conflict | 易学教程

How to use git difftool to diff merge conflicts?

阅读更多关于 How to use git difftool to diff merge conflicts?

问题 After a merge failed with some conflicts I can list those with git diff , but git difftool won't display them with the difftool set in the config(in my case Kaleidoscope), instead it will just use normal diff. A git difftool comparing with a previous commit will work. Is there a way to use git difftool on merge conflicts? Greets Jan 回答1: Try git mergetool . 回答2: Firstly try: git difftool -t <yourtool> If that doesn't work, look at man git-difftool and check the list of supported tools. Check

git stash and edited hunks

阅读更多关于 git stash and edited hunks

问题 I totally love git add -p and git stash but I occasionally have the following problem, which is reproduced by the following sequence of commands: git add -p my_file : then I edit a hunk manually (using e ) because the splitting that git suggests does not suit me git stash --keep-index : then I do some testing, and if the tests pass I do not commit git stash pop : now the problem occurs: the file my_file is now considered as conflicted , and git has completely messed with my edited hunk, so I

How to configure Beyond Compare 3 for Eclipse conflict resolution?

阅读更多关于 How to configure Beyond Compare 3 for Eclipse conflict resolution?

What is the correct parameters to get Beyond Compare 3 working with Eclipse/Subclipse conflict resolution? In Preferences > Team > SVN > Diff/Merge there's the option to specify an external program to resolve conflicts. The default parameters are: "${yours}" "${theirs}" "${base}" "${merged}" And it suggests TortoiseMerge settings of this: /theirs:"${theirs}" /base:"${base}" /mine:"${yours}" /merged:"${merged}" But what is the appropriate config for Beyond Compare? Looks like this is correct: "${theirs}" "${yours}" "${base}" "${merged}" Based on this forum post: http://www.scootersoftware.com

How to commit a long Git merge in the middle of resolving conflicts

阅读更多关于 How to commit a long Git merge in the middle of resolving conflicts

I have a big merge going on with over 300 conflicting files. I want to resolve these using mergetool, but there's no way I'm going to finish it all in one sitting. How can I commit the merge and then come back later and continue the same merge? Normally it seems git doesn't allow you to commit if there are conflicts in the index. I'm assuming by "can't do it in one sitting" you actually mean "want to do some other things before I finish" - since you could just leave the partially resolved merge in your work tree otherwise. First, before you go to any trouble, note that you could simply create

Handling conflicts in SVN with Tortoise?

阅读更多关于 Handling conflicts in SVN with Tortoise?

Any time an issue comes up like a merge conflict or something similar, it really slows me down. Can someone explain to me how to force-resolve conflicts? For example, a buddy of mine made an edit to a file on the repository and committed. While he was doing that, I had already renamed that file and made many edits to it on my working copy. When I went to commit, I get the conflict error obviously. The file he edited doesn't even exist anymore on my working copy. How can I tell SVN to simply quit crying about the conflict and force it to accept my working copy (ie, overwrite the head revision

How to set kdiff3 as merge tool for SVN

阅读更多关于 How to set kdiff3 as merge tool for SVN

I would like to be able to resolve conflicts using kdiff3, when SVN notifies me about the conflict. How can I set it as a default tool for this? Jon Ander Ortiz Durántez Go to the Subversion configuration file ( /etc/subversion/config or ~/.subversion/config ), and set merge-tool-cmd variable with your favourite tool: ### Set merge-tool-cmd to the command used to invoke your external ### merging tool of choice. Subversion will pass 4 arguments to ### the specified command: base theirs mine merged # merge-tool-cmd = merge_command Although there is a problem with kdiff3 which does not support

Eclipse EGit Checkout conflict with files: - EGit doesn't want to continue

阅读更多关于 Eclipse EGit Checkout conflict with files: - EGit doesn't want to continue

问题 I've started Eclipse EGit. In some scenarios it is really not comprehensive. I have local file e.g. pom.xml changed. On git server this file was changed. I do pull , EGIt says: Checkout conflict with files: i.e. pulling stops ( fetch is done, but not merge ), that is OK. However the next is bad experience. I synchronize workspace, put my changes aside and make it the same as FETCH_HEAD. But EGit doesn't want to continue. I replace the file with HEAD revision. But EGit still doesn't want to

How to use the default git commit message after resolving merge conflicts?

阅读更多关于 How to use the default git commit message after resolving merge conflicts?

问题 After doing a merge and resolving conflicts, is there an "easy" way to just accept the default generated commit message from the command line? One of our developers will resolve all the conflicts, and then do a git commit -m"Merge Commit" which replaces the generated commit message that listed all the conflict files. I would like to have a different flag that would just take the current file without modification. I know there is a -F or --file= option, but that requires knowing the file name

what causes submodule conflicts in git, and how should they be resolved?

阅读更多关于 what causes submodule conflicts in git, and how should they be resolved?

We are using submodules and we are new to git. We often see merge conflicts for the submodules themselves, no files are conflicted, just the submodule. There are multiple versions listed in the output of git submodule summary . We resolve them by running git add <submodule> in the superproject. But today we had a developer lose a commit of the submodule when she resolved the conflict in this manner. Does running a git add choose the remote version? Shouldn't the contents of the submodule get merged? If she made changes in the submodule and committed them (which I see), then why would that

How can KDiff3 be used properly with TortoiseSVN to resolve conflicts?

阅读更多关于 How can KDiff3 be used properly with TortoiseSVN to resolve conflicts?

问题 I have TortoiseSVN set up to use KDiff3 as the conflict resolution tool (I find it shows more information useful to the merge than the built-in TortoiseMerge does). When I open a file with Tortoise's "Edit Conflicts" command it shows me the three files and I have to select "Merge->Merge Current File" manually. The problem is that KDiff3 saves the result to source_file.working instead of to source_file . So without doing a Save As, the real file with the conflict doesn't get modified. Is there