intrinsics

c++ SSE SIMD framework [closed]

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-12-02 15:15:41
Does anyone know an open-source C++ x86 SIMD intrinsics library? Intel supplies exactly what I need in their integrated performance primitives library, but I can't use that because of the copyrights all over the place. EDIT I already know the intrinsics provided by the compilers. What I need is a convenient interface to use them. p12 Take a look at libsimdpp header-only C++ SIMD wrapper library. The library supports several instruction sets via single interface: SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, XOP, FMA3/4, NEON, NEONv2, Altivec. All of Clang, GCC, MSVC and ICC are suported. Any

Is it possible to use SIMD on a serial dependency in a calculation, like an exponential moving average filter?

眉间皱痕 提交于 2019-12-02 11:42:18
问题 I'm processing multiple (independent) Exponential Moving Average 1-Pole filters on different parameters I have within my Audio application, with the intent of smooth each param value at audio rate: for (int i = 0; i < mParams.GetSize(); i++) { mParams.Get(i)->SmoothBlock(blockSize); } ... inline void SmoothBlock(int blockSize) { double inputA0 = mValue * a0; for (int sampleIndex = 0; sampleIndex < blockSize; sampleIndex++) { mSmoothedValues[sampleIndex] = z1 = inputA0 + z1 * b1; } } I'd like

Semantics of __ddiv_ru

风流意气都作罢 提交于 2019-12-02 10:58:22
From the documentation of __ddiv_ru I expect that the following code result is ceil(8/32) = 1.0, instead I obtain 0.25. #include <iostream> using namespace std; __managed__ double x; __managed__ double y; __managed__ double r; __global__ void ceilDiv() { r = __ddiv_ru(x,y); } int main() { x = 8; y = 32; r = -1; ceilDiv<<<1,1>>>(); cudaDeviceSynchronize(); cout << "The ceil of " << x << "/" << y << " is " << r << endl; return 1; } What am I missing? talonmies The result you are obtaining is correct. The intrinsic you are using implements double precision division with a specific IEEE 754-2008

Successful compilation of SSE instruction with qmake (but SSE2 is not recognized)

断了今生、忘了曾经 提交于 2019-12-02 08:54:44
问题 I'm trying to compile and run my code migrated from Unix to windows. My code is pure C++ and not using Qt classes. it is fine in Unix. I'm also using Qt creator as an IDE and qmake.exe with -spec win32-g++ for compiling. As I have sse instructions within my code, I have to include emmintrin.h header. I added: QMAKE_FLAGS_RELEASE += -O3 -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse3 -msse2 -msse QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE += -O3 -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse3 -msse2 -msse In the .pro file. I have been able to compile my code

Move an int64_t to the high quadwords of an AVX2 __m256i vector

时间秒杀一切 提交于 2019-12-02 06:05:28
问题 This question is similar to [1]. However I didn't quite understand how it addressed inserting to high quadwords of a ymm using a GPR. Additionally I want the operation not use any intermediate memory accesses. Can it be done with AVX2 or below (I don't have AVX512)? [1] How to move double in %rax into particular qword position on %ymm or %zmm? (Kaby Lake or later) 回答1: My answer on the linked question didn't show a way to do that because it can't be done very efficiently without AVX512F for a

Test case for adcx and adox

拥有回忆 提交于 2019-12-02 05:57:26
问题 I'm testing Intel ADX add with carry and add with overflow to pipeline adds on large integers. I'd like to see what expected code generation should look like. From _addcarry_u64 and _addcarryx_u64 with MSVC and ICC, I thought this would be a suitable test case: #include <stdint.h> #include <x86intrin.h> #include "immintrin.h" int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { #define MAX_ARRAY 100 uint8_t c1 = 0, c2 = 0; uint64_t a[MAX_ARRAY]={0}, b[MAX_ARRAY]={0}, res[MAX_ARRAY]; for(unsigned int i=0; i<

Is it possible to use SIMD on a serial dependency in a calculation, like an exponential moving average filter?

折月煮酒 提交于 2019-12-02 04:27:12
I'm processing multiple (independent) Exponential Moving Average 1-Pole filters on different parameters I have within my Audio application, with the intent of smooth each param value at audio rate: for (int i = 0; i < mParams.GetSize(); i++) { mParams.Get(i)->SmoothBlock(blockSize); } ... inline void SmoothBlock(int blockSize) { double inputA0 = mValue * a0; for (int sampleIndex = 0; sampleIndex < blockSize; sampleIndex++) { mSmoothedValues[sampleIndex] = z1 = inputA0 + z1 * b1; } } I'd like to take advantage of CPU SIMD instructions, processing them in parallel, but I'm not really sure how I

SSE half loads (_mm_loadh_pi / _mm_loadl_pi) issue warnings

孤人 提交于 2019-12-02 03:36:56
问题 I have borrowed a matrix inversion algorithm from Intel website: http://download.intel.com/design/PentiumIII/sml/24504301.pdf It uses _mm_loadh_pi and _mm_loadl_pi to load the 4x4 matrix coefficients and do a partial shuffling at the same time. The performance improvement in my app is significant, and if I do a classic load/shuffle of the matrix using _mm_load_ps, it's slightly slower. But this load approach issues compilation warnings : "tmp1 is used uninitialized in this function" __m128

Move an int64_t to the high quadwords of an AVX2 __m256i vector

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-12-02 03:35:30
This question is similar to [1]. However I didn't quite understand how it addressed inserting to high quadwords of a ymm using a GPR. Additionally I want the operation not use any intermediate memory accesses. Can it be done with AVX2 or below (I don't have AVX512)? [1] How to move double in %rax into particular qword position on %ymm or %zmm? (Kaby Lake or later) My answer on the linked question didn't show a way to do that because it can't be done very efficiently without AVX512F for a masked broadcast ( vpbroadcastq zmm0{k1}, rax ). But it's actually not all that bad using a scratch

SSE half loads (_mm_loadh_pi / _mm_loadl_pi) issue warnings

情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2019-12-02 02:38:13
I have borrowed a matrix inversion algorithm from Intel website: http://download.intel.com/design/PentiumIII/sml/24504301.pdf It uses _mm_loadh_pi and _mm_loadl_pi to load the 4x4 matrix coefficients and do a partial shuffling at the same time. The performance improvement in my app is significant, and if I do a classic load/shuffle of the matrix using _mm_load_ps, it's slightly slower. But this load approach issues compilation warnings : "tmp1 is used uninitialized in this function" __m128 tmp1; tmp1 = _mm_loadh_pi(_mm_loadl_pi(tmp1, (__m64*)(src)), (__m64*)(src+ 4)); Which makes sense in a