virtual

C++ Parent class calling a child virtual function

爱⌒轻易说出口 提交于 2019-12-03 11:20:26
I want a pure virtual parent class to call a child implementation of a function like so: class parent { public: void Read() { //read stuff } virtual void Process() = 0; parent() { Read(); Process(); } } class child : public parent { public: virtual void Process() { //process stuff } child() : parent() { } } int main() { child c; } This should work, but I get an unlinked error :/ This is using VC++ 2k3 Or shouldn't it work, am I wrong? Title of the following article says it all: Never Call Virtual Functions during Construction or Destruction . Alternatively, make a factory method for creating

Covariant virtual functions return type problem

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 08:57:35
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have following code: #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Child1 { int i; }; class Child2 : public Child1 { int j; }; class Base1 { public: virtual Child1& getChildren() { cout << "Children1" << endl; return children; } private: Child1 children; }; class Base2 : public Base1 { public: virtual Child2& getChildren() { cout << "Children2" << endl; return children; } private: Child2 children; }; This code compiles fine but when I change the return type of getChildren() from reference type to object type in either or both Base1 and

How do I save space with inverted page tables?

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 08:52:47
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: Why do we save memory if we use inverted page tables to map virtual addresses to physical ones? If we have for example two processes which both have 4 pages we would have 8 entries in two different tables pointing from virtual to physical address: Process 1 : [ 0 ] = 1 [ 1 ] = 5 [ 2 ] = 63 [ 3 ] = 0 Process 2 : [ 20 ] = 14 [ 21 ] = 55 [ 22 ] = 11 [ 25 ] = 9 If we would use inverted page tables we would only have one big table pointing it the other way around. But in size they equal. 2 ) Inverted page table [ 0 ] = < p1 | 3 > [ 1 ]

Mongoosejs virtual populate

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 08:48:34
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have a circle model in my project: var circleSchema = new Schema({ //circleId: {type: String, unique: true, required: true}, patientID: {type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "patient"}, circleName: String, caregivers: [{type: Schema.Types.ObjectId}], accessLevel: Schema.Types.Mixed }); circleSchema.virtual('caregiver_details',{ ref: 'caregiver', localField: 'caregivers', foreignField: 'userId' }); caregiver schema: var cargiverSchema = new Schema({ userId: {type: Schema.ObjectId, unique: true}, //objectId of user document detailId: {type:

NHibernate property formula filter

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 08:46:08
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have a following class: MyClass public virtual int Id { get; set; } public virtual int Code { get; set; } public virtual int Description { get; set; } public virtual int Name { get; set; } with the following mapping: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2" namespace="TestApplication" assembly="TestApplication"> <class name="MyClass" table="MyTable"> <id name="Id" column="id"> <generator class="native"/> </id> <property name="Code" column="code"/> <property name="Description" column=

Why does Windows reserve 1Gb (or 2 Gb) for its system address space?

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-12-03 08:40:36
问题 It's a known fact that Windows applications usually have 2Gb of private address space on a 32bit system. This space can be extended to 3Gb with the /3Gb switch. The operating system reserves itself the remaining of the 4Gb. My question is WHY? Code running in kernel mode (i.e. device driver code) has its own address space. Why, on top of a exclusive 4Gb address space, the operating system still want to reserve 2Gb of each user-mode process? I thought the reason is the transition between user

cannot open manage.py after installing django

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-12-03 08:16:39
I have a problem in setting up django. My situation: I have Anaconda Python 2.7 in my Windows 8 computer. On the Anaconda command prompt window, I type: pip install django . This is successful. Then I create a folder named "newproject". On the command prompt I went to the folder "newproject". Then django-admin.py startproject newproject . This is successful. Then I run python manage.py runserver . It tells me "...can't open file 'manage.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory" I checked out udemy django installation guide and other guides on the net. I have even set up a virtual environment.

How to run the Microsoft Windows XP VHD, for testing with IE 6.0, with a valid/un-expired date?

懵懂的女人 提交于 2019-12-03 07:15:11
问题 I just downloaded the VHD for windows xp: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=11575 But when I start the virtual pc it says that "the evaluation period for this copy of windows has ended..." I read that for the Windows XP image: "Expires: This image will shutdown and become completely unusable on August 09, 2011." Why is it expired? where could I download a working version? Thanks 回答1: Note 1 : I'm running the XP IE6 VHD which expires today, 4/4/12 (this VHD

virtual function that is const in the base class and not const in the derived

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-12-03 06:58:18
Can anyone explain the output of the following code? #include <iostream> #include <string> class Animal { public: Animal(const std::string & name) : _name(name) { } ~Animal() { } virtual void printMessage() const { std::cout << "Hello, I'm " << _name << std::endl; } private: std::string _name; // other operators and stuff }; class Cow : public Animal { public: Cow(const std::string & name) : Animal(name) { } ~Cow() { } virtual void printMessage() { Animal::printMessage(); std::cout << "and moo " << std::endl; } }; int main() { Cow cow("bill"); Animal * animal = &cow; cow.printMessage(); animal

How to ensure that virtual method calls get propagated all the way to the base class?

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-12-03 06:52:04
问题 One very common mistake with class hierarchies is to specify a method in a base class as being virtual, in order for all overrides in the inheritance chain to do some work, and forgetting to propagate the call on to base implementations. Example scenario class Container { public: virtual void PrepareForInsertion(ObjectToInsert* pObject) { // Nothing to do here } }; class SpecializedContainer : public Container { protected: virtual void PrepareForInsertion(ObjectToInsert* pObject) { // Set