Why psql can't find relation name for existing table?

扶醉桌前 提交于 2019-11-29 16:07:18

问题


Here' my current state.

Eonil=# \d+
                       List of relations
 Schema |    Name    | Type  | Owner |    Size    | Description 
--------+------------+-------+-------+------------+-------------
 public | TestTable1 | table | Eonil | 8192 bytes | 
(1 row)

Eonil=# \d+ TestTable1
Did not find any relation named "TestTable1".
Eonil=# 

What is the problem and how can I see the table definition?


回答1:


Postgres psql needs escaping for capital letters.

Eonil=# \d+ "TestTable1"

So this works well.

Eonil=# \d+ "TestTable1"
                   Table "public.TestTable1"
 Column |       Type       | Modifiers | Storage  | Description 
--------+------------------+-----------+----------+-------------
 ID     | bigint           | not null  | plain    | 
 name   | text             |           | extended | 
 price  | double precision |           | plain    | 
Indexes:
    "TestTable1_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree ("ID")
    "TestTable1_name_key" UNIQUE CONSTRAINT, btree (name)
Has OIDs: no

Eonil=# 


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15238034/why-psql-cant-find-relation-name-for-existing-table

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!