branch

记录git常用命令

…衆ロ難τιáo~ 提交于 2019-12-19 05:18:14
mkdir XX:创建一个空目录 XX指目录名 pwd:显示当前目录的路径 git init:吧当前的目录变成可以管理的git仓库,生成隐藏的.git文件 touch xx:新建xx文件文件 git add xx:把xx文件添加到暂存区 git commit -m “xx”a.txt :提交文件 -m后面的是注释 git status:查看仓库状态 git log:查看历史记录 git reset --hard HEAD^:网上回退一个版本 cat xx:查看xx文件内容 git reflog:查看历史记录的版本号id git checkout -- xx:把xx文件在工作区的修改全部撤销 git rm xx:删除xx文件 之后要commit chttps://github.com/qiuhaifeng01/a.git 关联一个远程库 git push -u(第一次要用-u以后不用)origin master:把当前master分支推送到远程库 git clone https://github.com/xxxxx 从远程库中克隆 git checkout -b dev:创建dev分支 并切换到dev分支上 git branch:查看当前所有的分支 git checkout master:切换回master分支 git merge dev:在当前分支合并dev分支 git

SourceSafe Merge at the project level

时间秒杀一切 提交于 2019-12-19 03:36:12
问题 I'm running SourceSafe and I have two branches of my code. I'm currently using the manual approach of running a report to show differences and then manually merging each file one by one. However I'm trying to find a streamlined way to do this on the project level. It's ok if the process shows me each file one at a time, I'm just worried if I go manually one by one to each file and merge each file separately that I'll accidentally skip a file. Whereas a "wizard" I could trust to hit every file

git在项目中的实际运用

大兔子大兔子 提交于 2019-12-19 03:05:28
git在项目中的实际运用 项目中只运用git版本管理的情况下: 1.创建分支命令: git branch (branchname) 切换分支命令: git checkout (branchname) 当你切换分支的时候,Git 会用该分支的最后提交的快照替换你的工作目录的内容, 所以多个分支不需要多个目录。 合并分支命令: git merge 2.列出分支 列出分支基本命令: git branch 没有参数时,git branch 会列出你在本地的分支。 $ git branch master 当你执行 git init 的时候,缺省情况下 Git 就会为你创建"master"分支。 如果我们要手动创建一个分支。执行 git branch (branchname) 即可。 $ git branch testing $ git branch master testing 3.删除分支 删除分支命令: git branch -d (branchname) 例如我们要删除"testing"分支: $ git branch master testing $ git branch -d testing Deleted branch testing (was 85fc7e7). $ git branch master 4.分支合并 一旦某分支有了独立内容,你终究会希望将它合并回到你的主分支。

SVN: Moving repository trunk to another's branch (with history)

自作多情 提交于 2019-12-18 20:49:42
问题 I'm working with an SVN setup with a lot of repositories. I'm trying to consolidate some by moving the trunk of one into the branch of another (the old ones are themed versions of the new one, minus some code fixes I'll be applying later, so it makes sense to me). Short version, I want to go from RepositoryA/trunk to RepositoryB/branches/RepAName. Ideally, I'd like to maintain the history. I could do an export -> import, but that loses the history and so it isn't ideal. I can't do a dump via

How to lock SVN trunk except for merges from branch?

情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2019-12-18 18:04:13
问题 I'd like to prevent developers working directly on the trunk. I'm aiming to enforce all developers off the trunk and to work on there own branches until CI tests are cleared. They then have to merge from the trunk to their branch (to pick up latest changes), run and pass tests before they merge back to the trunk. Is there any rules for this style of SVN usage? 回答1: Limit trunk commits to a bot. That bot can do the conflict-free merge and commit to trunk. I've done just that; it's called

How to Shrink/Cut a Git Repo

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-12-18 16:57:41
问题 We have a Git repo with 7 contributing developers with over 2.5 years of history and about 10,000 commits. We use Assembla to push and pull from. When we add new developers cloning the repo to their dev computers takes almost an hour. I'm not sure if this is the proper terminology, but our goal is to "shrink" the repo by "cutting/snipping" off the first 1.5 years worth of commits and keeping only the latest year of history. We want to keep a "backup" copy of the entire repo, whether as a

Practical way to commit changes in source control to multiple branches

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-12-18 16:17:09
问题 A common scenario when using source control is to have a development branch along with versioned release branches. We use CVS, with HEAD as the development branch, and a branch named e.g. release-6-2 for the current release of a product. Development of new features go into the development branch only, but bug fixes sometimes have to be checked into both the development branch and the current release branch. This can get quite tedious at times, so I am looking for practical ways to accomplish

How to make existing branch an orphan in git

亡梦爱人 提交于 2019-12-18 15:33:09
问题 Is there a way to make an existing branch an orphan in git? git checkout --orphan seems to only create a new orphan? 回答1: Do I understand you right, that you want the orphaned branch to already have a history of commits? If so, here's a solution. First you need to pick a commit to start the new branch at. In my example this will be HEAD~2 , sha1=df931da . Say, we've got a simple repo. git log --oneline --graph --decorate shows the following: * 4f14671 (HEAD, master) 4 * 1daf6ba 3 * df931da 2

如何删除未推送的git commit?

夙愿已清 提交于 2019-12-18 15:27:02
我不小心犯了错误的分支。 如何删除该提交? #1楼 删除最近的提交,并保留已完成的工作: git reset --soft HEAD~1 删除最近的提交, 破坏 您已完成的工作: git reset --hard HEAD~1 #2楼 进行 git rebase -i FAR_ENOUGH_BACK 并删除不需要的提交行。 #3楼 如果要将该提交移至另一个分支,请获取有问题的提交的SHA git rev-parse HEAD 然后切换当前分支 git checkout other-branch 然后 cherry-pick other-branch git cherry-pick <sha-of-the-commit> #4楼 不要删除它:仅执行一次 git cherry-pick 就足够了。 但是,如果您在错误的分支上进行了 几次 提交,那么 git rebase --onto : 假设您有: x--x--x--x <-- master \ -y--y--m--m <- y branch, with commits which should have been on master ,然后可以标记 master 并将其移动到您想要的位置: git checkout master git branch tmp git checkout y git branch -f master x

GIT: commit changes to old/safe branch while in new/dirty/dev branch without checking out or losing unstaged data

[亡魂溺海] 提交于 2019-12-18 15:13:08
问题 I created a new Branch before I started dev on something experimental. I usually forget that (which isn't a problem), but now I did it beforehand. Since then I have updated 3 files. In 2 are only experimental changes that I DON'T want committed to the safe branch. In 1 are only safe (minor) changes that I definitely DO want committed to the safe branch. I'm fine with these last changes to be committed to the new branch as well (but rather not). Is it possible - I'm sure it is - to (quickly)