conflict

问题 Im using following JS file on my page https://github.com/loopj/jquery-tokeninput/blob/master/src/jquery.tokeninput.js but Im also having Prototype.js file attached on same page and first script is not working because of Prototype. Can anyone tell me what changes I need to make using var $j = jQuery.noConflict(); so tokeninput.js can work. Hope someone understand what Im trying to ask. Regards. 回答1: Hi I was in the same situation but i have found a solution i would like to share with you This

问题 I look at a merge marker that looked all screwed up. To give you the situation lets have this: public void methodA() { prepare(); try { doSomething(); } catch(Exception e) { doSomethingElse(); } } Now comes in a merge (I use SourceTree for pull). And the marker looks like this: <<<<<<<<< HEAD try { doSomething(); } catch(Exception e) { doSomethingElse(); } ============================ private void methodB() { doOtherStuff(); >>>>>>>> 9832432984384398949873ab } So what the pulled commit does

问题 I'm currently inside a very complicated merge in git, and I have many conflicts. The conflict is about two Ada source files. I would like to make a merge that would ignore both whitespace changes and case changes (as the Ada language is case insensitive). Do you know if there is a way to tell git to ignore some kind of changes before a merge ? My solution is currently to run the GNAT pretty print on both branches before the merge, but if there was a common solution included in git, that would

问题 I'm currently inside a very complicated merge in git, and I have many conflicts. The conflict is about two Ada source files. I would like to make a merge that would ignore both whitespace changes and case changes (as the Ada language is case insensitive). Do you know if there is a way to tell git to ignore some kind of changes before a merge ? My solution is currently to run the GNAT pretty print on both branches before the merge, but if there was a common solution included in git, that would

问题 I am a jQuery novice and each of the following work fine on their own, but get out of time when working together. What am I doing wrong? Any improvement on the code would be appreciated too... It is to be used to rotate advertising. <!--- Header Rotator ---> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#header").load("header.cfm"); var refreshHeader = setInterval(function() { $("#header").load("header.cfm"); }, 10000); }); </script> <!--- Main Rotator ---> <script type=

问题 git is giving me a major headache when using --fixup and --autosquash. I would like to give two examples, one working perfectly fine and the other being a mess. (git version 2.6.2) Working example: First commit: $ git init $ printf '1\n' > test.file $ git add test.file $ git commit -m 'Insert 1 --> first line' $ cat test.file 1 Second commit (BUG): $ printf 'This is\na BUG\n' >> test.file $ git commit -am 'Added line 2 and 3 with BUG' $ cat test.file 1 This is a BUG Third commit: $ sed -i '2i

问题 git is giving me a major headache when using --fixup and --autosquash. I would like to give two examples, one working perfectly fine and the other being a mess. (git version 2.6.2) Working example: First commit: $ git init $ printf '1\n' > test.file $ git add test.file $ git commit -m 'Insert 1 --> first line' $ cat test.file 1 Second commit (BUG): $ printf 'This is\na BUG\n' >> test.file $ git commit -am 'Added line 2 and 3 with BUG' $ cat test.file 1 This is a BUG Third commit: $ sed -i '2i

问题 We are using submodules and we are new to git. We often see merge conflicts for the submodules themselves, no files are conflicted, just the submodule. There are multiple versions listed in the output of git submodule summary . We resolve them by running git add <submodule> in the superproject. But today we had a developer lose a commit of the submodule when she resolved the conflict in this manner. Does running a git add choose the remote version? Shouldn't the contents of the submodule get

问题 I already have following [attr]POFILE merge=merge-po-files locale/*.po POFILE in the .gitattributes and I'd like to get merging of branches to work correctly when the same localization file (e.g. locale/en.po ) has been modified in paraller branches. I'm currently using following merge driver: #!/bin/bash # git merge driver for .PO files (gettext localizations) # Install: # git config merge.merge-po-files.driver "./bin/merge-po-files %A %O %B" LOCAL="${1}._LOCAL_" BASE="${2}._BASE_" REMOTE="$

问题 I did a merge between the trunk and a branch. On the trunk, there is a folder, let's say templates/Toto. On the branch, everything but the folder Toto is there (not a local delete, Toto is simply not in the repo). After I performed the merge (I tried several times), I always end up with a freaking tree conflict "local delete, incoming edit upon merge". However, as I stated, this is NOT a local delete. What is the proper way to solve this? By proper, I definitely don't mean manual copy of Toto