automapper

So, here's my situation. I've got a my two classes: class FromClass { public string[] Foo { get; set; } } class ToClass { public string[] Foo { get; set; } } The classes have properties which are arrays. They could be List<T> or IEnumerable<T> , I get the same result in any of those cases. I try to map from one to the other using the AutoMapper.QueryableExtensions : class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { // create a "From" object string[] anArray = new string[] { "a", "b" }; FromClass anObject = new FromClass() { Foo = anArray }; // make a queryable set that includes the "From"

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I'm trying to use Automapper to map from a regular enum to an Enumeration Class (as described by Jimmy Bogard - http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/12/enumeration-classes/ ). The regular enum doesn't have the same values as the enumeration class does. I would therefore like to map using the Name if possible: Enum: public enum ProductType { ProductType1, ProductType2 } Enumeration Class: public class ProductType : Enumeration { public static ProductType ProductType1 = new ProductType(8, "Product Type 1"); public static ProductType

I just started using the Entity Framework 1.0 recently and believe I am beginning to feel the pains everyone is talking about. I'm trying to use best practices so I have a set of DTO that get mapped to and from my Entities via AutoMapper. The real catch is when I'm trying to update an object. The first gotcha was that I could not find a way to create a new entity, transfer the data from my DTO, and still have the entity ObjectContext realize that it has been changed. I used the following code: public VideoDTO UpdateVideo(VideoDTO pVideo) { Video video = new Video(); Mapper.Map(pVideo, video);

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I need to map to a protected property on a class using Automapper . I've got a public method exposed on this class that is used to set values to the property. This method requires a parameter . How can I map a value to this class? Destination Class: public class Policy { private Billing _billing; protected Billing Billing { get { return _billing; } set { _billing = value; } } public void SetBilling(Billing billing) { if (billing != null) { Billing = billing; } else { throw new NullReferenceException("Billing can't be null"); } } } Here's

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I'm using automapper and I would like to know if it's possible to ignore a mapping of a field when that's null. That's my code: .ForMember(dest => dest.BusinessGroup_Id, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => (int)src.BusinessGroup)) src.BusinessGroup type = "enum" dest.BusinessGroup_Id = int The objective it's to ingore that Mapping if src.BusinessGroup = null. 回答1: I think NullSubstitute option will do the trick .ForMember(d => d.BusinessGroup_Id, o => o.MapFrom(s => (int?)s.BusinessGroup)); .ForMember(d => d.BusinessGroup_Id, o => o.NullSubstitute(0))

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: Using Automapper 3.3.1.0 there is a different mapping behavior between the usage of Mapper.Map<IEnumerable<TDestination>>(someEnumerable) compared to someEnumerable.AsQueryable().Project().To<TDestination>() This does not appear to be a limitation of a SQL LINQ provider or other as this is witnessed in an in-memory collection. As with many things this is best explained by example: Note: the following code can be found at https://gist.github.com/kmoormann/b3949d006f4083ab6ee4 using System . Collections . Generic ; using System .