Service Fabric Multiple Communication Listeners

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2019-11-29 23:04:34

问题


Basic Idea - I have a stateless service that implements an Owin communication Listener over http to service WebApi based public clients. I want to add a second listener that will receive requests within the cluster over Rpc using the built in ServiceRemotingListener(). The reason is that I don't want this listener to be public as it implements a non-public management interface for the stateless service. Here is the setup...:

        protected override IEnumerable<ServiceInstanceListener> CreateServiceInstanceListeners()
    {
        return new[]
        {
            new ServiceInstanceListener(initParams => new OwinCommunicationListener("MyWebService", new Startup(_options, this), initParams),"MyServiceHttp"),
            new ServiceInstanceListener(initParams => new ServiceRemotingListener<Interfaces.IConfig>(initParams, this),"MyServiceRpc")           
        };
    }

When I add the second listener, I get an exception starting the app...

                 this.serverHandle = WebApp.Start(this.listeningAddress, appBuilder => this.startup.Configuration(appBuilder));

Exception thrown: 'System.Net.Sockets.SocketException' in System.dll Exception thrown: 'System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException' in System.ServiceModel.dll Exception thrown: 'System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException' in System.ServiceModel.dll Exception thrown: 'System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException' in System.ServiceModel.Internals.dll --multiple repeats--- Exception thrown: 'System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException' in System.Fabric.dll

(not sure how to get the exception details. My "try {} " surrounding did not trap an exception.)

Once in this state, I get subsequent exceptions as the service attempts to auto-restart - the errors are about port sharing.

Anything I can do to make WebApi communication listeners work alongside ServiceRemotingListener? I am assuming at this point that under the hood, ServiceRemotingListener is using http as well and they don't play nicely together.


回答1:


ok, the solution turned out to be straight forward but not obvious. The docs seem to encourage port sharing approach even though the TCP/RPC and HTTP don't play together.

Basically, I added a second endpoint to the service manifest even though the docs say that each service can only listen on one port.

I left the default / first endpoint for the ServiceRemotingListener to register and added a second that listened specifically to port 8083.

<Endpoint Name="ServiceEndpoint" Protocol="http" Type ="Input"/>
<Endpoint Name="ServiceEndpoint2" Protocol="http" Port="8083" Type ="Input"/>

Then in the IOwinCommunicationsListener, I specified the second endpoint which picked up the alternative port number (I assumed the ServiceInstanceListener would use the default/first end point).

var codePackageActivationContext = this.serviceInitializationParameters.CodePackageActivationContext;
var port = codePackageActivationContext.GetEndpoint("ServiceEndpoint2").Port;

The CreateServiceInstanceListeners were left without any extra config. As above, I wonder if I could use the ServiceRemoteListenerSettings to force the ServiceRemotinglistener to use the alternative port instead of the IOwinCommunicationsListener above)

        return new[]
        {
            new ServiceInstanceListener(initParams => new ServiceRemotingListener<Interfaces.IConfig>(initParams, this),"MyRpc"),
            new ServiceInstanceListener(initParams => new OwinCommunicationListener("ShopifyWebService", new Startup(_options, this), initParams),"MyOwin")
               };

Hope this helps save someone else a lot of time.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34836150/service-fabric-multiple-communication-listeners

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!