问题
Let\'s say I had a branch named coolbranch in my repository.
Now, I decided to delete it (both remotely and locally) with:
git push origin :coolbranch
git branch -D coolbranch
Great! Now the branch is really deleted.
But when I run
git branch -a
I still get:
remotes/origin/coolbranch
Something to notice, is that when I clone a new repository, everything is fine and git branch -a doesn\'t show the branch.
I want to know - is there a way to delete the branch from the branch -a list without cloning a new instance?
回答1:
git remote prune origin, as suggested in the other answer, will remove all such stale branches. That's probably what you'd want in most cases, but if you want to just remove that particular remote-tracking branch, you should do:
git branch -d -r origin/coolbranch
(The -r is easy to forget...)
-r in this case will "List or delete (if used with -d) the remote-tracking branches." according to the Git documentation found here: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-branch
回答2:
Try:
git remote prune origin
From the Git remote documentation:
prune
Deletes all stale remote-tracking branches under <name>. These stale branches have already been removed from the remote repository referenced by <name>, but are still locally available in "remotes/<name>".
With --dry-run option, report what branches will be pruned, but do not actually prune them.
回答3:
Don't forget the awesome
git fetch -p
which fetches and prunes all origins.
回答4:
In our particular case, we use Stash as our remote Git repository. We tried all the previous answers and nothing was working. We ended up having to do the following:
git branch –D branch-name (delete from local)
git push origin :branch-name (delete from remote)
Then when users went to pull changes, they needed to do the following:
git fetch -p
回答5:
Use:
git remote prune <remote>
Where <remote> is a remote source name like origin or upstream.
Example: git remote prune origin
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5094293/git-remote-branch-deleted-but-still-it-appears-in-branch-a