branch

I have developed a website that now has to be cloned for several clients. Each client wants customizations that go beyond visual aspects and cannot be handled by profiles, preferences or something like that. With this scenario, I would like to mantain a master repository in Git with the common code, and then one branch for each client. This way, I can make individual changes in every client (branch) and share common changes as well (using the master). Is this approach correct? Is there any other way to handle this apart from remote branches? Thanks! This will work. You have to be careful with

1. 基本描述 　　本章主要讲解各种子查询。 2. 基本样例 SELECT account_id, product_cd, cust_id, avail_balance FROM account WHERE account_id = (SELECT MAX(account_id) FROM account); SELECT account_id, product_cd, cust_id, avail_balance FROM account WHERE open_emp_id <> (SELECT e.emp_id FROM employee e INNER JOIN branch b ON e.assigned_branch_id = b.branch_id WHERE e.title = "Head Teller" AND b.city = "Woburn"); SELECT branch_id, name, city FROM branch WHERE name IN ("Headquarters", "Quincy Branch"); SELECT branch_id, name, city FROM branch WHERE name = "Headquarters" OR name = "Quincy Branch"; SELECT emp_id, fname,

1. 基本描述 　　本章主要讲解内连接。 2. 基本样例 DESC employee; DESC department; SELECT e.fname, e.lname, d.name FROM employee e JOIN department d; SELECT e.fname, e.lname, d.name FROM employee e JOIN department d ON e.dept_id = d.dept_id; SELECT e.fname, e.lname, d.name FROM employee e INNER JOIN department d ON e.dept_id = d.dept_id; SELECT e.fname, e.lname, d.name FROM employee e INNER JOIN department d USING (dept_id); SELECT e.fname, e.lname, d.name FROM employee e, department d WHERE e.dept_id = d.dept_id; SELECT a.account_id, a.cust_id, a.open_date, a.product_cd FROM account a, branch b, employee e WHERE a

My understanding of a baseless merge in TFS was that it was a one-time deal, and merges afterwards could be made without having to be baseless: from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bd6dxhfy(VS.80).aspx /baseless - Performs a merge without a basis version. That is, allows the user to merge files and folders that do not have a merge relationship. After a baseless merge, a merge relationship exists and future merges do not have to be baseless. However, I tried it this evening with the following setup: /Trunk | - Dev | - QA | - Stage tf merge C:\src\Project\Branch\Dev\ C:\src\Project

I am building a Rails app that I manage with Git. All is perfect, but I'd like keep a public version as well as a private one. That is: the public version is for a public repository (for people to use), and the private version is for my own site. The idea is that both versions should be up-to-date, with the difference that my private version's files contain passwords for my site, and the public version doesn't (or contains some default values as such). I've been thinking of branches: master (the public version) and some private one. But it seems that I'd have to do a lot of merging after each

A colleague, whom we'll call Aaron, was assigned to renovate a section of a website as a long-term project. He created a new Git branch, called aaron . All his changes were made on this branch. While he was working, I continued to maintain the site as a whole, committing my changes to master . Eventually, Aaron merged his branch into master . This somehow reverted all of the commits I'd made to master between the time of the merge and the time when the aaron branch was first created. If I type git show <hash of merge commit> , I can see diffs for every file I changed while Aaron was working on