armv7

When MCR or MRC instructions execute with different cRm or opt2 , then what is the status of cRn register? For example if run: asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r"(val)) or asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r"(val)) then, which register's value will be changed c9 or c13 ? and what is the role of last option(0 or 2)?. here The MCR and MRC instructions are generic coprocessor instructions. What these instructions do depends on the particular hardware you're using, what coprocessors it has, and the values of the opcode and coprocessor register operands ( opcode1 ,

From android developer website, https://developer.android.com/distribute/best-practices/develop/64-bit it is clear that starting August 1, 2019, apps published on Google Play will need to support 64-bit architectures. Our current app has native libraries for armeabi-v7a, arm64-v8a, x86 ABIs but no x86-64. This is because one of the cordova plugins we are using doesn't provide X86-64 support. Will playstore reject the app update or pass it considering there is arm64-v8a support or we will have to drop support for x86 to stay compliant? tl;dr Unity Technologies' User ScottF (1) confirmed with

I will be releasing an app soon, but I specifically want to support iPhone 5 or later. Is there a way of excluding iPhone 4s devices? My app deployment target is iOS9, and iPhone 4S is the oldest device that can have iOS9, but because of screen size constraints I would prefer not to support those devices. No, if you are going to support iPhone you need to support all the iPhones that support the version of the operating system. Apple will reject it for not supporting the 4S. It is a pain, and I have been rejected for it. If your app requires the Metal API, and that requirement is included in

I have a MonoTouch project which builds and runs fine on i386/iOS Simulator. The project references a native (Obj-C) library, which I converted to a MonoTouch DLL by using the btouch process as described in Xamarin's BindingSample: https://github.com/xamarin/monotouch-samples/tree/eb640165f0485ff59b2f80e73ccff382bf4f2083/BindingSample/src/binding So my makefile builds all three architectures (i386, armv6 and armv7), then combines the three outputs to one 'Universal' library, and finally uses btouch to generate a MonoTouch DLL. To be sure that my universal library contains all three

I'm updating my app to ios6 and i having following problem building application with ARMv7 is not possible to use the flag LLVM ... (error MT3001) My system configuration is MonoDevelop 3.0.4.7 MonoTouch 6.0.0.0 Mono 2.10.9 Reference to question: iOS 6 Mono and backward compatibility UPDATE Error is Could not AOT the assembly ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib.dll (MT3001) Verbose output /Users/TEST/Desktop/Xcode_4.5.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/usr/bin/gcc -miphoneos-version-min=3.1 -arch armv7 -std=c99 -I/Developer/MonoTouch/SDKs/MonoTouch.iphoneos.sdk/usr/include

I am trying to analyse a crash log that a customer sent me, but I cannot get it to symbolicate the system library calls. It does symbolicate calls to my own methods correctly. That does not make it very practical to analyse what goes wrong. I have run 'symbolicatecrash -v', to see what is causing the lack of symbolication. The likely cause is this: ## /Users/baraupp/Library/Developer/Xcode/iOS DeviceSupport/6.1.3 (10B329)/Symbols/usr/lib/system/libsystem_kernel.dylib doesn't contain armv7s slice I have checked the mentioned libraries with 'lipo', which says that they contain 'armv7' but no

I used pip to get .whl file for numpy pip wheel --wheel-dir=./ numpy and I have got numpy-1.13.3-cp27-cp27mu-linux_armv7l.whl because I am using ARM platform, but when run pip for protobuf pip wheel --wheel-dir=./ protobuf I got protobuf-3.4.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl So, why isn't linux_armv7l like the case of numpy, I didn't alter the machine and searched for that difference but no information. thanks for advice . Let's split package names by components: numpy — package name 1.13.3 — package version cp27 — the package was compiled to be used with this version of Python cp27mu — compilation flags