connection-pooling

Connection Pooling using Jetty, in Oracle

十年热恋 提交于 2019-12-04 07:27:27
I am trying to implement the concept of ConnectionPooling in Oracle using Jetty server. I have tried the following that I saw on a tutorial. It is working if I deploy using Tomcat server, but Jetty seems to be giving me an unusual error . Details are below - I have a class called TestServlet.java defined as - import java.io.IOException; import java.sql.*; import javax.naming.*; import javax.servlet.*; import javax.servlet.annotation.WebServlet; import javax.servlet.http.*; import javax.sql.DataSource; @SuppressWarnings("serial") @WebServlet("/TestServlet") public class TestServlet extends

HikariCP and maxLifetime

房东的猫 提交于 2019-12-04 06:53:49
I moved my project to HikariCP . Everything is going fine so far, but with one setting I'm having trouble. It's the .setMaxLifetime(30*1000) setting in HikariConfig object. I get this warning WARN com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariConfig - maxLifetime is less than 120000ms, using default 1800000ms. I know that they recommend not setting is that low as I am trying to. But Unfortunately due to circumstances that I can not change, every TCP connection that is open longer than 50 secods will be terminated in our production environment. i don't know your HikariCP Version, but in the version 2.2.4 you will

When should I use connection pooling with MySQL in NodeJS

有些话、适合烂在心里 提交于 2019-12-04 05:48:30
Working with the Node-MySql module: From my understanding multithreaded programs benefit more from pooling connections than singlethreaded ones. Is this true? And if this logic proves true, what scenario is connection pooling beneficial in a Node.JS application? Jonathan Lonowski Whether single or multithreaded, pooling can still be beneficial in allowing open connections to be reused rather than being closed only to open another immediately after: When you are done with a connection, just call connection.release() and the connection will return to the pool, ready to be used again by someone

Meteor consuming huge number of Mongo connections

房东的猫 提交于 2019-12-04 05:22:20
We've been having this issue in prod for the past few weeks. Every few days, the number of connections to our compose.io Mongo db spikes to nearly 5000, which is the connection limit. There doesn't appear to be any specific trigger for this behavior. The logs look like this: 2018-08-14T00:02:32.000+00:00 aws-eu-west-1-portal.9.dblayer.com mongodb320: syslogd.25 | 212.233.54.22 65418 [13/Aug/2018:23:57:32.327] ft_mongodb/1: Timeout during SSL handshake 2018-08-14T00:02:32.000+00:00 aws-eu-west-1-portal.9.dblayer.com mongodb320: syslogd.25 | 212.233.54.22 65247 [13/Aug/2018:23:57:32.343] ft

how to close connection/datareader when using SqlDataSource or ObjectDataSource

℡╲_俬逩灬. 提交于 2019-12-04 05:21:55
during beta testing we discovered connection pooling error messages . Therefore I have been going through the code and closing down the SqlDataReader objects wherever they have been left unclosed. What I need to know is how to close a datareader (or if there is a need at all to close) that is specified in the SelectStatement attribute of the SqlDataSource or ObjectDataSource tags. Could there be connection leak if they are not handled? Thanks in advance ! I tend to use the "using" keyword, especially when dealing with opening and closing connections to a database. "using" is a shortcut to the

What is the relationship between open SqlConnections in the client app and processes in SQL Server?

纵然是瞬间 提交于 2019-12-04 04:21:33
问题 I just tried to make a simple schema change to a table in a SQL Server database (by using the Design tool in SMSS). Whenever I tried to save the change, it kept timing out. I wondered whether this was due to existing connnections which were 'locking' the table. I decided to kill connections as an experiment. I queried master..sysprocesses to get the current spids for that database, and killed them one by one until I was able to save my schema change. (Not very scientific, but I'm far from an

Classic ASP application experiencing SQL Server “Timeouts” and “SQL Server does not exist or access denied”

别来无恙 提交于 2019-12-04 03:13:57
问题 We've been seeing this problem for a while now and I'm really trying to wrap my head around what's causing it. A couple of times a day we'll see periods where web pages start throwing "[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Timeout expired" then shortly afterward pages start throwing "[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied." We have many different applications that connect to this database server. It averages around 2500 concurrent connections

Maximum Connection Pool Size

血红的双手。 提交于 2019-12-04 03:05:27
问题 I came across below text while reading about Database Connection pool properties: The maximum pool size property specifies the maximum number of available and borrowed (in use) connections that a pool maintains. If the maximum number of connections are borrowed, no connections will be available until a connection is returned to the pool. This property allows the number of connections in the pool to increase as demand increases. At the same time, the property ensures that the pool doesn't grow

JDBC connection pool compatible with App Engine

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2019-12-04 03:01:21
Note: I know about this thread but it is quite old and moreover, the solution did not work for me. I am using App Engine along with Cloud SQL and I would like to share a pool of open connections between all of the application's current users. I have tried several connection pool implementations and they all work perfectly with the local development server, however, when deployed to the cloud, they fail. I suppose that the reason is App Engine's restricted "sandbox" environment. Does anyone know about JDBC connection pool working on App Engine? Apache Commons DBCP ... Caused by: java.lang

Is singleton not good for get JDBC connection? Any good implementation of connection pooling?

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-12-04 02:42:59
问题 I used singleton pattern to get jdbc connection for my standalone application. The code is as following. public static synchronized MysqlConnect getDbCon() { if ( db == null ) { db = new MysqlConnect(); } return db; } But I saw in many discussions singleton in not good for getting connection. Is it true? And the suggested using connection pooling. Can anyone give me a good implementation of connection pooling to use instead of the above code? 回答1: Here's a simple, singleton based