compatibility

Since Java 7 isnt yet as popular as Java 6 I was wondering if I could use some stuff like WebView in latest update of Java 6 JRE out of the box, without having users download JavaFX on their system. No, Java 6 will not run JavaFX 2 out of the box. If developing a new JavaFX application today I recommend targeting a minimum version of Java Runtime 7u9 for the following reasons. Java Runtime 6 and JavaFX for Java Runtime 6 are due to cease public distribution in February of 2013 . Java Runtime for JavaFX only works with a separate download installed - this could be confusing to users of your

I have an application in iphone market which works for iPhone 4s and lower version. So now iPhone 5 has been launched which bigger size screen, my question is what all changes i have to do in my application so that it will be compatible with iPhone 5 also. 1) Do i have to rebuild my app for iPhone 5? 2) Do i have to make changes only in UI ? 3) Will the iPhone 5 will its make it compatible? Your valuable replies will help me a lot. Thanks in advance. Here is my answers, 1) Do i have to rebuild my app for iPhone 5? If you want to utilize the complete screen space, you can add Default-568h@2x

I want to program 64 bit windows assembly (preferably using NASM). I have looked quite a but on google but it seems that I cannot find a 64 bit windows compiler. Some site mentioned ml64 but it seems like it is no longer included in VC++. I have tried with 32 bit assembly, but obviously it just crashes on my 64 bit machine. Is it possible to write, compile and run 32 bit assembly applications on a 64 bit windows machine? Or should it be written and compiled for 64 bits? Thanks. Yasm(*) is a modern, multi-platform NASM-rewritten assembler which is capable of assembling for both x86 and AMD64

A while ago I read about Scala for LLVM and I kept wondering which things in the Scala language/specification/library) only exist to make the JVM happy or improve interop with Java. Considering that running Scala on the LLVM provides much more freedoms and the plan is port the language (and not the whole Java ecosystem around it) which features won't make sense there? Guidance: I'm wondering about things like Object#finalize , the monitor stuff ( notify , wait ), clone vs. Cloneable , no 64-bit array indices, collection sizes limited to 32-bit, java.lang.String , Java reflection, ... The

Examples: "Something %d" and "Something else %d" // Compatible "Something %d" and "Something else %f" // Not Compatible "Something %d" and "Something %d else %d" // Not Compatible "Something %d and %f" and "Something %2$f and %1$d" // Compatible I figured there should be some C function for this, but I'm not getting any relevant search results. I mean the compiler is checking that the format string and the arguments match, so the code for checking this is already written. The only question is how I can call it. I'm using Objective-C, so if there is an Objective-C specific solution that's fine

What changes or code evolution break backward compatibility (mainly binary compatibility)? Is it fully specified anywhere? I checked the Scala language specification , but didn't see any section on the matter like Java Language Specification Ch. 13 Binary Compatibility . huynhjl According to the mailing list, the spec documenting detailing backward compatibility issues does not yet exist but is in the works. For current status and oulook of binary compatibility (mainly of the scala library), see Martin's message to scala-user mailing list. For a migration manager preview, see this page http:/

I am looking for a way to launch a file located on our local file network for use via our local intranet using Firefox or Chrome. The link works well in IE: <a href="\\Start\Of\My\Network\file.xlsx">View Report</a>  but in Firefox it shows: <a href="http://mydomain.com/\\Start\Of\My\Network\file.xlsx">View Report</a>  is there a way to get the link to render properly?...Just a simple click from a href tag. This is not enabled in firefox for security reasons (remember that most computers have files and applications of a sensitive nature located in similar locations, like C:\System\Windows) you

I'm writing an Angular 2 app but am conscious that some users may not be using a browser that can support Angular 2. I have a check for whether Javascript is enabled, I am more interested in whether the user's browser doesn't support certain JS/HTML5/other features required by Angular 2. What would be the best way to assess whether the user's browser supports Angular 2, and display a message if not? I'm aware of e.g. Modernizer , but not sure where to begin as Modernizer's focus seems to be on assembling compatibility checks piecemeal rather than providing a solution that checks for