How can I avoid multiple nested subscriptions using RxJS operators?

风格不统一 提交于 2019-12-10 17:47:13

问题


I am working on a file encryption and upload class using Angular. Many of these operations are async and therefore the methods I wrote are returning RxJS Observables.

// 1.
private prepareUpload(file): Observable<T>;

// 2.
private encryptData(data, filekey): Observable<T>

// 3.
private uploadEncryptedData(formData, token, range): Observable<T>

// 4.
private completeUpload(updatedFilekey, token): Observable<T>

I want to encapsulate this logic in a public upload(file) method and I ended up using nested subscriptions and it works but I know that it is wrong and an anti-pattern in RxJS for several reasons. Here is a simplified version of the code:

public upload(file) {
    const gen = this.indexGenerator(); // generator function

    this.prepareUpload(file).subscribe(values => {
    const [response, filekey, data] = values;

    this.encryptData(data, filekey).subscribe(encryptedDataContainer => {
      const formData = this.prepareEncDataUpload(encryptedDataContainer.data, file.name)
      const range = this.getRange(file.size, gen.next().value);

      this.uploadEncryptedData(formData, response.token, range).subscribe(() => {
        if (range.isFinalPart) {
            this.completeUpload(encryptedDataContainer.updatedFilekey, response.token).subscribe(console.log);
        }
      });

    });

  });

}

I failed to clean this code using combinations of several RxJS operators. My goal is to avoid nested subscriptions and instead return a single Observable from the public upload() method when the workflow is completed.

Thanks!


回答1:


You can use mergeMap and filter operators from RxJs and chain your calls. You will need to create some function level variables to use during the chaining.

import { mergeMap, filter, catchError } from 'rxjs/operators`
public upload(file) {
    const gen = this.indexGenerator(); // generator function
    let range, token;
    this.prepareUpload(file)
      .pipe(
        mergeMap((values) => {
          const [response, filekey, data] = values;
          token = response.token;
          return this.encryptData(data, filekey);
        }),
        mergeMap(encryptedDataContainer => {
          const formData = this.prepareEncDataUpload(encryptedDataContainer.data, file.name)
          range = this.getRange(file.size, gen.next().value);

          return this.uploadEncryptedData(formData, token, range);
        }),
        filter(() => !!range.isFinalPart),
        mergeMap(() => {
          return this.completeUpload(encryptedDataContainer.updatedFilekey, token);
        })
        catchError((error) => {
          console.log(error);
          // handle the error accordingly.
        })
      )
      .subscribe(() => {
        console.log('success');
      });

  }



回答2:


You want to use pipe before subscribing. Pipe allows you to make changes to values coming down the stream before the stream emits them. Also, use mergeMap to flatten the subscribe chain. Here's an overview. This doesn't provide a full solution - not paying me enough ;) - but is sufficient to point you in the right direction:

this.prepareUpload(file).pipe(
  tap(values => console.log('hello1', values)),
  map(values => [response, filekey, data]),
  tap(values => console.log('hello2', values)),
  mergeMap(() =>
      // essential to catchError else an HTTP error response will disable this effect - if it uses HTTP - catchError essentially prevents the stream from erroring in which case it will never emit again
      this.encryptData(data, filekey).pipe(
        map(res => res), // do something with res here if you want
        catchError(() => {
          return of(null)
        })
      )
    ),
    filter(res => !!res)
    // more mergemap stuff here
  ).subscribe(values => {
    console.log(values)
  })

Hint: use the tap operator to console.log values as they are passing down the stream

PS: Syntax not checked, may be missing a comma or bracket or 2

PPS: the functions in the pipe are all RxJS operators




回答3:


You can merge those observables using mergeMap rxjs operator and get rid of nested subscriptions.

Though there is one catch, Be aware that because mergeMap maintains multiple active inner subscriptions at once it's possible to create a memory leak through long-lived inner subscriptions.

For reference and example: https://www.learnrxjs.io/operators/transformation/mergemap.html




回答4:


I think chaining your observables would do it, you can do it with flatMap (alias for mergeMap) maybe - https://stackoverflow.com/a/37777382/9176461 and RxJS Promise Composition (passing data)

As in my comment mentoined, something like the following should work (pseudo code):

public upload(file) {
    const gen = this.indexGenerator(); // generator function

    return Rx.Observable.just(file).pipe(
         mergeMap(this.prepareUpload),
         mergeMap(this.encryptData),
         mergeMap(this.prepareEncDataUpload),
         mergeMap(this.prepareEncDataUpload),
         .... )
}


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55416011/how-can-i-avoid-multiple-nested-subscriptions-using-rxjs-operators

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!