C: put x86 instructions into array and execute them [duplicate]

问题

Is there any way to put processor instructions into array, make its memory segment executable and run it as a simple function:

int main()
{
    char myarr[13] = {0x90, 0xc3};
    (void (*)()) myfunc = (void (*)()) myarr;
    myfunc();
    return 0;
}

回答1:

On Unix (these days, that means "everything except Windows and some embedded and mainframe stuff you've probably never heard of") you do this by allocating a whole number of pages with mmap, writing the code into them, and then making them executable with mprotect.

void execute_generated_machine_code(const uint8_t *code, size_t codelen)
{
    // in order to manipulate memory protection, we must work with
    // whole pages allocated directly from the operating system.
    static size_t pagesize;
    if (!pagesize) {
        pagesize = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
        if (pagesize == (size_t)-1) fatal_perror("getpagesize");
    }

    // allocate at least enough space for the code + 1 byte
    // (so that there will be at least one INT3 - see below),
    // rounded up to a multiple of the system page size.
    size_t rounded_codesize = ((codelen + 1 + pagesize - 1)
                               / pagesize) * pagesize;

    void *executable_area = mmap(0, rounded_codesize,
                                 PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
                                 MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
                                 -1, 0);
    if (!executable_area) fatal_perror("mmap");

    // at this point, executable_area points to memory that is writable but
    // *not* executable.  load the code into it.
    memcpy(executable_area, code, codelen);

    // fill the space at the end with INT3 instructions, to guarantee
    // a prompt crash if the generated code runs off the end.
    // must change this if generating code for non-x86.
    memset(executable_area + codelen, 0xCC, rounded_codesize - codelen);

    // make executable_area actually executable (and unwritable)
    if (mprotect(executable_area, rounded_codesize, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC))
        fatal_perror("mprotect");

    // now we can call it. passing arguments / receiving return values
    // is left as an exercise (consult libffi source code for clues).
    ((void (*)(void)) executable_area)();

    munmap(executable_area, rounded_codesize);
}

You can probably see that this code is very nearly the same as the Windows code shown in cherrydt's answer. Only the names and arguments of the system calls are different.

When working with code like this, it is important to know that many modern operating systems will not allow you to have a page of RAM that is simultaneously writable and executable. If I'd written PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC in the call to mmap or mprotect, it would fail. This is called the W^X policy; the acronym stands for Write XOR eXecute. It originates with OpenBSD, and the idea is to make it harder for a buffer-overflow exploit to write code into RAM and then execute it. (It's still possible, the exploit just has to find a way to make an appropriate call to mprotect first.)

回答2:

Depends on the platform.

For Windows, you can use this code:

// Allocate some memory as readable+writable
// TODO: Check return value for error
LPVOID memPtr = VirtualAlloc(NULL, sizeof(myarr), MEM_COMMIT, PAGE_READWRITE);

// Copy data
memcpy(memPtr, myarr, sizeof(myarr);

// Change memory protection to readable+executable
// Again, TODO: Error checking
DWORD oldProtection; // Not used but required for the function
VirtualProtect(memPtr, sizeof(myarr), PAGE_EXECUTE_READ, &oldProtection);    

// Assign and call the function
(void (*)()) myfunc = (void (*)()) memPtr;
myfunc();

// Free the memory
VirtualFree(memPtr, 0, MEM_RELEASE);

This codes assumes a myarr array as in your question's code, and it assumes that sizeof will work on it i.e. it has a directly defined size and is not just a pointer passed from elsewhere. If the latter is the case, you would have to specify the size in another way.

Note that here there are two "simplifications" possible, in case you wonder, but I would advise against them:

1) You could call VirtualAlloc with PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, but this is in general bad practice because it would open an attack vector for unwanted code exeuction.

2) You could call VirtualProtect on &myarr directly, but this would just make a random page in your memory which happens to contain your array executable, which is even worse then #1 because there might be other data in this page as well which is now suddenly executable as well.

For Linux, I found this on Google but I don't know much about it.

回答3:

Very OS-dependent: not all OSes will deliberately (read: without a bug) allow you to execute code in the data segment. DOS will because it runs in Real Mode, Linux can also with the appropriate privileges. I don't know about Windows.

Casting is often undefined and has its own caveats, so some elaboration on that topic here. From C11 standard draft N1570, §J.5.7/1:

A pointer to an object or to void may be cast to a pointer to a function, allowing data to be invoked as a function (6.5.4).

_{(Formatting added.)}

So, it's perfectly fine and should work as expected. Of course, you would need to cohere to the ABI's calling convention.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37122186/c-put-x86-instructions-into-array-and-execute-them

标签

memory

x86

execute