问题
I have a large data.table
that I am collapsing to the month level using ,by
.
There are 5 by vars, with # of levels: c(4,3,106,3,1380)
. The 106 is months, the 1380 is a geographic unit. As in turns out there are some 0's, in that some cells have no values. by
drops these, but I'd like it to keep them.
Reproducible example:
require(data.table)
set.seed(1)
n <- 1000
s <- function(n,l=5) sample(letters[seq(l)],n,replace=TRUE)
dat <- data.table( x=runif(n), g1=s(n), g2=s(n), g3=s(n,25) )
datCollapsed <- dat[ , list(nv=.N), by=list(g1,g2,g3) ]
datCollapsed[ , prod(dim(table(g1,g2,g3))) ] # how many there should be: 5*5*25=625
nrow(datCollapsed) # how many there are
Is there an efficient way to fill in these missing values with 0's, so that all permutations of the by vars are in the resultant collapsed data.table?
回答1:
I'd also go with a cross-join, but would use it in the i
-slot of the original call to [.data.table
:
keycols <- c("g1", "g2", "g3") ## Grouping columns
setkeyv(dat, keycols) ## Set dat's key
ii <- do.call(CJ, sapply(dat[,keycols,with=FALSE], unique)) ## CJ() to form index
datCollapsed <- dat[ii, list(nv=.N)] ## Aggregate
## Check that it worked
nrow(datCollapsed)
# [1] 625
table(datCollapsed$nv)
# 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
# 135 191 162 82 39 13 3
This approach is referred to as a "by-without-by" and, as documented in ?data.table
, it is just as efficient and fast as passing the grouping instructions in via the by
argument:
Advanced: Aggregation for a subset of known groups is particularly efficient when passing those groups in 'i'. When 'i' is a 'data.table', 'DT[i,j]' evaluates 'j' for each row of 'i'. We call this by without by or grouping by i. Hence, the self join 'DT[data.table(unique(colA)),j]' is identical to 'DT[,j,by=colA]'.
回答2:
Make a cartesian join of the unique values, and use that to join back to your results
dat.keys <- dat[,CJ(g1=unique(g1), g2=unique(g2), g3=unique(g3))]
setkey(datCollapsed, g1, g2, g3)
nrow(datCollapsed[dat.keys]) # effectively a left join of datCollapsed onto dat.keys
# [1] 625
Note that the missing values are NA right now, but you can easily change that to 0s if you want.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20914284/including-all-permutations-when-using-data-table-by