Can't quick sort become stable sort?

问题

Approach 1

C.A.R Hoare introduced partitioning logic(shown below), which is taught in school,

low = pivot = 0;
i = 1;
j = high = listSize-1;

while (true) {
    while (a[i] <= a[pivot] && (i < high)) {
        i = i + 1;
    }
    while (a[j] >= a[pivot] && (j > low)) {
        j = j - 1; 
    }

    if (i >= j)
        break;
    swap(a[i], a[j])
}

swap(a[j], a[pivot]); // pivot element is positioned(once)
return j;

---

Approach 2

To basically try make it stable sort, Instead j pointing to last index(listSize-1), if j points to listSize/2(i.e., mid), then,

we get into scenario where j > high or i >= mid, where a[i] do not have corresponding a[j] to swap with and vice-versa. In such scenario, swapping a[i] with a[pivot] also does not make sense, which looks an incorrect approach, To confirm the same,

---

My question:

With approach 2,

By maintaining the essence of quick sort, Can't we partition with pivot element(at any index)?

Note: Analyzing quick sort, not a home work

回答1:

This looks like home work, so I am not going to solve it completely:

• quick-sort can be made stable by ensuring that no 2 elements compare equal.

• choosing a different pivot alone does not provide a solution for this.

Since you say this is not homework, here is how to make quick-sort stable:

• make an array of pointers to the original array.

• use quick-sort to sort this array with a function that compares the pointed values this way:

  int sortptr(const void *a, const void *b) {
      const my_type * const *pa = a;
      const my_type * const *pb = b;
      int cmp = original_compare_function(*pa, *pb);
      return cmp ? cmp : (pa > pb) - (pa < pb);
  }
  

• copy the sorted items into a sorted array.

Note that this approach can be made to work in place, but it is tricky to do so and would still require allocating the array of pointers. merge-sort is much more reliable for stable sorting, but requires working space of approximately half the size of the original array.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41715443/cant-quick-sort-become-stable-sort