spdy

SPDY - without TLS?

狂风中的少年 提交于 2019-12-05 03:14:11
I'm trying to implement SPDY (with Node.js) for use on a high latency connection. Now SPDY uses TLS encryption and this would increase the packet length - something I'm trying to avoid. Is there such thing as a SPDY implementation without the TLS encryption? Many thanks in advance, SPDY's framing layer does not need to run over TLS, but for deployment reasons, it almost always does. It's hard to reliably deploy without running encrypted over port 443, because of intermediaries. Note the SPDY whitepaper says: "To make SSL the underlying transport protocol, for better security and compatibility

Website OK on Firefox but not on Safari (kCFErrorDomainCFNetwork error 303) neither Chrome (net::ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR)

半世苍凉 提交于 2019-12-04 09:20:18
Since some days, my website won't load on Safari nor Chrome on Mac OS X (at home nor on my clients computers). It's working well on Firefox (Mac OS & Windows) and IE / Edge, but not Chrome (Windows). It was well working before that and was not updated since weeks. I'm facing this error on Safari Failed to load resource: The operation couldn’t be completed. (kCFErrorDomainCFNetwork error 303.) And this one on Chrome Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR It seem's to be related to HTTP/2 but I don't really know what is the problem. I saw that a workaround is to clear the cache

SPDY Head of Line blocking

谁都会走 提交于 2019-12-04 08:31:26
问题 I'm having troubles with understanding how SPDY can solve HOL blocking. Quote from: http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000545/ch02.html#TCP_HOL To understand why that is the case, recall that every TCP packet carries a unique sequence number when put on the wire, and the data must be passed to the receiver in-order (Figure 2-8). If one of the packets is lost en route to the receiver, then all subsequent packets must be held in the receiver’s TCP buffer until the lost packet is

How to set up SPDY Protocol over Nginx?

北城余情 提交于 2019-12-03 16:30:20
问题 I have a rails app and want to set up the google SPDY protocol support. But after installing Nginx with SPDY patch and then enabling the spdy in virtual host it does not allow me to restart the nginx instead throws following error. Restarting nginx: nginx: [emerg] invalid parameter "spdy" in /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default:112 nginx: configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test failed I have compiled latest nginx 1.3.13 with spdy patch, here I am mentioning my steps of install wget http:/

Is SPDY any different than http multiplexing over keep alive connections

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2019-12-03 12:27:44
问题 HTTP 1.1 supports keep alive connections, connections are not closed until "Connection: close" is sent. So, if the browser, in this case firefox has network.http.pipelining enabled and network.http.pipelining.maxrequests increased isn't the same effect in the end? I know that these settings are disabled because for some websites this could increase load but I think a simple http header flag could tell the browser that is ok tu use multiplexing and this problem can be solved easier. Wouldn't

How to set up SPDY Protocol over Nginx?

时光怂恿深爱的人放手 提交于 2019-12-03 05:37:44
I have a rails app and want to set up the google SPDY protocol support. But after installing Nginx with SPDY patch and then enabling the spdy in virtual host it does not allow me to restart the nginx instead throws following error. Restarting nginx: nginx: [emerg] invalid parameter "spdy" in /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default:112 nginx: configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test failed I have compiled latest nginx 1.3.13 with spdy patch, here I am mentioning my steps of install wget http://nginx.org/download/nginx-1.3.13.tar.gz tar xvfz nginx-1.3.13.tar.gz cd nginx-1.3.13 # Fetch the SPDY

Automatize HAR files generation from Google Chrome

孤街浪徒 提交于 2019-12-03 03:17:36
问题 Basically what I need is a way to automatize the result of the following operations: open a new tab; open the Network tab in the developer tools; load an URL; select "Save All as HAR". Often, proposed solutions involves the use of PhantomJS, browsermob-proxy, or pcap2har; those won't fit my case since I need to work with SPDY traffic. I tried to dive into the Google Chrome Extensions API and indeed I managed to automatize some tasks, but still no luck for what concerns the HAR files

SPDY Head of Line blocking

帅比萌擦擦* 提交于 2019-12-03 01:02:44
I'm having troubles with understanding how SPDY can solve HOL blocking. Quote from: http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000545/ch02.html#TCP_HOL To understand why that is the case, recall that every TCP packet carries a unique sequence number when put on the wire, and the data must be passed to the receiver in-order (Figure 2-8). If one of the packets is lost en route to the receiver, then all subsequent packets must be held in the receiver’s TCP buffer until the lost packet is retransmitted and arrives at the receiver. Because this work is done within the TCP layer, our application

Android4种网络连接方式HttpClient、HttpURLConnection、OKHttp和Volley优缺点

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-01 13:51:37
.. 1.HttpClient 优点:apache httpclient高效稳定,有很多API 缺点:由于API太多,很难在不破坏兼容性的情况下对它进行升级和扩展,维护成本高,故android 开发团队不愿意在维护该库而是转投更为轻便的httpurlconnection Apache HttpClient早就不推荐httpclient,5.0之后干脆废弃,后续会删除。6.0删除了HttpClient。Java开发用HttpClient,官方推荐Android开发用HttpUrlConnection。 2.HttpURLConnection 优点:HttpURLConnection是一种多用途、轻量极的HTTP客户端,使用它来进行HTTP操作可以适用于大多数的应用程序。虽然HttpURLConnection的API提供的比较简单,但是同时这也使得我们可以更加容易地去使用和扩展它。比较轻便,灵活,易于扩展。 缺点:在Android 2.2版本之前,HttpURLConnection一直存在着一些令人厌烦的bug。比如说对一个可读的InputStream调用close()方法时,就有可能会导致连接池失效了。那么我们通常的解决办法就是直接禁用掉连接池的功能。 在android 2.2及以下版本中HttpUrlConnection存在着一些bug,所以建议在android 2

Android4种网络连接方式HttpClient、HttpURLConnection、OKHttp和Volley优缺点

為{幸葍}努か 提交于 2019-12-01 13:42:43
.. 1.HttpClient 优点:apache httpclient高效稳定,有很多API 缺点:由于API太多,很难在不破坏兼容性的情况下对它进行升级和扩展,维护成本高,故android 开发团队不愿意在维护该库而是转投更为轻便的httpurlconnection Apache HttpClient早就不推荐httpclient,5.0之后干脆废弃,后续会删除。6.0删除了HttpClient。Java开发用HttpClient,官方推荐Android开发用HttpUrlConnection。 2.HttpURLConnection 优点:HttpURLConnection是一种多用途、轻量极的HTTP客户端,使用它来进行HTTP操作可以适用于大多数的应用程序。虽然HttpURLConnection的API提供的比较简单,但是同时这也使得我们可以更加容易地去使用和扩展它。比较轻便,灵活,易于扩展。 缺点:在Android 2.2版本之前,HttpURLConnection一直存在着一些令人厌烦的bug。比如说对一个可读的InputStream调用close()方法时,就有可能会导致连接池失效了。那么我们通常的解决办法就是直接禁用掉连接池的功能。 在android 2.2及以下版本中HttpUrlConnection存在着一些bug,所以建议在android 2