version-control

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10414814/tortoisesvn-reports-conflict-but-no-conflict-can-be-found

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49801574/perforce-claims-file-is-different-when-its-not

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32401445/git-ignore-file-without-deleting-it

问题 What is the difference between Rollback and "Get This Version" ? Both of them let me go back to a specific version and from there doing changes and check-in. What are the additional benefits of having both of them? 回答1: Get specific version / Get this version Only effects your local workspace, it reverts all your local changes to an older version. When you try to check these changes in, you'll get a merge conflict and will need to resolve these issues. It's useful when you need to debug an

问题 I have been tasked with finding out if our current Linux SVN Server can be migrated to MS Windows. I have located and trialed a program called VisualSVN Server and it seems to do everything that we need, but I am clueless as to if it is possible to convert the current Linux repos to run on a Windows Server box. I am new to the whole SVN application so please treat me gently with your answers :) Thanks, C. 回答1: I have personnally successfully used repositories created in Linux on the Windows

问题 In the Pro Git book, it says “origin” is not special Just like the branch name “master” does not have any special meaning in Git, neither does “origin”. While “master” is the default name for a starting branch when you run git init which is the only reason it’s widely used , “origin” is the default name for a remote when you run git clone. If you run git clone -o booyah instead, then you will have booyah/master as your default remote branch. That means, we can use our default branch name as

问题 In the Pro Git book, it says “origin” is not special Just like the branch name “master” does not have any special meaning in Git, neither does “origin”. While “master” is the default name for a starting branch when you run git init which is the only reason it’s widely used , “origin” is the default name for a remote when you run git clone. If you run git clone -o booyah instead, then you will have booyah/master as your default remote branch. That means, we can use our default branch name as

问题 In the Pro Git book, it says “origin” is not special Just like the branch name “master” does not have any special meaning in Git, neither does “origin”. While “master” is the default name for a starting branch when you run git init which is the only reason it’s widely used , “origin” is the default name for a remote when you run git clone. If you run git clone -o booyah instead, then you will have booyah/master as your default remote branch. That means, we can use our default branch name as

问题 I am working on analyzing different files between two views in Clearcase. I need to generate output so that I can do this task without an internet connection. What I would like is to run a command that recursively walks through each view and generates a merge/diff output file for each change from view A to view B. This can work like a merge, except that I don't actually want to make any changes. How can I set this up so that I can continue looking at diff output amidst all of these files

问题 I have one (for now) large text data file of 120 MB. Is it a poor practice to put it in the repo? Does it affect search functionality on GitHub? It seems like it is a bad idea because the entire source code is only 900 lines. Not planning on updating the file. Could put it on Dropbox or Google Docs, but then it is separate from the repo. If not GitHub, is there a better way of managing/backing up large data files? 回答1: Put it in the repo if: 1- you want to keep track of the changes 2- it is