_branch # Push the new branch, set local branch to track the new remote 来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/fubinhnust/p/11908934.html

We use Git hosted in Azure DevOps for all of our source code. So far we have used Git Hooks to ensure that team members follow a branch naming convention {branchtype}/{username}/{friendlyname}/{workitemtype}{workitemid} . Examples: dev/dparkar/addauth/ta123456 hf/jsmith/memoryleak/bu11111 The branch naming convention allow us to clearly understand whether it's a regular development branch or a hotfix branch and which work item it is associated with, among other things. To setup Git Hooks locally, team members were required to run a script locally before starting to contribute. This was fine as

一、安装 1.1windows 要在Windows系统中安装Git，请访问http://msysgit.github.io/，并单击Download。安装。 1.2 在 Linux 系统中安装 Git 要在Linux系统中安装Git，请执行如下命令即可： sudo apt-get install git 1.3 在 OS X 系统中安装 Git 你的OS X系统可能已经安装了Git，因此请尝试执行命令git --version。如果你在输出中看 到了具体的版本号，说明你的系统安装了Git；如果你看到一条消息，提示你安装或升级Git，只 需按屏幕上的说明做即可。 你也可以访问https://git-scm.com/，单击链接Downloads，再单击适合你所用系统的安装程序 二、Git的配置 Git跟踪谁修改了项目，哪怕参与项目开发的人只有一个。为此， Git需要知道你的用户名和 电子邮件地址。你必须提供用户名，但可以使用虚构的电子邮件地址（会在提交时提醒输入：八步）： $ git config --global user.name "username" $ git config --global user.email "username@example.com" 三、创建项目 我们来创建一个要进行版本控制的项目。在你的系统中创建一个文件夹，并将其命名为 git_practice

I just started using git and started collaborating with other developers on same code. I have worked a little with SVN before but never had to collaborate with other people on my codebase. Now with collaborators working on same code, I need an efficient workflow. While searching for such, I found this , and it seems like a good workflow for our requirement. My repository resides in a local machine. I created the repository with git init --bare . I added the initial codes to master and pushed it. Then I added a "develop" branch using git branch develop; git push -u origin develop . Now I want