business-process-management

I have an Activiti project for some business process. The problem is about migration. An existing process has some unfinished tasks. I want to modify the existing process by adding a new step. Now, when I create a new task, this new task will be processed according to the updated process. And unfinished tasks will be processed according to the old process. Let's take the following example: https://spring.io/blog/2015/03/08/getting-started-with-activiti-and-spring-boot In this example, consider the following line: taskVariables.put("telephoneInterviewOutcome", true); Assume that, I have some

I want to get the current position of a single instance in my process. Is it possible to get the name of the activity additionaly to the id as return value? You can get the current position of your process instance using the following code, which will also give you the name of the activity(ies) when the process waits in multiple position. package org.camunda.bpm; import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.List; import java.util.Map; import org.camunda.bpm.engine.ProcessEngine; import org.camunda.bpm.engine.RepositoryService; import org.camunda.bpm.engine.RuntimeService; import org.camunda.bpm

I was trying to find a free and open source BPM tool which is based on asp.net, but unfortunately i fail to find such a tool. But recently I read an article about Windows Workflow Foundation, so does it provide functionality that are similar to open source BPM tools such as Activiti , bonita, Joget, etc. Or Windows Workflow Foundation can not be used to build as full business process workflow as in Activiti and other open source BPM tools. Mike Perrenoud The first thing to remember is that WF is not a BPM tool - but rather a framework that can be leveraged to build a reliable and flexible set

Does the camunda engine provides an API to query all running instances of a certain process? Does this query includes suspended instances too? You can query all running process instance of a process using the following code: package org.camunda.bpm; import org.camunda.bpm.engine.ProcessEngine; import org.camunda.bpm.engine.RepositoryService; import org.camunda.bpm.engine.RuntimeService; import org.camunda.bpm.engine.repository.ProcessDefinition; import org.camunda.bpm.engine.runtime.ProcessInstance; import java.util.List; public class AllRunningProcessInstances { public List<ProcessInstance>

We have used Apache camel as a Workflow engine.First Wehave WebService One and wait for the response and based on the response call WebService 2 or WebService 3.Its a pure WorkFlow and have couple of WorkFlow Steps like this.I have got less chances to work on a BPM product , like JBOSS BPM etc. Other than long running and support for human task any other good reason we have to choose a BPM product ? If both long running and human task support are not needed in our project can we use Camel or JBOSS FUSE to orchestrate business processes ? Thanks, Leo. salaboy Yeah.. as Antoine mention, from the

We are currently in the process of evaluating a BPM engine and I'd really appreciate the community input. I am doing my own due diligence but would also like to hear on the suggestion based on implementation stories. My main evaluation criteria are below open source and OEM friendly license production installations (success stories are a great help) commercial support available open standards support - BPMN dynamic creation/assembly of the workflow based on input embeddable Currently I am evaluating Activiti and JBPM. Bonita open BPM seems like a good candidate as well but never used it. Do

I am evaluating BPM offerings to be used within our application. I wanted to find out the differences between Bonitasoft / jBPM and Activiti Some of these products provide forms generation capabilities - are they any good? Would you use it in place of custom web forms or in addition to custom web forms Thanks take a look at the activiti in action book from manning publication. This is still in MEAP edition so you can download the sample chapter. Start reading from the section that reads "ACTIVITI AND JBPM". It also compares Activiti and Bonitasoft. http://www.manning.com/rademakers2

How one can integrate Activiti Modeler into their own web application and keep all the advantages Maven suggests? The probem is that Activiti Modeler in Maven is part of Activiti Explorer. There are several questions online from people who want to develop their own web applications, use Modeler to edit the processes, but don't need other Explorer features. For example, Activiti BPM without activiti-explorer or How To Integrate Activiti Modeller Into own Web Application I have managed to do this using Maven overlay feature: 1) include overlay of Explorer web app, but include only the Modeler