compatibility

Which Seam framework version is supported in JBoss AS 7? I am planning to use Seam2.2.2, is it compatible with Jboss AS 7? jan groth Yes and no. If you visualize yourself the timeline of Seam, the answer comes from alone: Seam 2.x was created to ease development against Java EE 5 and to serve as an incubator for future standards, mainly Java EE 6 and JSF 2 Java EE 6 took the ideas from Seam 2 (and others) to specify CDI (and improve APIs like JSF) Seam 3 brings new ideas to Java EE 6 and serves as an incubator for future standards, mainly Java EE 7 and JSF 2.x Yes, Seam 2 is - more or less -

I am looking for any information that can be provided regarding problems with the use of Visual Studio 2008 and 2010 on Windows 8 (x64). I have been able find the following article that identifies the acknowledged problems for VS2010 on W8, but I cannot find any similar articles for VS2008. Specifically, I use VS2008 for mobile development so I cannot simply upgrade the projects to 2010/2012 (yet) but I do also have some web application projects and there may even be a couple of console and/or Windows Forms projects kicking around too. I will be wanting to install Visual Studio 2008, 2010 and

I currently have the following CSS, it works in Google Chrome (Webkit), but not in any other browser. Whats the best way to make this compatible with everything? As you can see it is using webkit, but I'm not sure what the moz equivalents are. Many thanks .card{ margin-top: -50px; } .card { width: 286px; height: 224px; -webkit-transform-style: preserve-3d; -webkit-transition: 0.5s; -moz-transform-style: preserve-3d; -moz-transition: 0.5s; } .container:hover .card { -webkit-transform: rotateY(180deg); -moz-transform: rotateY(180deg); } .face { position: absolute; -webkit-backface-visibility:

Following is the error I am getting when I tried 'git svn rebase': Byte order is not compatible at ../../lib/Storable.pm (autosplit into ../../lib/auto/Storable/_retrieve.al) line 380, at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10/Memoize/Storable.pm line 21 The version of perl I am running is: $ perl --version This is perl, v5.10.1 (*) built for i686-cygwin-thread-multi-64int (with 12 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail) When I searched the web for " Byte order is not compatible " and I get numerous hits that shows the Perl doc that says: What this means is that if you have data written by Storable 1.x

Recently, i was trying to give my application administrator rights without system asking for "Do you want to give administrator rights?" and i found a way which is working perfectly. Solution I Found I created a bat file named nonadmin.bat and wrote the below code in it cmd min C set __COMPAT_LAYER=RunAsInvoker && start %1 and if we drag any exe on it, it gives them administrator rights (before it was not letting me access environment variables without it but after draging the file on bat it did work). Question Now my question is:- What actually '__COMPAT_LAYER' means and what does it do? How

I am wondering if a compatibility matrix exists between Springboot and Springcloud? I created a simple project on STS and am running into compatibility issues. <parent> <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId> <version>1.5.1.RELEASE</version> <relativePath /> <!-- lookup parent from repository --> </parent> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId> <artifactId>spring-cloud-dependencies</artifactId> <version>Camden.SR5</version> <type>pom</type> <scope>import</scope> </dependency> <

The C language was used to write UNIX to achieve portability -- the same C language program compiled using different compilers produces different machine instructions. How come Windows OS is able to run on both Intel and AMD processors? AMD and Intel processors(*) have a large set of instructions in common, so it is possible for a compiler or assembler to write binary code which runs "the same" on both. However, different processor families even from one manufacturer have their own sets of instructions, usually referred to as "extensions" or whatever. Ignoring the x87 co-processor, the first