acl

问题 I am currently using the mosquitto broker to see if I can build something interesting with it and I came across this plugin for authentication called mosquitto-auth-plugin. I followed the documentation of the plugin and I am using postgres as the back-end table. It seems to be working with respect to user authentication. When it comes to ACL I find the publish ACL is on spot but the subscription ACL is something I am not able to wrap my mind around. |-- GETTING USERS: karthik 1546887525: |--

问题 I have an S3 bucket which is used as Access logging bucket. Here is my current module and resource TF code for that: module "access_logging_bucket" { source = "../../resources/s3_bucket" environment = "${var.environment}" region = "${var.region}" acl = "log-delivery-write" encryption_key_alias = "alias/ab-data-key" name = "access-logging" name_tag = "Access logging bucket" } resource "aws_s3_bucket" "default" { bucket = "ab-${var.environment}-${var.name}-${random_id.bucket_suffix.hex}" acl =

问题 I have an S3 bucket which is used as Access logging bucket. Here is my current module and resource TF code for that: module "access_logging_bucket" { source = "../../resources/s3_bucket" environment = "${var.environment}" region = "${var.region}" acl = "log-delivery-write" encryption_key_alias = "alias/ab-data-key" name = "access-logging" name_tag = "Access logging bucket" } resource "aws_s3_bucket" "default" { bucket = "ab-${var.environment}-${var.name}-${random_id.bucket_suffix.hex}" acl =

问题 I use getfacl -RP ../www > permission_backup to store the permission and Beyond Compare to compare two permission_backup ,if permission has any change,I will run setfacl --restore . I found a problem,I run getfacl -RP ../www > permission_backup to the same folder twice,items in permission_backup may have different order,then Beyond Compare will tell me there's big different. For example: One permission_backup is as below: # file: ../www/info/2013-09-05/16.html # owner: apache # group: apache

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28860107/is-this-a-good-strategy-for-implementing-access-control

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28860107/is-this-a-good-strategy-for-implementing-access-control

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6942747/can-powershell-trap-errors-in-getchilditem-and-continue-looping

问题 My aim is to be able to call the Google Storage REST APIs with an OAuth token granting an authenticated Google user the read/write permissions on a directory called "directoryName" inside my storage bucket. So, far I have successfully managed to use the Storage APIs after adding the user to the ACL for the bucket. However, I do not want to grant the user the READ or WRITE permissions on the complete bucket but just on the user's directory inside the bucket e.g. bucket/directoryName. e.g. I

问题 I'm trying to move data from a datalake stored in Azure Data Lake Storage Gen1 to a table in an Azure SQL database. In Data Factory "new Linked Service" when I test the connection I get a "connection failed" error message, "Access denied...make sure ACL and firewall rule is correctly configured in the Azure Data Lake Store account. I tried numerous times to correct using related Stack overflow comments and plethora of fragmented Azure documentation to no avail. Am I using the correct approach

问题 I'm trying to use the npm module Acl to implement an ACL system. The homepage can be found here: https://github.com/OptimalBits/node_acl. The documentation shows a lot of very simple examples for giving a role access. In particular, there is a good piece of code here: acl.allow([ { roles:['guest','member'], allows:[ {resources:'blogs', permissions:'get'}, {resources:['forums','news'], permissions:['get','put','delete']} ] }, { roles:['gold','silver'], allows:[ {resources:'cash', permissions:[