version-control

问题 Okay, so we have a rather large solution with about 8 different projects inside it. Each of these projects depend on various different 3rd party assemblies. This solution is in the trunk branch of source control. We also have about 5 different branches off of trunk. What is the best way to manage these 3rd party assemblies? When you add a reference to an assembly and then click it and view the properties window I notice that it has a hard coded path to the assembly. For example: All our

问题 I have several feature branches and a master branch. Feature2 is done. Normally I would rebase (working with a remote SVN repo and would like to keep the history, so no regular merge) and ff-merge. But since master hasnt changed since I branched, I would like to move the master head (at E ) to G . Using git branch -f master G does not result in any visible changes, I assumed this is because G is on a different branch. Is it safe to use git update-ref -f master G here instead? Should I stick

问题 If you ever edited a question right here on StackOverflow, you have probably noticed that it keeps track of what exact changed were applied to a question. It is displayed in a form by highlighting red portion of a text which were removed and green which were added since at a particular edit. My question is how to implement such a system myself. I am trying to make a custom CMS in PHP with MySQL and this seems like a very cool feature to tackle. Any advice or maybe there are open source

问题 When developing an application with lots of stored procedures, should you store them in some sort of source versioning system (such as source-safe, TFS, SVN)? If so, why? And is there a convenient front end way to do this with SQL Server Management Studio? 回答1: Yes. All code should be stored in source control. Simply put, code is code and mistakes happen. It's nice to be able to go back and see what changed over time and be able to go back to those changes. We have to add it manually to a

问题 When developing an application with lots of stored procedures, should you store them in some sort of source versioning system (such as source-safe, TFS, SVN)? If so, why? And is there a convenient front end way to do this with SQL Server Management Studio? 回答1: Yes. All code should be stored in source control. Simply put, code is code and mistakes happen. It's nice to be able to go back and see what changed over time and be able to go back to those changes. We have to add it manually to a

问题 I'm a VSS user learning how to use SVN, and I have selected TortoiseSVN as my platform. Can someone tell me what the term "HEAD Revision" means? 回答1: It means the Latest Revision. Getting the HEAD Revision from SVN would be like doing a 'Get Latest...' in VSS. 回答2: Since your question is Subversion-specific, here is what the SVN book says: HEAD The latest (or “youngest”) revision in the repository. For comparison, here are the other revision keywords: BASE The revision number of an item in a

问题 This question has likely been asked before but I'm having a heck of a time searching for it. Very frequently, experienced git users will say "do not rebase repositories that have already been exposed publicly!" and rightly so. But I don't see any information that deals with the fallout. I know it's a situation we're not supposed to get ourselves into, but what do we do when it does happen? Original: A--B--C--D--E--F My Repo: A--B--C--D \ X--Y--Z Rebased: A--B \ L--M--N--O So I fetch , that

问题 This question has likely been asked before but I'm having a heck of a time searching for it. Very frequently, experienced git users will say "do not rebase repositories that have already been exposed publicly!" and rightly so. But I don't see any information that deals with the fallout. I know it's a situation we're not supposed to get ourselves into, but what do we do when it does happen? Original: A--B--C--D--E--F My Repo: A--B--C--D \ X--Y--Z Rebased: A--B \ L--M--N--O So I fetch , that

问题 What's the right way, to handle versioning indicators like 2.4 or 2.4.0.9 etc. to get the ability of sorting versions. PHP says, that 1.3.4 is not a valid integer, but also a non-valid number. array('2.4','2.3.4','2.4.0.9') 回答1: PHP has a version_compare function. Use usort to sort it. Like following. :) $a = array('2.4','2.3.4','2.4.0.9'); usort($a, 'version_compare'); 回答2: Or, just use natsort: $array = array('2.4','2.16.6','2.3.4','2.4.0.9'); natsort($array); print_r($array); #Array ( [2]

问题 What's the right way, to handle versioning indicators like 2.4 or 2.4.0.9 etc. to get the ability of sorting versions. PHP says, that 1.3.4 is not a valid integer, but also a non-valid number. array('2.4','2.3.4','2.4.0.9') 回答1: PHP has a version_compare function. Use usort to sort it. Like following. :) $a = array('2.4','2.3.4','2.4.0.9'); usort($a, 'version_compare'); 回答2: Or, just use natsort: $array = array('2.4','2.16.6','2.3.4','2.4.0.9'); natsort($array); print_r($array); #Array ( [2]