batch-processing

I am trying to create a file and store in it the results from my query. I have a batch file that contains the single query, USE database1; SELECT * FROM table WHERE name = "abc" INTO OUTFILE output.txt; QUIT Executing this batch file using, mysql -u root -p -t -vvv < select.sql However, the result is not table formatted and fields' names are missing from the top. 100 abc Brown 32 101 abc Flair 25 102 abc McDonald 45 . . . If I remove the INTO OUTFILE statement and print the results on terminal, then is working OK. +----+------+---------+-----+ | id | name | surname | age | +----+------+-------

I have a long running Torque/PBS job and I'd like to monitor output. But log file only gets copied after the job is finished. Is there a way to convince PBS to refresh it? Unfortunately, AFAIK, that is not possible with PBS/Torque - the stdout/stderr streams are locally spooled on the execution host and then transferred to the submit host after the job has finished. You can redirect the standard output of the program to a file if you'd like to monitor it during the execution (it makes sense only if the execution and the sumit hosts share a common filesystem). I suspect the rationale is that it

I have created a batch file which automatically copy a .sql file to the path of installed Jasper server(it could be any software installation directory). This is my batch script-- C:\PROGRA~2\JASPER~1.0\mysql\bin\mysql.exe -u root -proot < create_database.sql that is working when jasper is installed in Program Files(x86). How can i generalize it for both Program Files and Program Files(x86). You want to use environment variables to look up things like this. On 32bit Windows, %ProgramFiles% is your friend. On 64bit Windows, things are a little more complicated, as application can be installed

Batch files return the error code of the last command by default. Is it somehow possible to return the error code of a former command. Most notably, is it possible to return the error code of a command in a pipe? For example, this one-line batch script foo.exe returns the error code of foo . But this one: foo.exe | tee output.txt always returns the exit code of tee , which is zero. I had a similar problem and settled on the following solution as I did not need to detect the exact error code just success or failure. echo > .failed.tmp ( foo.exe && del .failed.tmp ) | tee foo.log if exist

I want to write a batch script where the user can enter the line number and the script will delete that line of a text file. Eg: tmp.txt 1. aaa 2. bbb 3. ccc 4. ddd I want when i execute my script and user inputs 3, the tmp.txt to be 1. aaa 2. bbb 4. ddd I am trying something like this: @ECHO OFF SET /P LINENUMBER=Enter the Line No: FOR /F "tokens=1* delims=[]" %%a IN ('FIND /n /v "" ^< tmp.txt') DO ( IF %%a equ %LINENUMBER% ( ???????????????????? ) ) You cannot modify the file directly. You must create a new file with the desired content and then replace the original file with the new file.

I have a bunch of individual files that I want to each run through Avisynth. However, an AVS file can only create one video. As far as I know, there is no way to declare a variable's value from the command line. I know that you can probably create a script that generates a bunch of AVS files and then somehow convert each AVS file to a video. However, since Avisynth is a scripting system, this seems kind of complicated. There must be some way to run different videos through a script, right? What is the best way to do this? Thanks in advance. I've never found a way to pass a command line

Use case: Read 10 million rows [10 columns] from database and write to a file (csv format). Which ItemReader implementation among JdbcCursorItemReader & JdbcPagingItemReader would be suggested? What would be the reason? Which would be better performing (fast) in the above use case? Would the selection be different in case of a single-process vs multi-process approach? In case of a multi-threaded approach using TaskExecutor, which one would be better & simple? To process that kind of data, you're probably going to want to parallelize it if that is possible (the only thing preventing it would be

I'm using hibernate + play! framework at work, is there a "best practice" on inserting a good amount of records using hibernate? They are around 6,000 to 10,000 per text file so I don't know if Hibernate is going to choke on the job or throw an exception. Any suggestion let me know, let me know if I have to explain more From *Java Persistence and Hibernate" (Manning) and following a comment from Pangea, use a stateless session (which doesn't have a persistence context cache) : StatelessSession session = sessionFactory.openStatelessSession(); Transaction tx = session.beginTransaction(); for (