let

let vs def in clojure

我的未来我决定 提交于 2019-11-29 00:58:15
I want to make a local instance of a Java Scanner class in a clojure program. Why does this not work: ; gives me: count not supported on this type: Symbol (let s (new Scanner "a b c")) but it will let me create a global instance like this: (def s (new Scanner "a b c")) I was under the impression that the only difference was scope, but apparently not. What is the difference between let and def ? Rayne The problem is that your use of let is wrong. Let works like this: (let [identifier (expr)]) So your example should be something like this: (let [s (Scanner. "a b c")] (exprs)) You can only use

A javascript 'let' global variable is not a property of 'window' unlike a global 'var' [duplicate]

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-11-28 19:45:55
This question already has an answer here: Do let statements create properties on the global object? 5 answers I used to check if a global var has been defined with: if (window['myvar']==null) ... or if (window.myvar==null) ... It works with var myvar Now that I am trying to switch to let, this does not work anymore. var myvar='a'; console.log(window.myvar); // gives me a let mylet='b'; console.log(window.mylet); // gives me undefined Question: With a global let , is there any place I can look if something has been defined like I could with var from the window object? More generally : Is var

Let vs. Binding in Clojure

大兔子大兔子 提交于 2019-11-28 15:43:29
问题 I understand that they're different since one works for setting *compile-path* and one doesn't. However, I need help with why they're different. let creates a new scope with the given bindings, but binding ...? 回答1: let creates a lexically scoped immutable alias for some value. binding creates a dynamically scoped binding for some Var . Dynamic binding means that the code inside your binding form and any code which that code calls (even if not in the local lexical scope) will see the new

How to express let* as a lambda expression (not the regular let)

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-11-28 08:06:59
问题 I have a scheme related question, how can we implement let* as a lambda expression. To be more precise, I am not wondering about the "regular" let, but the let with * which lets us use one let expression within another. 回答1: The let* form is a series of nested lambda s. For example, this: (let* ((a 10) (b (+ 10 a))) (+ a b)) Is equivalent to this: ((lambda (a) ((lambda (b) (+ a b)) (+ 10 a))) 10) 回答2: Since you are not wondering about the 'regular' let , if a let* can be converted into let

Getting a let value outside a function

强颜欢笑 提交于 2019-11-28 05:35:48
问题 Hello I'm new at swift programming and i want to get label value from loadData() to use use for my path (reference) to my database on dbRef!.child(place+"/placeLabel") . What I mean?! I read data that are on "Dio Con Dio" node. That happens because the value place is let place = "Dio Con Dio" . So, my application doesn't load data from "Paradosiako - Panorama" node. I want to load everything from database and i thought that if i could make place value to change to the next node, it could read

v8 JavaScript performance implications of const, let, and var?

佐手、 提交于 2019-11-28 04:49:09
Regardless of functional differences, does using the new keywords 'let' and 'const' have any generalized or specific impact on performance relative to 'var'? After running the program: function timeit(f, N, S) { var start, timeTaken; var stats = {min: 1e50, max: 0, N: 0, sum: 0, sqsum: 0}; var i; for (i = 0; i < S; ++i) { start = Date.now(); f(N); timeTaken = Date.now() - start; stats.min = Math.min(timeTaken, stats.min); stats.max = Math.max(timeTaken, stats.max); stats.sum += timeTaken; stats.sqsum += timeTaken * timeTaken; stats.N++ } var mean = stats.sum / stats.N; var sqmean = stats.sqsum

How to “let” in lambda expression?

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-11-28 04:29:49
How can I rewrite this linq query to Entity on with lambda expression? I want to use let keyword or an equivalent in my lambda expression. var results = from store in Stores let AveragePrice = store.Sales.Average(s => s.Price) where AveragePrice < 500 && AveragePrice > 250 For some similar questions like what is commented under my question, it's suggested to .Select(store=> new { AveragePrice = store.Sales.Average(s => s.Price), store}) which will calculate AveragePrice for each item, while in Query style I mentioned, let expression prevents to calculate average many times. So, you can use the

Is there any reason not to abandon “var”?

送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-11-28 03:47:45
问题 In the process of learning JavaScript I learned that Let and const were introduced to fix the problems of Var regarding the global scope and hoisting and not giving an error if re-declared. Now can I write the code completely without using var ? or should I know about them for now and wait till they becomes widely "acceptable"? In other words, for the time being should I be worried about compatibility issues if I only used let and const ? 回答1: To answer the question directly - no, you can't ,

let var or var to let

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-11-28 03:02:44
问题 In the last couple of months, I've been learning a lot about JavaScript. Having abused the languages for years, I dare say that I now have a better understanding of the language and I've come to love the benefits of its functional nature. Lately I've taken up learning Scheme, but that's just for fun. Browsing the MDN reference I noticed that JS, though lacking block scope, does have a keyword that can be used to declare a variable local to a given block, much like Scheme's let : for (var i=0

Why was the name 'let' chosen for block-scoped variable declarations in JavaScript?

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-11-28 02:34:44
I understand why var takes that name - it is variable, const - it is a constant, but what is the meaning behind the name for let , which scopes to the current block? Let it be? Let is a mathematical statement that was adopted by early programming languages like Scheme and Basic. Variables are considered low level entities not suitable for higher levels of abstraction, thus the desire of many language designers to introduce similar but more powerful concepts like in Clojure, F#, Scala, where let might mean a value, or a variable that can be assigned, but not changed , which in turn lets the