conflict

I'm new to Android dev and I'm almost ready to release a first version of my app :) While testing the signed release apk on my phone, it refuse to install because the debug version is installed with the debug signature. So I have to uninstall the debug version but it delete all my database (and it will do it to my friends who are testing it). Is there a way to manage a debug and a release version of the same app without losing data? I'm not aware of any easy way to do get around the uninstall/reinstall process, so your options include... Buy a second device for testing (some Android devices

NAME git-pull - Fetch from and integrate with another repository or a local branch SYNOPSIS git pull [options] [<repository> [<refspec>…​]] DESCRIPTION Incorporates changes from a remote repository into the current branch. In its default mode, git pull is shorthand for git fetch followed by git merge FETCH_HEAD . More precisely, git pull runs git fetch with the given parameters and calls git merge to merge the retrieved branch heads into the current branch. With --rebase , it runs git rebase instead of git merge . <repository> should be the name of a remote repository as passed to git-fetch[1]

After a merge failed with some conflicts I can list those with git diff , but git difftool won't display them with the difftool set in the config(in my case Kaleidoscope), instead it will just use normal diff. A git difftool comparing with a previous commit will work. Is there a way to use git difftool on merge conflicts? Greets Jan Try git mergetool . Firstly try: git difftool -t <yourtool> If that doesn't work, look at man git-difftool and check the list of supported tools. Check if one of those does what you want, if it does then you've narrowed it down to git not supporting Kaleidoscope,

Is there any chance of getting this two plugins to work together? Right now if I use iscroll in a div with images, Lazy load won't detect when the images should be visible. Thanks. EDIT: As said in one of the comments, I have tried to apply lazyload on scroll like this: onScrollMove: function () { $("img").lazyload(); $('img').on('load',function(){myScroll.refresh();}); } To work correctly I guess I would have to apply the same to onBeforeScrollEnd: onBeforeScrollEnd: function () { $("img").lazyload(); $('img').on('load',function(){myScroll.refresh();}); } But is this solution affecting

Let's suppose that I get a merge conflict on foo/bar.txt when running this: $ git checkout A $ git merge B I'd like to automatically resolve the conflict by taking foo/bar.txt from branch A. (I know what I'm doing, and I do need this. The version in branch B is wrong, and I don't care about losing changes in the working tree in this case.) It seems that I can do it by running these commands: $ git reset foo/bar.txt $ git checkout foo/bar.txt Is there a simpler, single-command solution? Unfortunately these commands change foo/bar.txt even if there is no conflict, and I don't want that. If there

I already have following [attr]POFILE merge=merge-po-files locale/*.po POFILE in the .gitattributes and I'd like to get merging of branches to work correctly when the same localization file (e.g. locale/en.po ) has been modified in paraller branches. I'm currently using following merge driver: #!/bin/bash # git merge driver for .PO files (gettext localizations) # Install: # git config merge.merge-po-files.driver "./bin/merge-po-files %A %O %B" LOCAL="${1}._LOCAL_" BASE="${2}._BASE_" REMOTE="${3}._REMOTE_" # rename to bit more meaningful filenames to get better conflict results cp "${1}" "

After doing a merge and resolving conflicts, is there an "easy" way to just accept the default generated commit message from the command line? One of our developers will resolve all the conflicts, and then do a git commit -m"Merge Commit" which replaces the generated commit message that listed all the conflict files. I would like to have a different flag that would just take the current file without modification. I know there is a -F or --file= option, but that requires knowing the file name all the time. Thank you Obviously the "right" answer here is to get your developer to follow correct

I did a merge between the trunk and a branch. On the trunk, there is a folder, let's say templates/Toto. On the branch, everything but the folder Toto is there (not a local delete, Toto is simply not in the repo). After I performed the merge (I tried several times), I always end up with a freaking tree conflict "local delete, incoming edit upon merge". However, as I stated, this is NOT a local delete. What is the proper way to solve this? By proper, I definitely don't mean manual copy of Toto from trunk to branch. I read the doc, but I'm still stuck. zellus What version(s) of subversion are

I've started Eclipse EGit. In some scenarios it is really not comprehensive. I have local file e.g. pom.xml changed. On git server this file was changed. I do pull , EGIt says: Checkout conflict with files: i.e. pulling stops ( fetch is done, but not merge ), that is OK. However the next is bad experience. I synchronize workspace, put my changes aside and make it the same as FETCH_HEAD. But EGit doesn't want to continue. I replace the file with HEAD revision. But EGit still doesn't want to continue. What standard expected user operation should be with EGit after conflict resolution? UPDATE: I