问题
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
class Task implements Callable<String> {
public String call() throws Exception {
String s = "initial";
try {
System.out.println("Started..");
/*for (int i=0;i<10000;i++) {
if (i % 2 == 0) {
System.out.println("Even");
}
}*/
boolean flag = true;
while(flag) {
}
System.out.println("Finished!");
s = "Done";
}
catch (RuntimeException e) {
s = "RuntimeException";
}
catch (Exception e) {
s = "Exception";
}
finally {
}
return s;
}
}
public class ExecutorServiceTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
List<Future<String>> result = executor.invokeAll(Arrays.asList(new Task()), 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
executor.shutdown();
Iterator<Future<String>> iter = result.iterator();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
System.out.println("Came here");
Future<String> fut = iter.next();
System.out.println(fut.get());
}
}
}
Is there a way in which i can stop the thread executing the infinite loop?
回答1:
Yes, you can replace flag
(or logically &&
) with !Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()
.
This way, when the task is canceled, the loop will be terminated.
The loop would look something like this:
while(!Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted() && flag) {
/* Do work. */
}
Use should be something like this:
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
Future<String> task = executor.submit(new Task());
String str;
try {
str = task.get(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
} finally {
task.cancel(true);
}
回答2:
Think about using synchronized (this) { this.wait() }
instead of sleep
inside call()
, and then when you set the boolean flag
externally (perhaps directly or via a flag()
method; with direct access make sure your flag variable is volatile
) call task.notifyAll()
to wake up the sleeping thread (make sure your task object is a local variable instead of having it anonymous so that you can call methods on it, and make flag a class attribute within Task
).
It'll also be more efficient like that because loops waste cycles needlessly -- the exact mechanism is called a 'guarded block' (http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/concurrency/guardmeth.html). When you wake up out of the wait, test for the flag variable just to make sure it was set.
Edit: looked at the original question more closely and created an example using the existing code and principles (there's more than one way to skin a cat :)). Try this -- the loop here exits due to the interrupted status of the current thread, which has been canceled due to timeout:
package ett;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.CancellationException;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
class Task implements Callable<String> {
public String call() throws Exception {
String s = "initial";
System.out.println("Started..");
for (int i=0;;i++) {
if (i % 2 == 0) {
System.out.println("Even");
}
Thread.yield();
if (Thread.interrupted()) break;
}
System.out.println("Finished!");
s = "Done";
return s;
}
}
public class ExecutorServiceTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
List<Future<String>> result = executor.invokeAll(Arrays.asList(new Task()), 1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
executor.shutdown();
System.out.println("came here");
for (Future<String> f : result) {
try {
System.out.println(f.get());
} catch (CancellationException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2358139/stop-an-infinite-loop-in-an-executorservice-task