问题
I have been getting an intermittent issue when executing to_number function in the where clause on a varchar2 column if number of records exceed a certain number n. I used n as there is no exact number of records on which it happens. On one DB it happens after n was 1 million on another when it was 0.1. million.
E.g. I have a table with 10 million records say Table Country which has field1 varchar2 containing numberic data and Id
If I do a query as an example
select *
from country
where to_number(field1) = 23
and id >1 and id < 100000
This works
But if I do the query
select *
from country
where to_number(field1) = 23
and id >1 and id < 100001
It fails saying invalid number
Next I try the query
select *
from country
where to_number(field1) = 23
and id >2 and id < 100001
It works again
As I only got invalid number it was confusing, but in the log file it said
Memory Notification: Library Cache Object loaded into SGA
Heap size 3823K exceeds notification threshold (2048K)
KGL object name :with sqlplan as (
select c006 object_owner, c007 object_type,c008 object_name
from htmldb_collections
where COLLECTION_NAME='HTMLDB_QUERY_PLAN'
and c007 in ('TABLE','INDEX','MATERIALIZED VIEW','INDEX (UNIQUE)')),
ws_schemas as(
select schema
from wwv_flow_company_schemas
where security_group_id = :flow_security_group_id),
t as(
select s.object_owner table_owner,s.object_name table_name,
d.OBJECT_ID
from sqlplan s,sys.dba_objects d
It seems its related to SGA size, but google did not give me much help on this.
Does anyone have any idea about this issue with TO_NUMBER or oracle functions for large data?
回答1:
Assuming you know that the given range of ids will always result in field1 containing numeric data, you could do this instead:
select *
from (
select /*+NO_MERGE*/ *
from country
where id >1 and id < 100000
)
where to_number(field1) = 23;
回答2:
which has field1 varchar2 containing numberic data
This is not good practice. Numeric data should be kept in NUMBER columns. The reason is simple: if we don't enforce a strong data type we might find ourselves with non-numeric data in our varchar2 column. If that were to happen then a filter like this
where to_number(field1) = 23
would fail with ORA-01722: invalid number.
I can't for certain sure say this is what is happening in your scenario, because I don't understand why apparently insignificant changes in the filters of ID have changed the success of the query. It would be instructive to see the execution plans for the different versions of the queries. But I think it is more likely to be a problem with your data than a bug in the SGA.
回答3:
Suggest doing the following to determine for sure whether there are records containing non-numeric data. As others have said, variations in the execution plan and order of evaluation could explain why the error does not appear consistently.
(assuming SQLPlus as the client)
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
DECLARE
x NUMBER;
BEGIN
FOR rec IN (SELECT id, field1 FROM country) LOOP
BEGIN
x := TO_NUMBER( rec.field1 );
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
dbms_output.put_line( rec.id || ' ' || rec.field1 );
END;
END LOOP;
END;
/
An alternative workaround to your original issue would be to rewrite the query to avoid implicit type conversion, e.g.
SELECT id, TO_NUMBER( field1 )
FROM county
WHERE field1 = '23'
AND <whatever condition on id you want, if any>
回答4:
Consider writing an IS_NUMBER PL/SQL function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION IS_NUMBER (p_input IN VARCHAR2) RETURN NUMBER
AS
BEGIN
RETURN TO_NUMBER (p_input);
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN RETURN NULL;
END IS_NUMBER;
/
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM DUAL WHERE IS_NUMBER ('TEST') IS NOT NULL;
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM DUAL WHERE IS_NUMBER ('123.45') IS NOT NULL;
COUNT(*)
----------
1
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2785033/getting-weird-issue-with-to-number-function-in-oracle