java-14

Define default constructor for record

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2020-05-24 20:16:56
问题 I have a record and want to add default constructor to it. public record Record(int recordId) { public Record { } } But it created constructor with int param. public final class Record extends java.lang.Record { private final int recordId; public Record(int); //other method } How can we add a default constructor to a record? 回答1: To split hairs, you cannot ever define a default constructor, because a default constructor is generated by the compiler when there are no constructors defined, thus

Define default constructor for record

偶尔善良 提交于 2020-05-24 20:16:28
问题 I have a record and want to add default constructor to it. public record Record(int recordId) { public Record { } } But it created constructor with int param. public final class Record extends java.lang.Record { private final int recordId; public Record(int); //other method } How can we add a default constructor to a record? 回答1: To split hairs, you cannot ever define a default constructor, because a default constructor is generated by the compiler when there are no constructors defined, thus

Pattern matching instanceof [closed]

混江龙づ霸主 提交于 2020-05-23 06:50:27
问题 Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 5 hours ago . I came across this amazing topic on https://www.baeldung.com/java-pattern-matching-instanceof. But when I try to run the following code, it throws compile time error: if(obj instanceof String s) { System.out.println(s); } I am using Java 14. 回答1: This is a preview feature in Java 14, see JEP 305 and

Pattern matching instanceof [closed]

半腔热情 提交于 2020-05-23 06:50:07
问题 Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 5 hours ago . I came across this amazing topic on https://www.baeldung.com/java-pattern-matching-instanceof. But when I try to run the following code, it throws compile time error: if(obj instanceof String s) { System.out.println(s); } I am using Java 14. 回答1: This is a preview feature in Java 14, see JEP 305 and

How to enable helpful NullPointerExceptions in gradle test

拜拜、爱过 提交于 2020-05-14 18:16:46
问题 I want to put the flag -XX:+ShowCodeDetailsInExceptionMessages to enable helpful NPEs (https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/358) on the tests I tried tasks.withType<Test> { jvmArgs("-XX:+ShowCodeDetailsInExceptionMessages") testLogging { setExceptionFormat("full") // Prints the message of the exception } } But the NPEs have still no messages. Here's my java version java -version openjdk version "14.0.1" 2020-04-14 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.1+7) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.1+7,

How to enable helpful NullPointerExceptions in gradle test

戏子无情 提交于 2020-05-14 18:16:27
问题 I want to put the flag -XX:+ShowCodeDetailsInExceptionMessages to enable helpful NPEs (https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/358) on the tests I tried tasks.withType<Test> { jvmArgs("-XX:+ShowCodeDetailsInExceptionMessages") testLogging { setExceptionFormat("full") // Prints the message of the exception } } But the NPEs have still no messages. Here's my java version java -version openjdk version "14.0.1" 2020-04-14 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.1+7) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.1+7,

Do Java 14 records actually save memory over a similar class declaration or are they more like syntactic sugar?

人盡茶涼 提交于 2020-05-12 15:57:29
问题 I’m hoping that Java 14 records actually use less memory than a similar data class. Do they or is the memory usage the same? 回答1: To add to the basic analysis performed by @lugiorgi and a similar noticeable difference that I could come up with analyzing the byte code, is in the implementation of toString , equals and hashcode . On one hand, previously used class with overridden Object class APIs looking like public class City { private final Integer id; private final String name; // all-args,

Do Java 14 records actually save memory over a similar class declaration or are they more like syntactic sugar?

空扰寡人 提交于 2020-05-12 15:54:33
问题 I’m hoping that Java 14 records actually use less memory than a similar data class. Do they or is the memory usage the same? 回答1: To add to the basic analysis performed by @lugiorgi and a similar noticeable difference that I could come up with analyzing the byte code, is in the implementation of toString , equals and hashcode . On one hand, previously used class with overridden Object class APIs looking like public class City { private final Integer id; private final String name; // all-args,

Lombok getter/setter vs Java 14 record

不羁岁月 提交于 2020-05-12 11:39:12
问题 I love project Lombok but in these days I'm reading and trying some of the new features of java 14. Inside the new capability, there is the record keyword that allows creating a class with already built-in the following functionality: constructor, private final fields, accessors, equals/hashCode, getters, toString methods. Now my question is: is better to rely on the feature of Lombok or should we start using the record functionality: Is better to use this: record Person (String name, String

PMD plugin fails with Java 14: Unsupported targetJdk

喜你入骨 提交于 2020-05-09 07:00:29
问题 I am trying to have a pom.xml file with PMD plugin integrated into build stage. PMD version 3.13.0 Oracle JDK 14 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <project xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>group</groupId> <artifactId>artifact</artifactId> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> <packaging>jar