inner-join

Better way to select all columns from first table and only one column from second table on inner join

≡放荡痞女 提交于 2019-11-29 06:39:39
问题 Graphical Explaination Table 1's columns: |a|b|c|d|e| Table 2's columns: |a|x|y|z| I want only a, b, c, d, e, x. I only want column a from table 1, not column a from table 2. Wordy Explaination I have two tables with one column sharing a common name. If I use a Select * and use an inner join, I get all the columns returned including two columns with the same name. I want to select everything from the first table, and only one column from the second table. Right now I am specifing every single

How to determine what is more effective: DISTINCT or WHERE EXISTS?

拥有回忆 提交于 2019-11-29 06:17:24
For example, I have 3 tables: user , group and permission , and two many2many relationships between them: user_groups and group_permissions . I need to select all permissions of given user, without repeats. Every time I encounter a similar problem, I can not determine which version of a query better: SELECT permisson_id FROM group_permission WHERE EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM user_groups WHERE user_groups.user_id = 42 AND user_groups.group_id = group_permission.group_id ) SELECT DISTINCT permisson_id FROM group_permission INNER JOIN user_groups ON user_groups.user_id = 42 AND user_groups.group_id =

what is the difference between join keyword and inner join keyword in oracle sql? [duplicate]

百般思念 提交于 2019-11-29 05:34:06
This question already has an answer here: Difference between JOIN and INNER JOIN 6 answers I can't find documentations on the key word join but I saw examples on the web using it. I was doing some experiment with it in Oracle hr schema, where I have table departments : deparment_name manager_id location_id A table employees : first_name employee_id And table locations : location_id city Query should return the department_name, first_name of the manager of the department, and the city where the department is located. The code using the keyword join seem to return the some result in comparison

Configure Map Side join for multiple mappers in Hadoop Map/Reduce

折月煮酒 提交于 2019-11-29 05:05:39
I have a question about configuring Map/Side inner join for multiple mappers in Hadoop. Suppose I have two very large data sets A and B, I use the same partition and sort algorithm to split them into smaller parts. For A, assume I have a(1) to a(10), and for B I have b(1) to b(10). It is assured that a(1) and b(1) contain the same keys, a(2) and b(2) have the same keys, and so on. I would like to setup 10 mappers, specifically, mapper(1) to mapper(10). To my understanding, Map/Side join is a pre-processing task prior to the mapper, therefore, I would like to join a(1) and b(1) for mapper(1),

When should I use an INNER -LOOP- JOIN instead of an INNER JOIN

℡╲_俬逩灬. 提交于 2019-11-29 01:43:46
问题 Today I learned about a thing in SQL Server called INNER LOOP JOIN. What does this mean? (Google is not helping .. or should I say ... the blog posts about it are a bit .. technical and are blowing my mind). Also, what are some common scenarios that would be a good idea to use an INNER LOOP JOIN over a standard INNER JOIN ? 回答1: LOOP | HASH | MERGE are Join hints, specifying that the join in the query should use looping, hashing, or merging. Using LOOP |HASH | MERGE JOIN enforces a particular

Mysql query to join three tables

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-11-28 21:30:01
I am using this query: SELECT a.sales_id, d.bus_title, a.cat_id FROM tbl_sales a INNER JOIN tb_category b ON a.cat_id = b.cat_id INNER JOIN tbl_business d ON d.bus_id = a.bus_id which produces this result: sales_id | bus_title |cat_id ----------|----------------|------------ 1 | Business 1 | 6 2 | Business 12 | 12 3 | Business 123 | 25 I changed the field cat_id into a new table named tb_sales_category which contains the fields sales_category_id , sales_id , cat_id . How can I write the new query by joining this table too to, get the same result as above? I am kind of new to databases, need

Multiple inner joins with multiple tables

不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2019-11-28 17:51:16
So I have four tables. Each table has a single id for the previous table id. So my in click table has an id and an id for the ad from which it came. In the ad table, it has an id for the ad and one for the campaign it's from. So here's an example. Table4 - id company table_id 11 hp 20 12 apple 23 13 kohls 26 14 target 21 15 borders 28 Table3 - id value table2_id 21 ks 53 22 al 54 23 tx 53 24 fl 55 25 co 51 Table2 - id value table1_id 51 ks 34 52 al 34 53 tx 33 54 fl 35 55 co 31 Table1 - id value 31 ks 32 al 33 tx 34 fl 35 co So to find out where the values in Table 4 came from, I need to work

If there a way I can inner join a MS Sql table to a MySql Table in one query using MySql?

狂风中的少年 提交于 2019-11-28 14:04:32
I have 2 servers one servers runs Microsoft SQL Server and the other one is using MySql. I need to be able to inner join a table from MS SQL name it "A" to a table "B" located on a different server that uses MySql So I want to be able to do something like this SELECT A.*, B.* FROM A INNER JOIN B ON A.id=B.id LIMIT 100 How can I do this? note that both servers are on the same network. 1st link on google states... you need to install this: http://www.mysql.com/products/connector/ and follow this guide: http://technikhil.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/getting-microsoft-sql-server-and-mysql-to-talk/ to

join two json files based on common key with jq utility or alternative way from command line

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-11-28 09:08:06
问题 I have 2 json files with common key and I need to JOIN them with jq utility or alternative way from command line As follows: (for example: jq -join -key "id" jsonFile1 jsonFile2) jsonFile1: {"id":"10","data":"abc"} {"id":"20","data":"xyz"} {"id":"30","data":"qwe"} {"id":"40","data":"wsx"} {"id":"50","data":"zxc"} jsonFile2: {"id":"60","content":"ert"} {"id":"40","content":"tgb"} {"id":"10","content":"yui"} {"id":"30","content":"ujm"} {"id":"70","content":"rfv"} output: {"id":"10","data":"abc"

SQL INNER JOIN question

不想你离开。 提交于 2019-11-28 08:17:24
问题 I'm creating a query that will display information for a record which is derived from 8 tables. The developer who originally wrote the query used a combination of 'where this equals this' AND 'this equals this' to create the joins. I have since changed the query to use INNER JOINS. I wondered if my approach was better than utilising a combination of WHERE operators. On a measure of good practice, is a combination of INNER JOINS a good option or should I be employing a different technique. 回答1