intersection

Intersections of 3D polygons in python

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-12-05 21:17:05
Are there any open source tools or libraries (ideally in python) that are available for performing lots of intersections with 3D geometry read from an ESRI shapefile? Most of the tests will be simple line segments vs polygons. I've looked into OGR 1.7.1 / GEOS 3.2.0, and whilst it loads the data correctly, the resulting intersections aren't correct, and most of the other tools available seem to build on this work. Whilst CGAL would have been an alternative, it's license isn't suitable. The Boost generic geometry library looks fantastic, but the api is huge, and doesn't seem to support wkt or

Determining which screen a window is on (by checking where the most surfacearea is located)

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-12-05 19:55:30
I'm currently determining which screen a window is on, by checking on which screen it's very left-top position is. Now I'd like to change that so that I can find out on which scren the most surface area of the window is to be found. Any ideas how that can be accomplished? Here is my old code: (it simply moves the active window between all available screens when pressing F1) F1:: WinGetPos, X, Y,,, A window := {x:X,y:Y} monitors := GetMonitors() Loop % monitors.MaxIndex() { curMonitor := monitors[A_Index] If IsPointInRectange(window,curMonitor) { nextMonitorIndex := (A_Index = monitors.MaxIndex

Looking for an ultrafast data store to perform intersect operations

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-12-05 18:42:43
I've been using Redis for a while as a backend for Resque and now that I'm looking for a fast way to perform intersect operation on large sets of data, I decided to give Redis a shot. I've been conducting the following test: — x , y and z are Redis sets, they all contain approx. 1 million members (random integers taken from a seed array containing 3M+ members). — I want to intersect x y and z , so I'm using sintersectstore (to avoid overheating caused by data retrieval from the server to the client) sinterstore r x y z — the resulting set ( r ) contains about half a million members, Redis

Finding the intersection of 2 arbitrary cubes in 3d

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-12-05 18:01:14
So, I'd like to figure out a function that allows you to determine if two cubes of arbitrary rotation and size intersect. If the cubes are not arbitrary in their rotation (but locked to a particular axis) the intersection is simple; you check if they intersect in all three dimensions by checking their bounds to see if they cross or are within one another in all three dimensions. If they cross or are within in only two, they do not intersect. This method can be used to determine if the arbitrary cubes are even candidates for intersection, using their highest/lowest x, y, and z to create an

Finding the intersection of a curve from polyfit

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-12-05 12:52:38
This seems simple but I can't quite figure it out. I have a curve calculated from x,y data. Then I have a line. I want to find the x, y values for where the two intersect. Here is what I've got so far. It's super confusing and doesn't give the correct result. I can look at the graph and find the intersection x value and calculate the correct y value. I'd like to remove this human step. import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from pylab import * from scipy import linalg import sys import scipy.interpolate as interpolate import scipy.optimize as optimize w = np.array([0.0, 11

Intersection of variable number of lists

假如想象 提交于 2019-12-05 12:36:37
I define intersection of two lists as follows: def intersect(a, b): return list(set(a) & set(b)) For three arguments it would look like: def intersect(a, b, c): return (list(set(a) & set(b) & set(c)) Can I generalize this function for variable number of lists? The call would look for example like: >> intersect([1, 2, 2], [2, 3, 2], [2, 5, 2], [2, 7, 2]) [2] EDIT: Python can only achieve it this way? intersect([ [1, 2, 2], [2, 3, 2], [2, 5, 2], [2, 7, 2] ]) [2] Use the * -list-to-argument operator and instead of your custom function use set.intersection : >>> lists = [[1, 2, 2], [2, 3, 2], [2,

Connect an even number of nodes without intersection

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-12-05 08:04:45
I have two sets of n nodes. Now I want to connect each node from one set with another node from the other set. The resulting graph should have no intersections. I know of several sweep line algorithms ( Bentley-Ottmann-Algorithm to check where intersections occur, but I couldn't find an algorithm to solve those intersections, except for a brute-force approach. Each node from one set can be connected to any other node within the other set. Any pointers to (an efficient) algorithm that solves this problem? No implementation needed. EDIT1 : Here is one solution to the problem for n=7 : The black

Intersecting Volume in Matlab

匆匆过客 提交于 2019-12-05 05:56:07
问题 I have developed a code that takes a set of 3D coords, and performs triangulation to generate the convex hull/Delaunay . This has gone well and using the Deluanay triangulation I can test whether points are contained in a given volume using tsearchn. Now I want to take two of such 3D volumes, and test whether they intersect. Futhermore I would like to know what the percentage of volume A is intersected by Volume B. I think that I could generate a mesh grid of points that are within one of the

Intersection of two Counters

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-12-05 05:40:52
I'm trying to find the shared elements (and the shared number of occurrences) between two lists. For example, the intersection of these two lists: a = [1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 1] b = [1, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9] should return Counter({1: 2, 3: 1, 5: 1, 7: 1}) or something similar, e.g. {1: 2, 3: 1, 5: 1, 7: 1} or [1, 1, 3, 5, 7] (order of the list doesn't matter). I already have an approach that works: cnts_a = Counter(a) cnts_b = Counter(b) cnts_a_b = Counter() # counter for the shared values for key in set(cnts_a).intersection(cnts_b): cnts_a_b[key] = min(cnts_a[key], cnts_b[key]) But perhaps there

Is there a better way to find set intersection for Search engine code?

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-05 05:18:29
问题 I have been coding up a small search engine and need to find out if there is a faster way to find set intersections. Currently, I am using a Sorted linked list as explained in most search engine algorithms. i.e for every word I have a list of documents sorted in a list and then find the intersection among the lists. The performance profiling of the case is here. Any other ideas for a faster set intersection? 回答1: An efficient way to do it is by "zig-zag": Assume your terms is a list T :