conflict

问题 I am developing an ASP.NET server control that uses jQuery for some client side logic. I have embedded the jQuery file as a resource inside the control. I don't want to restrict the application using the control to that specific version of jQuery and I want to keep using the version of jQuery that I have embedded. I know about the noconflict method but the problem that i see with that is that i have no control over the order of the script tags on the page. If the user's version of jQuery is

问题 I use jqZoom and Bootstrap on my webpage, and Bootstrap breaks the zooming of jqZoom as described in JqZoom and Twitter Bootstrap Conflict I also applied the fix of setting ´max-width:none´ for the zoomable image. This solved the problem in some cases. But if the large image is really large, the zoom behaves as if only a part of the image were present. It seems that it fails to adjust the lense according to size of the image. How can I fix this? You can see the effect in the following two

问题 Here is a lot of what I'm getting: <<<<<<< HEAD code ======= >>>>>>> Merge branch 'master' of code_url into not_master and there are tons of those occurring multiple times in 40+ files. Is there a different way to merge such that it correctly resolves conflicts on its own? I feel like whenever it encounters any simultaneous difference in a location a file, git decides to flip ALL THE TABLES. (╯°□°）╯︵ buıbɹǝɯ ʇıb I looked at rebase, and it MAY have been what I have needed when I started the

问题 I am trying to work out a method of sharing merge conflicts with other members of my team. We have some very large branches and merging them creates a lot of conflicts. I have tried several different methods, and my current attempt involves pushing the files in a conflicted state to the remote repo (leaving the merge markers in the files), and then running an annoyingly long alias to grep through the files and re-create the merge files manually (LOCAL, BASE, REMOTE). I recently found the git

问题 I am trying to work out a method of sharing merge conflicts with other members of my team. We have some very large branches and merging them creates a lot of conflicts. I have tried several different methods, and my current attempt involves pushing the files in a conflicted state to the remote repo (leaving the merge markers in the files), and then running an annoyingly long alias to grep through the files and re-create the merge files manually (LOCAL, BASE, REMOTE). I recently found the git

问题 I have read a lot and lot on this but couldn't figure out what the issue is, and it's pretty weird. I am using version 1.7 for server and latest tortoise version (1.7) for the client. Here's the scenario: I created a parent branch, and then created 1 child branch from it. So, PARENT_BRANCH -> CHILD_BRANCH Add a new directory in CHILD_BRANCH and commit. Using tortoise merge all changes from CHILD_BRANCH to PARENT_BRANCH. I used 'merge a range of revisions' option and didn't specify any

问题 Ok so here is the situation. Been pulling my hair out on this one. I'm a noob at this. Only been using rails for about 6 weeks. I'm using the standard setup package, and my code leverages prototype helpers heavily. Like I said, noob ;) So I'm trying to put in some jQuery effects, like PrettyPhoto. But what happens is that when the page is first loaded, PrettyPhoto works great. However, once someone uses a Prototype helper, like a link created with link_to_remote, Prettyphoto stops working. I

问题 I have a project that was compiling ok within g++(I can't see the version right now) and now on xCode it is not. I think that I got the problem now... I have a String.h file in my project and it seems tha the xCode compiler(that is gcc) is trying to add my own string file from the < cstring >... I am not sure of it, but take a look at this picture http://www.jode.com.br/Joe/xCode1.png from what it looks like, it is including my own instead of the system file, I was wondering... shouldn't

问题 When I open two Wicket web applications in the same browser, it seems there are AJAX conflicts as I see a full page refresh in place of a partial refresh. This is true even if the applications are on different servers and port numbers. I only use the out-of-the-box JavaScript provided by Wicket ( tabbedPanel , onTimerAutoRefresh ). Perhaps it is something related to the fallback function. When only one web application is open, it works without any problems. I don't have a problem on the

问题 When I have several conflicts, is there a way to resolve them all by just telling SVN to keep the version that is in the repository? Unfortunately, we're still using 1.4. 回答1: I believe if you run the command svn revert . -R , you basically undo all changes to your working copy. If there are conflicted files, SVN tosses out your changes and uses the revision you've most recently updated to. Of course, this also gets rid of changes to files that aren't conflicted. 回答2: svn update . --accept