Handling error checking with assert

问题

I've looked all over and it seems that there are a lot of mixed views on assert. For example, if I'm malloc'ing a pointer and want to make sure it's been allocated correctly I'd write:

p = malloc(sizeof(int));
assert(p)

instead of:

p = malloc(sizeof(int));
if (p == NULL)
{
... send error message
}

I know that with assert it will end the program, but for testing purposes — what I want to know is what the absolute safest way of:

testing for things like a malloc being done correctly.
dealing with an error if something isn't malloc'd correctly.

回答1:

TESTING FOR THE FAILURE:
The malloc function is REQUIRED by the C standard to return NULL if the requested amount of memory cannot be given to the program.
That means that if the return value of malloc is non-NULL, you can be sure that ALL of the memory was properly allocated.

Checking for a NULL return value is the ONLY way to determine whether or not malloc was successful. The assert function can be used to stop the program if an assertion fails, but in a production release of the program, there must be other error handling.
HANDLING THE FAILURE:
If the return value is NULL, use the errno variable to determine WHY the failure occurred. The errno variable is also part of the C standard.
For LINUX, here is the list of values errno can be set to:

http://www-numi.fnal.gov/offline_software/srt_public_context/WebDocs/Errors/unix_system_errors.html
IMPORTANT: A malloc failure is a serious error. If this happens in the program execution, don't try to continue to execute additional functionality in the program. Stop (exit from) the program as soon as an error has been logged and reported to the user of the program, as follows:

You should use the exit function with a non-zero return value to notify the user of the program that the program exited with an error status. The exit function is ALSO part of the C language standard.

Also, before you exit the program, make sure all other memory that was allocated (prior to the malloc failure) is properly de-allocated.

回答2:

Recall assert() is normally only active in debug build of programs and not release versions.

Classify the potential errors into groups:

1) Run-time errors that must be handled.
assert() is no good here, instead code must handle the error.

2) Run-time errors that should be handled yet have no defined remedy.
assert() is not wise here either. Code should signal (leave error message) and exit.

3) Run-time errors with no simply re-course to handle them.
assert() could be used here. Now when the program faults/dies/hangs we are left with nothing. Recommend code should signal like in #2 if at all possible.

4) Compile time errors.
assert(sizeof(int)*CHAR_BIT >= 32) is a good example usage. It is reasonable to assume that a build will occur in debug mode. Even this carries a risk with deployed source code that a user in the field may skip the debug build, so suggest only use assert() for internal code.

assert() is a tool in the C toolbox. It has its uses - and mis-uses.

With malloc(), I have worked on many projects that barred direct use of C lib malloc() and instead used a project specific code like my_malloc_never_fail() and my_malloc_may_fail() which had error handling and metrics. As @Weather Vane commented, good error handle is challenging.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34486414/handling-error-checking-with-assert

标签

malloc

assert