authorization

Deny access to folder but allow access to a file inside that folder

我的梦境 提交于 2019-12-11 06:37:53
问题 I would like to deny anonymous users access to the folder 'test' but exclude and allow access to a file 'webform1' inside the test folder. Why does this not work? <location path="test"> <system.web> <authorization> <deny users="?"/> </authorization> </system.web> </location> <location path="test/webform1"> <system.web> <authorization> <allow users="*"/> </authorization> </system.web> Here is a link to a sample webforms project https://github.com/uselesshasid/StackOverflow_Question_38597397

How to authenticate with Google Drive in asp.net without copy/pasting auth tokens

一曲冷凌霜 提交于 2019-12-11 06:32:25
问题 I'm trying to get authorization code for Google Drive in my ASP program. I wrote some code like quickstart program from sample of Google API for .NET: private static IAuthorizationState GetAuthorization(NativeApplicationClient arg){ // Get the auth URL: IAuthorizationState state = new AuthorizationState( new[] {DriveService.Scopes.Drive.GetStringValue() }); state.Callback = new Uri(NativeApplicationClient.OutOfBandCallbackUrl); Uri authUri = arg.RequestUserAuthorization(state); //Request

What is the purpose of Resource Owner Password Credential Grant Type in OAuth 2.0?

江枫思渺然 提交于 2019-12-11 06:28:35
问题 Based on the answer to my previous question Ok, OAuth 2.0 is an authorization protocol but when you use ROPC (Resource Owner Password Credential) Grant Type, the way I understand it, you mean to authenticate and authorize isn't it? Is OpenID still applicable in ROPC? still a little bit confuse with OAuth 2.0 ROPC and OpenID 回答1: The Resource Owner Password Credentials grant type does authenticate users but is a non-typical OAuth 2.0 grant type that is only meant for migration purposes, as the

Populate custom claim from SQL with Windows Authenticated app in .Net Core

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-12-11 06:12:58
问题 Scenario - .Net Core Intranet Application within Active Directory using SQL Server to manage application specific permissions and extended user identity. Success to date - User is authenticated and windows claims are available (Name and Groups). Identity.Name can be used to return a domain user model from the database with the extended properties. Issue and Question - I am trying to then populate one custom claim property "Id" and have that globally available via the ClaimsPrincipal. I have

Unauthorized request does not redirect to login page with returnUrl query string parameter

醉酒当歌 提交于 2019-12-11 05:59:38
问题 Setup In my MVC3 app, MembersController is decorated with an [Authorize] attribute. MembersController has an Action called MyPage. Due to the Authorize attribute on the controller, MyPage can only be requested by authorized users. Problem When an unauthorized user tries to request /Members/MyPage they are correctly redirected to the Login page. However, the ReturnUrl parameter is not passed into the login page, so when the user authenticates, they are taken to the default page (lets call it

How can a user with same role access different posts with different permissions?

本秂侑毒 提交于 2019-12-11 05:48:06
问题 I use devise for authentication and have assigned a role for each user. I have one more model posts which contain number of posts. I want to restrict one user of the role employee to view the specific post and the same user to view and create the different post. How can I do this? 回答1: I realize I am late to the battle here. What you are looking for is an extension to role-based access control. RBAC cannot cater well for your scenario. You need to consider attribute-based access control.

Railscast authorization from scratch for users

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-12-11 05:38:31
问题 So this is the authorization code I wrote based on Railscast #386. The problem is that the block works on all controllers except for user_controller . In other words, any user can triger edit and update actions on any other user, even though the block given to it is the same as that of favors edit and update actions. def initialize(user) allow :users, [:new, :create, :show] allow :sessions, [:new, :create, :destroy] allow :favors, [:index, :show] if user allow :users, [:edit, :update] do |usr

Rails 5 compatibility between Paranoia and CanCanCan, compromised?

十年热恋 提交于 2019-12-11 05:05:16
问题 I'm having the exact same issue as described on this thread: Rails 5 only_deleted with cancancan #356 I can access a deleted record, like this: @area = Area.only_deleted.find(params[:id]) but if I add load_and_authorize_resource to my controller, it'll attempt to run the query like this: @area = Area.find(params[:id]) which will result in error since it won't find a record with that id on a collection where deleted_at isn't null (not deleted records, the purpose of the Paranoia gem). If I

Best free way to use AOP style MVC-like authorization in business logic

荒凉一梦 提交于 2019-12-11 04:44:01
问题 I like the authorization attribute in ASP.NET MVC. Not so much the attribute itself, but the way you apply it. I want to use it in my non-ASP MVC services layer preferably in my plain C# business logic library or at least but less preferably at the endpoints of my WCF service endpoints. Is PostSharp my only answer or is there a free similar solution? 回答1: I am in a similar situation and have recently researched quite a few options. There are a few open source projects for AOP with .NET but

Docebo - constructing authorisation header

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-12-11 04:15:14
问题 I have been trying to construct authorisation header for Docebo but I am unable to get it working as the documentation is not descriptive enough and their code sample (only code sample) is very confusing. This is basically all Docebo documentation: What I am trying to do is to get a list of all users. public JsonResult GetCoursesCount() { const string apiKey = "[API KEY FROM MY DOCEBO PORTAL]"; const string apiSecret = "[API SECRET FROM MY DOCEBO PORTAL]"; const string doceboUrl = "[URL OF MY